Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:39:02.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Giving theories of reading a sporting chance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

David C. Plaut*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Computer Science, and the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890. plaut@cmu.eduhttp://www.cnbc.cmu.edu/~plaut

Abstract

The search for a universal theory of reading is misguided. Instead, theories should articulate general principles of neural computation that interact with language-specific learning environments to explain the full diversity of observed reading-related phenomena across the world's languages.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56:384–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. & Patterson, K. (1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103:56115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, G. (2005) The “language instinct” debate. Continuum International.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (2011) Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In: Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link, ed. McCardle, P., Miller, B., Lee, J. R. & Tzeng, O. J. L., pp. 146–68. Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Velan, H. & Frost, R. (2011) Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition 118:141–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed