Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:19:35.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nietzschean precedent for anti-reflective, dialogical agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Mark Alfano
Mark Alfano*
Affiliation:
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands; Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.mark.alfano@gmail.comwww.alfanophilosophy.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nietzsche anticipates both the anti-reflective and the dialogical aspects of Doris's theory of agency. Nietzsche's doctrine of will to power presupposes that agency does not require reflection but emerges from interacting drives, affects, and emotions. Furthermore, Nietzsche identifies two channels through which dialogical processes of person-formation flow: sometimes a person announces what she is and meets with social acceptance of that claim; sometimes someone else announces what the person is, and she accepts the attribution.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfano, M. (2010) The tenacity of the intentional prior to the Genealogy . Journal of Nietzsche Studies 40:123–40.Google Scholar
Alfano, M. (2013a) Character as moral fiction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alfano, M. (2013b) Nietzsche, naturalism, and the tenacity of the intentional. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44(3):457–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfano, M. (2015) How one becomes what one is called: On the relation between traits and trait-terms in Nietzsche. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 46(1):261–69.Google Scholar
Alfano, M. (2016a) Friendship and the structure of trust. In: From personality to virtue, ed. Masala, A. & Webber, J., pp. 186–206. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alfano, M. (2016b) How one becomes what one is: The case for a Nietzschean conception of character development. In: Questions of character, ed. Fileva, I., 89–104. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfano, M. (2016c) Moral psychology: An introduction. Polity.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. & Gould, O. (1996) Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively. In: Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition, ed. Baltes, P. & Staudinger, U., pp. 221–41. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, P. (2013) Agency and the foundations of ethics: Nietzschean constitutivism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsafanas, P. (2016) The Nietzschean self: Moral psychology, agency, and the unconscious. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, H. (2014) Holding and letting go: The social practice of personal identities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1878/1996) Human, all too human, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1878.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1881/1997) Daybreak: Thoughts on the prejudices of morality, trans. Hollingdale, R. J., ed. Clark, M. & Leiter, B.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1881.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1882/2001) The gay science, trans. Nauckhoff, J., ed. Williams, B.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1882.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1883/2006) Thus spoke Zarathustra, trans. Del Caro, A., ed. Del Caro, A. & Pippin, R.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1883.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1886/2001) Beyond good and evil, trans. Norman, J., ed. Horstmann, R.-P.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1886.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1887/2006) Genealogy of morals, trans. Diethe, C., ed. Ansell-Pearson, K.. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1887.)Google Scholar
Selke, S. (2016) Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging: Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, D. (2006) Natural moralities. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar