Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:35:56.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy and speed of urine pregnancy tests done in the emergency department: a prospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Gerald C. Lazarenko ,
Cathy Dobson ,
Rosemarie Enokson  and
Rollin Brant
Gerald C. Lazarenko
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta Department of Emergency Medicine, Foothills Hospital, Calgary
Cathy Dobson*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Foothills Hospital, Calgary
Rosemarie Enokson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Foothills Hospital, Calgary
Rollin Brant
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health, University of Calgary
*
Foothills Medical Centre, Rm. C231, 1403–29th St. NW, Calgary AB T2N 2T9; 403 670–1596, Gerald.Lazarenko@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

Our primary objective was to assess the agreement between urine pregnancy tests done in the emergency department (ED) and those done by the Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS). Our secondary objective was to compare turnaround times for tests done in the ED and those done in the laboratory.

Methods:

This prospective study enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients who required a pregnancy test at 1 of 3 urban Calgary EDs. Using the same urine sample from each patient, testing was done in both the ED and by the CLS using the Abbott TestPak Plus (Abbott Laboratories, Mississauga, Ont.) urine pregnancy kit. The ED data included time of urine collection, β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) result, urine specific gravity, and the time the ED nurse reported the result. The CLS data included the time sample was sent to the laboratory, time of laboratory reporting, time ED nurse was aware of the result, the urine β-hCG result and uring specific gravity. When the ED result and CLS result differed, a serum β-hCG assay was performed and used as the diagnostic “gold standard.”

Results:

There was a high level of agreement between the CLS and the ED, as indicated by a kappa value of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95–0.98). The ED was significantly faster in time to initial report and time to availability on the chart, with mean differences of 25 minutes (95% CI, 22–27) and 60 minutes (95% CI, 56–64), respectively.

Conclusions:

ED nurses can perform urine pregnancy tests as accurately as laboratory technicians, and can provide results on which to base care much faster than the laboratory can. Point-of-care urine pregnancy testing may expedite the ED management of patients who require pregnancy tests.

Keywords

emergency departmenturine pregnancy testingpoint-of-care testing
Type
EM Advances • Progrès de la MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 292 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2001

References

1.Romosko, EA, Sacchetti, AD, Neppo, M.Reliability of patient history in determining the possibility of pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:48–50.Google Scholar
2.Braunstein, GD, Kelley, L, Farber, S, Sigall, ER, Wade, ME.Two rapid, sensitive, and specific immunoenzymatic assays of human choriogonadotropin in urine evaluated. Clin Chem 1986;32:1413–4.Google Scholar
3.Williamson, DF, Parker, RA, Kendrick, JS.The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:916–21.Google Scholar
4.O’Connor, RE, Bibro, CM, Pegg, PJ, Bouzoukis, JK.The comparative sensitivity and specificity of serum and urine HCG determination in the ED [letter]. Am J Emerg Med 1993;18:434–6.Google Scholar
5.Olshaker, JS.Emergency department pregnancy testing. J Emerg Med 1996;14:55–65.Google Scholar