Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:52:40.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A related proposal: An interactionist perspective on reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Hugo Mercier
Hugo Mercier*
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences Cognitives – Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5307, 69675 Bron, France.hugo.mercier@gmail.comhttps://sites.google.com/site/hugomercier/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This comment introduces the interactionist perspective on reason that Dan Sperber and I developed. In this perspective, reason is a specific cognitive mechanism that evolved so that humans can exchange justifications and arguments with each other. The interactionist perspective significantly aligns with Doris's views in rejecting reflectivism and individualism. Indeed, I suggest that it offers different, and maybe stronger arguments to reject these views.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Malle, B. F. (2006) The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 132(6):25.Google Scholar
Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2017) The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar