Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T03:17:34.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of changes in multi-pillar pension systems in CEE countries on individual pension wealth*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2016

AGNIESZKA CHŁOŃ-DOMIŃCZAK
AGNIESZKA CHŁOŃ-DOMIŃCZAK*
Affiliation:
Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics, Madalinskiego 6/8, Warsaw 02-513, Poland (e-mail: achlon@sgh.waw.pl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper shows the impact of changes in multi-pillar pension systems in six Central and Eastern European countries for individual pension wealth. It demonstrates that the post-crisis changes in pension system reduced pension wealth of workers in Poland and increased in Lithuania and Slovakia. The change did not have significant impact on pension wealth in Estonia and Romania. The magnitude of this effect is highest in those countries where the reduction of the fully-funded pension contribution was permanent. Loss or gain in pension wealth varies with age of participants – it is higher for younger people, who will accumulate their pension wealth to a larger extent after the change. The level of the change in pension wealth depends also on the wage level – higher earners lose more relative to the average wage level. The difference in pension wealth depends also on the difference between rates of return in fully funded and pay-as-you-go (PAYG) components of the pension system. The net outcome of post-crisis pension system modifications depends both on the magnitude of fully-funded contribution reduction, but also on the design of PAYG component and the way individual pension rights are accrued. These results indicate the rise in implicit liability of pension system in Slovakia to be higher than the reduction of the explicit liability caused by the pension system change and the lower rise of implicit liability in Poland and Latvia.

Keywords

H53I38J11J14P36Pension systemspension wealthfinancial crisisCentral and Eastern Europe
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 110 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research in this paper was financed from grant number UMO-2012/05/B/HS4/04206 from the National Science Centre in Poland. I would like to thank Kamila Bielawska and Dariusz Stańko for their co-operation and support during the project work. I am grateful to Robert Palacios and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that contributed to improvements of this paper.

References

Beblavý, Miroslav (2011) Why Has the Crisis Been Bad for Private Pensions, but Good for the Flat Tax? The Sustainability of ‘Neoliberal’ Reforms in the New EU Member States. CEPS Working Document.Google Scholar
Bielawska, Kamila, Chłoń-Domińczak, Agnieszka and Stańko, Dariusz (2016) Policy Reversals in Central and Eastern European Funded Pension Systems. What are the Reasons for Downsizing CEE Pension Funds? NCN project report.Google Scholar
Borella, Margherita and Fornero, Elsa (2009) Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: an analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. ENEPRI Research Report, (68): 1–57.Google Scholar
Casey, Bernard H. (2014) From pension funds to piggy banks: (Perverse) consequences of the stability and growth pact since the crisis. International Social Security Review, 67: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chybalski, Filip (2011) The resilience of pension systems in the CEE countries to financial and economic crisis: The need for higher diversification. Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karvina, 258–67.Google Scholar
DG Employment, and Social Protection Committee (2012) Pension Adequacy in the European Union 2010–2050. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Drahokoupil, Jan and Domonkos, Stefan (2012) Averting the funding-gap crisis: East European pension reforms after 2008. Global Social Policy, 12(3): 283–299.Google Scholar
European Commission (2015) The 2015 Pension Adequacy Report: Current and Future Income Adequacy in Old Age in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Volume 1, pp. 1–396.Google Scholar
European Commission DG ECFIN (2015) The 2015 ageing report. Economic and Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy, 3: 1–424.Google Scholar
European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs (2014) The 2015 ageing report. Underlying assumptions and projection methodologies. European Economcy, (8): 1–413.Google Scholar
Fultz, Elaine (2012) The retrenchment of second-tier pensions in Hungary and Poland: a precautionary tale. International Social Security Review, 65(3): 1–25. Available online at http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2012.01434.x.Google Scholar
Grech, Aaron George (2013) How Best to Measure Pension Adequacy. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion Discussion Paper (172). Available online at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51270/.Google Scholar
Guardiancich, Igor (2009) Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, Implementation and Sustainability Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe: Legislation, Implementation and Sustainability. Doctoral thesis, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Hirose, Kenichi (2011) Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe in Times of Crisis, Austerity and beyond.Google Scholar
Jarett, Peter (2011) Pension reforms in Poland and elsewhere: the view from Paris. CASE Network Studies & Analyses No 425/2011: 1–31.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Pensions at a Glance. Retirement-Income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. Available online at (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/pensions-at-a-glance_9789264059771-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2013) Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 Indicators.Google Scholar
OECD (2015) Pensions at a Glance 2015: OECD and G20 Indicators. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2015-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2011) Pension privatization in crisis: death or rebirth of a global policy trend? International Social Security Review, 64(January 2010): 65–80.Google Scholar
Price, Will and Rudolph, Heinz P. (2013) Reversal and reduction, resolution and reform lessons from the financial crisis in Europe and Central Asia to improve outcomes from mandatory private pensions. World Bank Report, (77779): 1–82.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Anita and Arias, Omar (2014) The Inverting Pyramid. Pension Systems Facing Demographic Challenges in Europe and Central Asia. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar