Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:51:15.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Many lessons from a school: What classroom discourse analysis reveals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Jane Zuengler*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison, USAzuengler@wisc.edu

Abstract

In my talk, I foreground what I and my colleagues have learned about discourse in the numerous classrooms we observed in a four-year research study at an urban high school. While Jefferson High had a student body that was linguistically and culturally diverse, it was homogeneous socioeconomically, being labeled ‘low income’. Some of the research I address reveals how the classroom discourse both co-constructed and was influenced by these phenomena. Additionally, my survey of the research reveals that theoretical frameworks shape the research process and, ultimately, what we learn about classroom discourse.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. C. (eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
*Bishop, H. (2007). The functions of lexical items in the Asthma Project discourse. In Cole & Zuengler (eds.), 21–42.Google Scholar
*Cole, K. M. (2007). Where reform and interaction meet: Spaces for appropriation and resistance. In Cole & Zuengler (eds.), 103–124.Google Scholar
*Cole, K. M. (2008). The writing on the wall: The Daily Calendar and science practice. In Bruna, K. & Gomez, K. (eds.), Talking science, writing science: The work of language in multicultural classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 6992.Google Scholar
*Cole, K. M. & Zuengler, J. (2003). Engaging in an authentic science project: Appropriating, resisting, and denying ‘scientific’ identities. In Bayley, R. & Schecter, S. (eds.), Language socialization in bilingual and multilingual societies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 98113.Google Scholar
*Cole, K. M. & Zuengler, J. (eds.) (2007). The research process in classroom discourse analysis: Current perspectives. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Routledge.Google Scholar
*Curran, M. E. (2007). Narratives of relevance: Seizing (or not) critical moments. In Cole & Zuengler (eds.), 77–98.Google Scholar
*Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32.4, 369408.Google Scholar
*Ford, C. E. & Zuengler, J. (1998). Negotiating relevance: A piece in the puzzle of academic talk. English Update 4–5 (SUNY). Albany, NY: CELA (Center on English Learning & Achievement).Google ScholarPubMed
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and practice. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, K. D. (1992). A comparison of instructional context in writing process classrooms with Latino children. Education and Urban Society 24, 244262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hellermann, J. (2005)a. Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three- part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.1, 105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hellermann, J. (2005)b. The sequential and prosodic co-construction of a ‘quiz game’ activity in classroom talk. Journal of Pragmatics 37.6, 919944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hellermann, J. (2007). The contextualization of participation in the Asthma Project: Response sequences in classroom talk. In Cole & Zuengler (eds.), 49–72.Google Scholar
*Hellermann, J. K., Cole, K. M. & Zuengler, J. (2001). Developing thinking communities through talk: Two case studies from science classes. CELA Research Report (Series 14001; SUNY). Albany, New York: CELA (Center on English Learning and Achievement).Google Scholar
*Higgins, C. M., Thompson, M. M. & Roeder, R. V. (2003). In search of a profound answer: Mainstream scripts and the marginalization of advanced-track urban students. Linguistics and Education 14.2, 195220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Miller, E. & Zuengler, J. (forthcoming). Negotiating access to learning through resistance to classroom practice. To appear in The Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-making for conversation. Language in Society 29, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Vavrus, F. & Cole, K. M. (2002). I didn't do nothing: The discursive construction of school suspension. Urban Review 34.2, 82111.Google Scholar
*Young, R. F. & Nguyen, H. T. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. In Zuengler, J. & Mori, J. (eds.), Microanalyses of classroom discourse: A critical consideration of method: Special Issue of Applied Linguistics 23.3, 348372.Google Scholar
*Zuengler, J. (2000). Framing the question. WCER [Wisconsin Center for Education Research] Highlights 12.3, 45.Google Scholar
*Zuengler, J. (2004). Jackie Chan drinks Mountain Dew: Constructing cultural models of citizenship. In Harklau, L. & Zuengler, J. (eds.), Popular culture and classroom language learning: Special Issue of Linguistics and Education 14.3/4, 277304.Google Scholar
*Zuengler, J. (forthcoming). Performing ‘national’ practices: Identity and hybridity in immigrant youths’ communication. In Higgins, C. M. (ed.), Negotiating the self in a second language: Identity formation and cross-cultural adaptation in a globalizing world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
*Zuengler, J. & Miller, E. (2007). Apprenticing into a community: Challenges of the Asthma Project. In Cole & Zuengler (eds.), 129–148.Google Scholar