Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T02:23:15.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Human Rights of Others: Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and “Just Causes” for the “War on Terror”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

In this essay, Denike assesses the appropriation of international human rights by humanitarian law and policy of “security states.” She maps representations of the perpetrators and victims of “tyranny” and “terror,” and their role in providing a “just cause” for the U.S.-led “war on terror.” By examining narratives of progress and human rights heroism Denike shows how human rights discourses, when used together with the pretense of self-defense and preemptive war, do the opposite of what they claim—entrenching the sovereignty of Western imperialist states while eroding the conditions necessary for the recognition of the human rights of others.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, Muneer. 2004. A rage shared by law: Post‐September 11 racial violence as crimes of passion. 32 92: 1259–330.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, sovereignty, and the making of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annan, Kofi. 2000. Human rights and humanitarian intervention in the twenty‐first century. In Realizing human rights: Moving from inspiration to impact, ed. Power, Samantha and Allison, Graham. New York: Macmillan Palgrave.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1997. Summa theologica. Rio, Wis.: Ages Software: The Master Christian Library.Google Scholar
Banks, William C. 2005. United States response to September 11. In Global anti‐terrorism law and policy, ed. Ramraj, Hor, and Roach, .Google Scholar
Baxi, Uprenda. 1998. Voices of suffering and the future of human rights. 32 8: 125–69.Google Scholar
Bergen, Peter. 2001. Holy War, Inc. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea ed. 2004. Enforcing international norms against terrorism. Portland, Ore.: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Boon, Kristen. 2001. Rape and forced pregnancy under the ICC statute: Human dignity, autonomy, and consent. 32 32: 625–75.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2006. Sovereignty and the return of the repressed. Paper presented at the University of Kent, Centre for Law, Gender, and Sexuality.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2004. Slouching towards new just wars: The hegemon after September 11th. International Relations 18 (4): 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, Charlotte. 1999. Women's rights as human rights: Toward a re‐vision of human rights. In The politics of human rights, ed. The Belgrade Circle. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2002b. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 17, 2002. http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2006. The National Security Strategy of the United States. http://www.white‐house.gov/nsc/nss/2006/nss2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Buss, Doris, and Manji, Ambreena. 2005. Introduction. In International law: Modeern feminist approaches, ed. Buss, Doris and Manji, Ambreena. Portland, Ore.: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2004. Terrorism as an international crime. In Enforcing international norms against terrorism, ed. Bianchi, .Google Scholar
Carlson, John D. 2003. Trials, tribunals, and tribulations of sovereignty: Crimes against humanity and the imago Dei. In The sacred and the sovereign, ed. Carlson, John D. and Owens, Erik C.Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Julie. 2004. Emergence of the individual as an international juristic entity: Enforcement of international human rights. Deakin Law Review 9 (2): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, David. 2001 The road of military humanitarianism. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3): 678700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, David. 2002. From Kosovo to Kabul: Human rights and international intervention. Sterling, Va.: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary. 2005. The missing voice: Women and the war in Iraq. Remarks given at the University of Oregon School of Law, January 26, 2005. Review of International Law 7 (Spring): 525.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, HilaryChinkin, Christine, and Wright, Shelley. 1991. Feminist approaches to international law. 32 85: 613–45.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Chinkin, Christine. 2000. The boundaries of international law: A feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon. 2001. Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention in international law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chinkin, ChristineWright, Shelley, and Charlesworth, Hilary. 2005. Feminist approaches to international law: Reflections from another century. In International law, ed. Buss, and Manji, .Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New generation draws the line: Kosovo, East Timor, and the standards of the West. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Cook, Rebecca ed. 1994. Human rights of women: National and international perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Donna M. 2004. Preemptive war and the legal limits of National Security Policy. IUS Gentium 10: 11.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2004. For a justice to come. Interview by Lieven De Cauter, April 5. http://www.indymedia.be/news/2004/04/83123.php.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The end of human rights: Critical legal thought at the turn of the century. Portland, Ore.: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2002. Postmodern just wars: Kosovo, Afghanistan, and the New World Order. In Law after Ground Zero, ed. Strawson, John. Portland, Ore.: Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2003. Just war against terror: The burden of American power in a violent world. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2005. The just war tradition and natural law. 32 28: 742–53.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 2003. The great terror war. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Helen, and Phillipson, Gavin. 2005. Legislative over‐breadth, democratic failure, and the judicial response: Fundamental rights and the UK's anti‐terrorist policy. In Global anti‐terrorism law and policy, ed. Ramraj, Hor, and Roach, .Google Scholar
