Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:32:11.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘John is easy to see’ re-investigated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Gisela Morsbach  and
Pamela M. Steel
Gisela Morsbach
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Pamela M. Steel
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , October 1976 , pp. 443 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cambon, J. & Sinclair, H. (1974). Relations between syntax and semantics: are they ‘easy to see’? BJPsych 65. 133–40.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1970). Children are nice to understand: surface clues for the recovery of a deep structure. BJPsych 61. 397–408.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. (1972). Language development: structure and function. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Kessel, F. S. (1970). The role of syntax in children's comprehension from ages six to twelve. Mongr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 35.Google ScholarPubMed
Steele, P. M. (1974). Experimental techniques for the measurement of comprehension and acquisition of the structure ‘John is easy/eager to please’. M.Ed. thesis, Univ. of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar