No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Using Others' Words and Drawing the Limits of the Thinkable
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Winter 2004 , pp. 125 - 146
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2004
References
Benbaji, Yitzhak 2004 “Using Others' Words.” The Journal of Philosophical Research. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming “A Demonstrative Analysis of ‘Open Quotation’: A Reply to Recanati.” Mind and Language.Google Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony 1986 “Brains in a Vat.” The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 148–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony 1992 “If I Am a Brain in a Vat, Then I Am Not a Brain in a Wat.” Mind, 101: 123–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1994 “The Transparency of Mental Content.” Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Lepore, Ernie 1997 “Varieties of Quotation.” Mind, 106: 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Marian 1991 “Neither Mentioning ‘Brains in a Vat’ nor Mentioning Brains in a Vat Will Prove that We Are Not Brains in a Vat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51: 891–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael 1989 “Against Direct Reference.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 14. Edited by French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 206–40.Google Scholar
Forbes, Germane 1995 “Realism and Skepticism: Brains in a Vat Revisited.” The Journal of Philosophy, 92: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1979 “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Meaning and Use. Edited by Margalit, A.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 239–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1999a “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” In his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1999b “Putnam's Paradox.” In his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1999 “Davidson's New Cogito.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L. E.. Chicago, IL: Open Court, pp. 195–206.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1975 “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In his Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2: Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1981 Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 1987 “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes and Semantic Content.” Philosophical Topics, 15: 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, T. 1989 “In Defense of Putnam Brains.” Philosophical Studies, 57: 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter 1988 “On Always Being Wrong.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 12. Edited by French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1994 “Putnam's Proof that We Are Not Brains in a Vat.” In Clark and Hale 1994, pp. 216–41.Google Scholar