Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:20:00.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Others' Words and Drawing the Limits of the Thinkable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Yitzhak Benbaji
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University and Shalom Hartman Institute

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benbaji, Yitzhak 2004Using Others' Words.” The Journal of Philosophical Research. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming “A Demonstrative Analysis of ‘Open Quotation’: A Reply to Recanati.” Mind and Language.Google Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony 1986Brains in a Vat.” The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 148–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony 1992If I Am a Brain in a Vat, Then I Am Not a Brain in a Wat.” Mind, 101: 123–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1994The Transparency of Mental Content.” Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Lepore, Ernie 1997Varieties of Quotation.” Mind, 106: 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter, and Hale, Bob, eds. 1994 Reading Putnam. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
David, Marian 1991Neither Mentioning ‘Brains in a Vat’ nor Mentioning Brains in a Vat Will Prove that We Are Not Brains in a Vat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51: 891–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984 Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael 1989 “Against Direct Reference.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 14. Edited by French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 206–40.Google Scholar
Forbes, Germane 1995Realism and Skepticism: Brains in a Vat Revisited.” The Journal of Philosophy, 92: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1979 “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Meaning and Use. Edited by Margalit, A.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 239–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1980 Naming and Necessity. Oxford: eBlackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1999a “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” In his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1999b “Putnam's Paradox.” In his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1999 “Davidson's New Cogito.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L. E.. Chicago, IL: Open Court, pp. 195206.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1975 “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In his Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2: Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1981 Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994 “Comments and Replies.” In Clark and Hale 1994, pp. 242–95.Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois 2001Open Quotation.” Mind, 110: 637–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 1987Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes and Semantic Content.” Philosophical Topics, 15: 4787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, T. 1989In Defense of Putnam Brains.” Philosophical Studies, 57: 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter 1988 “On Always Being Wrong.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 12. Edited by French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 95111.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1994 “Putnam's Proof that We Are Not Brains in a Vat.” In Clark and Hale 1994, pp. 216–41.Google Scholar