Gaer, Felice D. 1999. And never the twain shall meet? The struggle to establish women's rights as human rights. In Sourcebook for advocates’ roundtable: Linking national and international women's human rights. Toronto: York University Centre for Feminist Research.Google Scholar
Girard, Rene. 1986. The scapegoat. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard. 1997. Symposium: Prosecuting international crimes: An inside view: Conference luncheon address. 32 7: 113.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 2006. What's wrong with terrorism? Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1604/2005. The rights of war and peace [De jure belli ac pacis]. Trans. Barbeyrac, Jean. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, 1990. The age of rights. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1991. Use of force: Law and U.S. policy. In Right v. might: International law and the use of force. New York: Council of Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. Human rights as politics and idolatry, ed. Gutman, Amy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2002. Intervention and state failure. In The new killing fields, ed. Mills, and Brunner, .Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2005. The responsibility to protect. http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ratna. 2006. Human rights in the 21st century: Take a walk on the dark side. 32 28: 665–88.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2002/2006. The international human rights movement: Part of the problem? Harvard Human Rights Journal 101:15. Reprinted in International human rights and humanitarian law, ed. Martin, Schnably, Wilson, Simon, and Tushnet.Google Scholar
Klein, Naomi. 2007. The shock doctrine. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Knop, Karen. 1994. Why re‐thinking the sovereign state is important for women's international human rights law. In Human rights of women, ed. Cook, .Google Scholar
Martin, Francisco Forrest, Schnably, Stephen J., Wilson, Richard J., Simon, Jonathan S., and Tushnet, Mark V., eds. 2006. International human rights and humanitarian law: Treatises, cases, and analyses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Nicolaus, and Brunner, Kra, eds. The new killing fields: Massacre and the politics of intervention. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Orend, Brian. 2006. The morality of war. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. 2003. Reading humanitarian intervention: Human rights and the use of force in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Dianne. 2005. Disconcerting “masculinities”: Reinventing the gendered subject(s) of international human rights law. In International law, ed. Buss, and Manji, .Google Scholar
Philipose, Liz. 1999. The laws of war and women's human rights. In Moral issues in global perspective, ed. Koggel, Christine. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Catherine. 2005. Lifting our veil of ignorance: Culture constitutionalism and women's human rights in post‐September 11 America. 32 57: 331–83.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K., and Rai, Amit S. 2002. Monster, terrorist, fag: The war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text 20 (3): 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramraj, Victor V., Hor, Michael, and Roach, Kent. 2005. Introduction. In Global anti‐terrorism law and policy, ed. Ramraj, Victor V., Hor, Michael, and Roach, Kent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, Michael, and Ray, Ellen. 2004. Guantanamo: What the world should know. Melbourne: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., and Abrams, Jason S. 2001. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law: Beyond the Nuremburg legacy. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. 2005. The criminal law and terrorism. In Global anti‐terrorism law and policy, ed. Ramraj, Hor, and Roach, .Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, and Trotter, Gary. 2005. Miscarriages of justice in the war against terror. 32 109: 9671041.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Can the subaltern speak?”Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 2004. Terror: A speech after 9/11. Boundary 2 31 (2): 81112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vattel, Emmerich. 1797/1949. The laws of nations; or principles of the law of nature, applied to the conduct and affairs of nations and sovereigns. Philadelphia: T. & J. W. Johnson.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Franciscus. 1557/1995. De Idis et de Ivre Belli Reectiones. Ed. Nys, Ernest. Trans. Bate, John Pawley. New York: William S. Hein & Co.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs 29 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth. 2004. Countering catastrophic terrorism: An American view. In Enforcing international norms against terrorism, ed. Bianchi, .Google Scholar
Zulaika, Joseba, and Douglass, William A. 1996. Terror and taboo: The follies, fables, and faces of terrorism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar