Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:01:01.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who are “we”? Dealing with conflicting moral obligations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Alex Shaw Open the ORCID record for Alex Shaw [Opens in a new window]  and
Shoham Choshen-Hillel
Alex Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL60637. ashaw1@uchicago.eduhttps://www.dibslab.uchicago.edu/
Shoham Choshen-Hillel
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, School of Business Administration and the Center for the Study of Rationality, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem9190501. Shoham@huji.ac.ilhttps://shohamchoshen.wixsite.com/psych
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Satisfying one's obligations is an important part of being human. However, people's obligations can often prescribe contradictory behaviors. Moral obligations conflict (loyalty vs. fairness), and so do obligations to different groups (country vs. family when one is called to war). We propose that a broader framework is needed to account for how people balance different social and moral obligations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e86
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benioff, D. & Weiss, D. B. (Writer) (2012) A man without honor [Episode 17]. In: Benioff, David & Weiss's, D. B. (Executive Producers), Game of Thrones. Home Box Office.Google Scholar
Choshen-Hillel, S., Lin, Z. & Shaw, A. (in press) Children weigh equity and efficiency in making allocation decisions: Evidence from the US, Israel, and China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.Google Scholar
Dungan, J. A., Young, L. & Waytz, A. (2019) The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 85:103848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J. & Crockett, M. J. (2018) The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79:200–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99(4):689–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, G., Heyman, G. D., Chen, G., Liu, P. & Lee, K. (2015) Children trust people who lie to benefit others. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 129 :127–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D. (2008) The secret joke of Kant's soul. Moral Psychology 3 :35–79.Google Scholar
Levine, E. E. & Schweitzer, M. E. (2014) Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 53 :107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, S., Mikhail, J. & Leslie, A. M. (2018) Presumed innocent? How tacit assumptions of intentional structure shape moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 :1728–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. G. & Bersoff, D. M. (1992) Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(4):541–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D., Liping, G., Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A. & Berg, B. (2009) Fairness in distributive justice by 3-and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 40:416–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A., Barakzai, A. & Keysar, B. (in press) When negative reciprocity is more fair than positive reciprocity.Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., DeScioli, P. & Olson, K. R. (2012) Fairness versus favoritism in children. Evolution and Human Behavior 33 :736–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starmans, C. & Bloom, P. (2016) When the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak: Developmental differences in judgments about inner moral conflict. Psychological Science 27 :1498–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Dungan, J. & Young, L. (2013) The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49:1027–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar