Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:39:15.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse Analysis in English- A Short Review of the Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Malcolm Coulthard
Malcolm Coulthard
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 73 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. P. L. & Widdowson, H. G. (1974). English in Physical Science. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1974). Acquisition of pragmatic competence. Journal of Child Language, 1, 2, 277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T. & Smith, F. L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (forthcoming) Intonation is discourse.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. & Coulthard, R. M. (forthcoming). Exchange structure.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax. Harvard Educational Review, 34, 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. C., Leather, J. & Bruton, C. (1974). English language skills for overseas doctors and medical staff: reports 1–4. University of Lancaster mimeo.Google Scholar
Coulthard, R. M. (1974). Approaches to the analysis of classroom discourse. Educational Review, 26, 3, 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, R. M. & Ashby, C. M. (1973). Doctor-patient interviews. Working Papers in Discourse Analysis, 1. University of Birmingham mimeo.Google Scholar
Coulthard, R. M. & Ashby, C. M. (forthcoming). A linguistic description of doctor- patient interviews. In Wadsworth, M.(ed.), Medical sociology.Google Scholar
Coulthard, R. M., Sinclair, J. McH. & Forsyth, I. J. (1972). Discourse in the classroom. Mimeo distributed by CILT.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (MS.). On the acquisition of speech acts: a pragmatic description of early language development.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1970). Towards a semantic deep structure of discourse grammar. In Papers from the sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 2, 283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (1973). Towards a grammar for dyadic conversation. Semiotica, 9, 1, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (1974). On the Structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 3, 2, 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. & Niederehe, G. (1974). On signalling that its your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 234–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974). The comprehension and prouction of requests by children. Papers and reports on child language development. Stanford: Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, R. (forthcoming). Two concepts of function in a cognitive model of communication. In Candlin, C. C. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1973 BAAL Conference on the Communicative Teaching of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1972). May we come in. In Smith, D. M. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), Sociolinguistics in crosscultural perspective. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1935). The technique of semantics. Reprinted in Firth, J. R. (1957), Papers in Linguistics 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, I. J. (1974). Patterns in the discourse of pupils and teachers. In The space between… CILT reports and papers 10. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, reprinted inCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laver, J. & Hutcheson, S. (eds.), Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Herasimchuk, E. (1972). The conversational analysis of social meaning: a study of classroom interaction. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: current trends and prospects. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.). (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17, 241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37–81, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28,1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. (1968). Grammatical cohesion in spoken and written English. Paper 7, Schools Council programme in linguistics and English teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hendricks, W. O. (1967). On the notion ‘beyond the sentence’. Linguistics, 37, reprinted in Hendricks (1973).Google Scholar
Hendricks, W. O. (1973). Essays on semiolinguistics and verbal art. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972 a). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, G. G. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972 b). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jakobovits, L. A. & Gordon, B. (1974). The context of foreign language teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 1, 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.(1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3, 2, 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. F. (forthcoming). Some implications of discourse analysis for the teaching of spoken English for Academic Purposes.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (forthcoming). The role of discourse analysis in devising undergraduate reading programmes in EST. Mimeo available from ETIC.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1969). Discourse referents. Preprint 70, International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Stockholm; quoted in Hendricks (1973).Google Scholar
Keenan, E. O. (1974). Conversational competence in children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 2, 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insults. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Language, 48, 4, 907–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. (1974). Communicative functions of phatic communion. In Work in Progress 7. Edinburgh: Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
de Long, A. J. (1974). Kinesic signals at utterance boundaries in preschool children. Semiotica, 11, 1, 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiot, M. (1972). Cognitive analysis of a myth: an exercise in method. Semiotica, 6, 2, 101–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, E. (1972). Implications of teacher-strategies for language and cognition: observations in first-grade classrooms. In Cazden, C., Johns, V. P. & Hymes, D. (eds.) Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. O. (1967). English structure above the sentence level. Monograph series on Languages and Linguistics, 20.Google Scholar
Pearce, R. D. (1973 a). The structure of discourse in broadcast interviews. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Pearce, R. D. (1973 b). The television discussion programme. Working Papers in Discourse Analysis, 3. University of Birmingham mimeo.Google Scholar
Pearce, R. D. (MS.). Discourse structure in the television discussion programme.Google Scholar
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folk tale, 2nd edition. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1967–1972). Mimeo lecture notes.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972 a). On the analysability of stories by children. In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (MS.), Aspects of the sequential organisation of conversation.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 4, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayce, R. A. (1957). Literature and language. Essays in Criticism, 7.Google Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27, 316–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 6, 1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 4, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1974). Towards a structural analysis of discussions. Semiotica, 11, 2, 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M. (1974). The comprehension of indirect directives: can two year olds shut the door? Paper presented the summer meeting of the LSA.Google Scholar
Siegman, A. W. & Pope, B. (eds.). (1972). Studies in dyadic communication. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (1973). Interview talk: bringing off a research instrument. Sociology, 7, 1, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.McH., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH., Forsyth, I. J., Coulthard, R. M. & Ashby, M. C. (1972). The English used by teachers and pupils. Final Report to SSRC. University of Birmingham mimeo.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1973). Some structural complexities of talk in meetings. Working Papers in Discourse Analysis, 5. University of Birmingham mimeo.Google Scholar
Turner, R. (1970). Words, utterances and activities. In Douglas, J. (ed.), Understanding everyday life. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1973). An applied linguistic approach to discourse analysis. University of Edinburgh, unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1974 a). The deep structure of discourse and the use of translation. In Corder, S. P. & Roulet, E. (eds.), Linguistic insights in applied linguistics. Second Neuchâtel Colloquium in Applied Linguistics. Brussels: AIMAV; Paris: DidierGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1974 b). An approach to the teaching of scientific English discourse. RELC Journal, 5, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. Notional syllabuses and the concept of a minimum adequate grammar. In Corder, S. P. & Roulet, E. (eds.), Linguistic insights in applied linguistics. Second Neuchâtel Colloquium in Applied Linguistics. Brussels: AIMAV; Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Williams, S. (1974). A sociolinguistic analysis of the general practice interview. University of Birmingham, unpublished MA thesis.Google Scholar