Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T21:16:54.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nonconstructive content of sentences of arithmetic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Nicolas D. Goodman*
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Amherst, NY 14226

Extract

This note is concerned with the old topic, initiated by Kleene, of the connections between recursive function theory and provability in intuitionistic arithmetic. More specifically, we are interested in the relationship between the hierarchy of degrees of unsolvability and the interdeducibility of cases of excluded middle. The work described below was motivated by a counterexample, to be given presently, which shows that that relationship is more complicated than one might suppose.

Let HA be first-order intuitionistic arithmetic. Let the symbol ⊢ mean derivability in HA. For each natural number n, let n¯ be the corresponding numeral. Let Ω be the standard model of arithmetic. Say that a sentence ϕ is true iff Ω⊨ ϕ. Now suppose ϕ(x) and Ψ(x) are formulas with only the variable x free. Suppose

Then it is natural to conjecture that {n∣Ω⊨Ψ(n¯)} is recursive in {n∣Ω⊨ϕ(n¯)}.

However, this conjecture is false. Consider the formula is a formalization of Kleene's T-predicate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

[1]Kleene, S. C., Disjunction and existence under implication in elementary intuitionistic formalisms, this Journal, vol. 27 (1962), pp. 1118.Google Scholar