Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:09:15.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2020

Hossein Nassaji
Hossein Nassaji*
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
*
E-mail: nassaji@uvic.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How to correct learner errors has long been of interest to both language teachers and second language acquisition (SLA) researchers. One way of doing so is through interactional feedback, which refers to feedback provided on learners' erroneous utterances during conversational interaction. Various theoretical claims have been made regarding the beneficial effects of interactional feedback, and over the years a considerable body of research has examined its effectiveness. In this context, a central and challenging question has always been how to determine whether such feedback is effective for language learning. Studies investigating the role of feedback have used various measures to assess its usefulness. In this paper, I will begin with a brief overview of the recent studies examining interactional feedback, with a focus on how its effectiveness has been assessed. I will then examine the various measures used in both descriptive and experimental research and discuss the issues associated with such measures. I will conclude with what continues to pose us a challenge in assessing the role of feedback and offer some recommendations to inform future research in this area.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 3 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner–learner interactions? Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajabshir, Z. (2014). The effect of implicit and explicit types of feedback on learners’ pragmatic development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwright, R. (1984). Why don't learners learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis. In Singleton, D. & Little, D. (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3–18). Dublin, Ireland: IRAL.Google Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. C. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. C. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bao, M., Egi, T., & Han, Y. (2011). Classroom study on noticing and recast features: Capturing learner noticing with uptake and stimulated recall. System, 39, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25, 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L., & Cummings, M. C. (1996). Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In Gass, S. & Neu, J. (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 65–86). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1991). Achieving proficiency in a second language: A processing description. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Sharwood Smith, M. & Swain, M. (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 63–78). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In Tarone, E., Gass, S. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowles, M. (2010). The think aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M., & Leow, R. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20, 436–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, H., Jeon, K., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2005). Implicit and explicit learning. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 314–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The role of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and learner variability. In Burmeister, H. & Rounds, P. (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language acquisition forum (pp. 25–60). Eugene: University of Oregon, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005a). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005b). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006a). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006b). Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016a). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016b). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2007). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005): Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.) (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, A. (2003). Valid and non-reactive verbalization of thoughts during performance of tasks towards a solution to the central problems of introspection as a source of scientific data. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Ericsson, A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2009). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R., & Loewen, S. (2010). Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 877–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. (1988). Nature of development in L2 acquisition and implications for theories of language acquisition in general. In Flynn, S. & O'Neill, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 277–294). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, T., & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuya, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts of EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21, 1–47.Google Scholar
Fukuya, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2006). The effects of recasting on the production of pragmalinguistic conventions of request by Chinese learners of English. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15, 59–91.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2017). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., … Yoon, H. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 563–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2015). Does type of modified output correspond to learner noticing of feedback? A closer look in face-to-face and computer-mediated task-based interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1393–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 423–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamayan, E., Saegert, J., & Larudee, P. (1977). Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech, 20, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, L., & Nassaji, H. (2016). The role of extensive recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedgcock, J. (1993). Well-formed vs. ill-formed strings in L2 metalingual tasks: Specifying features of grammaticality judgements. Second Language Research, 9, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data1. Applied Linguistics, 18, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processng and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -tei-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junqueira, L., & Kim, Y. (2013). Exploring the relationship between training, beliefs, and teachers’ corrective feedback practices: A case study of a novice and an experienced ESL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiya, N. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts on L2 acquisition for implicit and explicit knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 29, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, H. (2014). Understanding online reading through the eyes of first and second language readers: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 73, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (2003). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kentridge, R., Heywood, C., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999). Attention without awareness in blindsight. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 1805–1811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J., & Nam, H. (2017). Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Nassaji, H. (2018). Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion. Language Teaching Research, 22, 698–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, D., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lamme, V. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Strom, V. (1977). The construction of a second language acquisition index of development 1. Language Learning, 27, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leow, R., Grey, S., Marijuan, S., & Moorman, C. (2014). Concurrent data elicitation procedures, processes, and the early stages of L2 learning: A critical overview. Second Language Research, 30, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-based ESL lessons (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 361–378). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in adults English L2 classrooms: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2012). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2010). Pragmatics and speech act performance. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Crowther, D., Kielstra, P., & Trofimovich, P. (2015). Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts. Second Language Research, 31, 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In Tarone, E., Gass, S. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 227–243). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2007a). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57, 511–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2007b). Focus on form through recasts in dyadic student-teacher interaction: A case for recast enhancement. In Gascoigne, C. (Ed.), Assessing the impact of input enhancement in second language education (pp. 53–69). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2010). The occurrence and effectiveness of spontaneous focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 907–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2011). Immediate learner repair and its relationship with learning targeted forms in dyadic interaction. System, 39, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2015). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20, 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. Modern Language Journal, 101, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2010). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M., Do, H., Pham, T., & Nguyen, A. (2017). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56, 345–375.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nipaspong, P., & Chinokul, S. (2010). The role of prompts and explicit feedback in raising EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 101–146.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 716–761). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in ns-nns interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, M. (1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 7398–7403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prutting, C., Gallagher, T., & Mulac, A. (1975). The expressive portion of the nsst compared to a spontaneous language sample. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reber, A. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Mackey, A. (2013). Prompted production. In Chappelle, C. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (Vol. 5). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In Doughty, C., & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehr, K. (2007). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 29, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 131–164). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N. (2012). Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process-product study. Language Teaching Research, 16, 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In Anderson, C., & Beretta, A. (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197–221). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D., & Welsh, C. (1973). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In Ferguson, C., & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 485–489). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (1985). Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition-poor environments *. Applied Linguistics, 6, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W., & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Keller, F. (2005). Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua, 115, 1497–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 723–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1229–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34, 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1985). Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35, 373–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. (2018). Comparing explicit exemplar-based and rule-based corrective feedback: Introducing analogy-based corrective feedback. Modern Language Journal, 102, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2014). ‘Repeat as much as you can’: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French. In Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A. & Hilton, H. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 143–166). Bristol, UK: MultilingualMatters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2005). Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammatically judgement tasks in linguistic theory. University of Hawai'I Second Langauge Studies, 24, 129–167.Google Scholar
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2015). Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velmans, M. (1996). The science of consciousness: Psychological, neuropsychological, and clinical reviews. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 673–691). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319–353). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Eye-movement recordings in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 680–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar