Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T10:17:39.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A WALK WITH GOODSTEIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2024

DAVID FERNÁNDEZ-DUQUE
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA BARCELONA, SPAIN E-mail: fernandez-duque@ub.edu
ANDREAS WEIERMANN
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS: ANALYSIS LOGIC AND DISCRETE MATHEMATICS GHENT UNIVERSITY GHENT, BELGIUM E-mail: Andreas.Weiermann@UGent.be

Abstract

Goodstein’s principle is arguably the first purely number-theoretic statement known to be independent of Peano arithmetic. It involves sequences of natural numbers which at first appear to diverge, but eventually decrease to zero. These sequences are defined relative to a notation system based on exponentiation for the natural numbers. In this article, we provide a self-contained and modern analysis of Goodstein’s principle, obtaining some variations and improvements. We explore notions of optimality for notation systems and apply them to the classical Goodstein process and to a weaker variant based on multiplication rather than exponentiation. In particular, we introduce the notion of base-change maximality, and show how it leads to far-reaching extensions of Goodstein’s result. We moreover show that by varying the initial base of the Goodstein process, one readily obtains independence results for each of the fragments $\mathsf {I}\Sigma _n$ of Peano arithmetic.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arai, T., Fernández-Duque, D., Wainer, S. S., and Weiermann, A., Predicatively unprovable termination of the Ackermannian Goodstein process . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 148 (2020), no. 8, pp. 35673582.10.1090/proc/14813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichon, E. A., A short proof of two recently discovered independence results using recursion theoretic methods . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 87 (1983), no. 4, pp. 704706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichon, E. A., Buchholz, W., and Weiermann, A., A uniform approach to fundamental sequences and hierarchies . Mathematical Logic Quarterly , vol. 40 (1994), pp. 273286.Google Scholar
Clote, P. and Mcaloon, K., Two further combinatorial theorems equivalent to the 1-consistency of Peano arithmetic . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 48 (1983), no. 4, pp. 10901104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, J., Nivasch, G., and Xu, J., Fusible numbers and Peano arithmetic . Logical Methods in Computer Science , vol. 18 (2022), no. 3, pp. 6:16:26.Google Scholar
Fairtlough, M. and Wainer, S. S., Hierarchies of provably recursive functions , Handbook of Proof Theory (Buss, Samuel R., editor), Elsevier, New York, 1998, pp. 149207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Duque, D. and Weiermann, A., Fast Goodstein walks, preprint, 2022, arXiv:2111.15328.Google Scholar
Fernández-Duque, D. and Weiermann, A., Fundamental sequences and fast-growing hierarchies for the Bachmann–Howard ordinal, Preprint, 2024, arXiv:2203.07758.Google Scholar
Gödel, K., Über Formal Unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und Verwandter Systeme, I . Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik , vol. 38 (1931), pp. 173198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, R. L., On the restricted ordinal theorem . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 9 (1944), no. 2, pp. 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, R. L., Transfinite ordinals in recursive number theory . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 12 (1947), no. 4, pp. 123129.10.2307/2266486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hájek, P. and Paris, J., Combinatorial principles concerning approximations of functions . Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung , vol. 26 (1987), pp. 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanamori, A. and McAloon, K., On Gödel incompleteness and finite combinatorics . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 33 (1987), pp. 2341.10.1016/0168-0072(87)90074-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, L., Flipping properties in arithmetic . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 47 (1982), no. 2, pp. 416422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, L. and Paris, J., Accessible independence results for Peano arithmetic . Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society , vol. 14 (1982), no. 4, pp. 285293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loebl, M. and Nešetřil, J., An unprovable Ramsey-type theorem . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 116 (1992), no. 3, pp. 819824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskens, F. and Weiermann, A., Classifying phase transition thresholds for Goodstein sequences and hydra games , Gentzen’s Centenary: The Quest for Consistency (Kahle, R. and Rathjen, M., editors), Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 455478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, J. and Harrington, L., A mathematical incompleteness in Peano arithmetic , Handbook of Mathematical Logic (Barwise, J., editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 11331142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathjen, M., Goodstein’s theorem revisited , Gentzen’s Centenary: The Quest for Consistency (Kahle, R. and Rathjen, M., editors), Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 229242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D., Built-up systems of fundamental sequences and hierarchies of number-theoretic functions . Archive for Mathematical Logic , vol. 18 (1977), no. 1, pp. 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainer, S. S. and Buchholz, W., Provably computable functions and the fast growing hierarchy , Logic and Combinatorics (Simpson, S. G., editor), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1987, pp. 179198.Google Scholar
Weiermann, A., Classifying the provably total functions of PA, this Journal, vol. 12 (2006), no. 2, pp. 177190.Google Scholar