Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T07:54:10.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Materials use in language classrooms: A research agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2022

Anne Marie Guerrettaz ,
Corinne S. Mathieu ,
Siwon Lee  and
Adon Berwick
Anne Marie Guerrettaz*
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Pullman, USA
Corinne S. Mathieu
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, USA
Siwon Lee
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: a.m.guerrettaz@wsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How language learners and teachers actually use pedagogical materials in classrooms is a ‘groundbreaking’ subject of applied linguistics inquiry (Tarone, 2014, p. 653), referred to in this research agenda article as materials use. We begin with a theoretically-oriented overview of language education scholarship on pedagogical materials (henceforth materials). Then, we focus on seven qualitative research tasks across three thematic areas, namely materials use and: (A) language pedagogy, (B) classroom interaction, and (C) language diversity, culture, and power. The first section on pedagogy outlines research tasks on: (1) the roles of materials in classrooms, (2) the influences of materials on practicing educators’ expertise, and (3) how language teacher education programmes address materials use. The second section on classroom interaction proposes inquiry into: (4) polysemiotic patterns of materials-in-interaction, and (5) the expected and unexpected outcomes of materials regarding students’ target language use. The third section focuses on: (6) teachers’ and learners’ responses to diverse linguistic varieties and cultures represented in materials, and (7) instructional materials used in language policy and planning endeavours. Throughout this article we reference interdisciplinary connections to curriculum studies, cultural studies, sociology, and materials scholarship in general education. The seven research tasks are critical next steps for understanding materials use – a vast new field that promises to advance language education practice and theory.

Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 547 - 564
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimova, N., & Johnston, B. (2012). Invisibility and ownership of language: Problems of representation in Russian language textbooks. Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London, UK: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1975). Towards a theory of educational transmissions (Vol. III, Class, codes and control). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bosompem, E. G. (2014). Materials adaptation in Ghana: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. In Garton, S., & Graves, K. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 104–120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, tr.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In Johnson, R. (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2009). Why and how textbooks should encourage extensive reading. ELT Journal, 63(3), 238–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Materializing ‘competence’: Perspectives from international STEM scholars. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, G. (2016). (Re)Searching culture in foreign language textbooks, or the politics of hide and seek. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choppin, J., McDuffie, A. R., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2018). Curriculum ergonomics: Conceptualizing the interactions between curriculum design and use. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Weninger, C. (Eds.) (2015). Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl. 1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2013). (Re)placing school: Middle school students’ countermobilities while composing with iPods. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(2), 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engman, M., & Hermes, M. (2020, 30 April). Land as interlocutor: Transcribing and analyzing material participation in interaction [Webinar]. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. Retrieved from https://carla.umn.edu/presentations/recordings.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ewald, J. (2008). The assumption of participation in small group work: An investigation of L2 teachers’ and learners’ expectations. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falzon, M.-A. (2016). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 654–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2019). Materials use and development. In Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education (p. 417). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2000). The ELT coursebook as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal, 54(3), 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014–2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A. M. (2021). Materials-in-action: Pedagogical ergonomics of a French-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A. M., Engman, M., & Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Empirically defining language learning and teaching materials in use through sociomaterial perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A. M., Grandon, M., Lee, S., Mathieu, C., Berwick, A., Murray, A., & Pourhaji, M. (2018a). Materials use and development: Synergetic processes and research prospects. Folio, 18(2), 37–44.Google Scholar
Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A. M., Marcos Miguel, N., & Bell, N. (2018b). Research to improve U.S. foreign language education: How do instructional materials in Spanish classrooms help or hinder students in learning to speak the language? Unpublished Spencer Foundation grant proposal (funded).Google Scholar
Hafermalz, E., & Riemer, K. (2015). The question of materiality: Mattering in the network society. In Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., & de Marco, M. (Chairs), Association for information systems (pp. 1–17). Munster, Germany: AIS Electronic Library. doi:10.18151/7217339Google Scholar
Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, N. (2014). Content, consumption, and production: Three levels of textbook research. In Harwood, N. (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 1–41). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, A. (2018). Understanding task-in-process through the lens of laughter: Activity designs, instructional materials, learner orientations, and interpersonal relationships. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, A. (2021). Sociomateriality of semi-scripted pair-work prompts in beginner-level Japanese as a foreign language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1959). Planning for a standard language in modern Norway. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(3), 8–21.Google Scholar
Helmer, K. A. (2014). ‘It's not real, it's just a story to just learn Spanish’: Understanding heritage language learner resistance in a Southwest charter high school. Heritage Language Journal, 11(3), 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., Tapia, A. A., Hanks, D. H., Dueñas, F. K., & Lee, S. (2018). Ethnography of language planning and policy. Language Teaching, 51(2), 152–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, T. (2015). Handling knowledge: Using classroom materials to construct and interpret information requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, T. (2018). The environment of a bilingual classroom as an interactional resource. Linguistics and Education, 44, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, T. & Jauni, H. (in press). Mediated learning materials: Visibility checks in video-mediated classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse.Google Scholar
Jaspers, J. (2015). Modelling linguistic diversity at school: The excluding impact of inclusive multilingualism. Language Policy, 14(2), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. O. (2011). Language, ideology, and identity in South Korean education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (Accession Order No. UMI: 3488740). Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol28/iss1/7.Google Scholar
Kiczkowiak, M. (2020). Seven principles for writing materials for English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 74(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Kellogg, D. (2007). Rules out of roles: Differences in play language and their developmental significance. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer-Dahl, A. (2008). Negotiating what counts as English language teaching: Official curriculum and its enactment in two Singaporean secondary classrooms. Research Papers in Education, 23(1), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Vinall, K. (2015). The cultural politics of language textbooks in the era of globalization. In Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Weninger, C. (Eds.), Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education (pp. 11–28). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Külekçi, E. (2015). ‘Authenticity’ in English language teaching and learning: A case study of four high school classrooms in Turkey (Ph.D. thesis). University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). It's about time. Modern Language Journal, 71(1), 62–64.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2019). Speaking Korean in America: An ethnographic study of a community-based Korean heritage language school (Ph.D. thesis). University of Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. (2005). Engaging critical pedagogy: Spanish for native speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. J. (2017). An examination of language teachers’ enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralised curriculum. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(3), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maijala, M. (2020). Pre-service language teachers’ reflections and initial experiences on the use of textbooks in classroom practice. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(2), 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, A. (2011). Squaring the circle – reconciling materials as constraint with materials as empowerment. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 379–402). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, D. (2018). Linguistic landscape. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 869–885). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcos Miguel, N. (2015). Textbook consumption in the classroom: Analyzing a classroom corpus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, C. (2017). Spanish immersion materials and the secondary classroom ecology (Unpublished thesis). University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Mathieu, C. (in press). Ipads and interaction: A materials perspective on collaborative discourse in secondary Spanish immersion. Classroom Discourse.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (2019). Material moments: Teacher and student use of materials in multilingual writing classroom interactions. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Student-initiated use of smartphones in multilingual writing classrooms: Making learner agency and multiple involvements visible. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 142–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction and linguistic form: An empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Meek, B. A. (2010). “We are our language”: An ethnography of language revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan community. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Mishan, F., & Timmis, I. (2015). Materials development for TESOL. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B., & Martin, I. (2014). Toward a research agenda for classroom-as-ecosystem. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. (2003). Task-based learning: The interaction between tasks and learners. ELT Journal, 57(4), 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2020). Multimodal interaction analysis. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In Breen, M. (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159–171). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In Hyland, K., & Paltridge, B. (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120–137). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ogbu, J. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opoku-Amankwa, K. (2010). What happens to textbooks in the classroom? Pupils’ access to literacy in an urban primary school in Ghana. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2002). Experiences of Spanish heritage speakers in university foreign language courses and implications for teacher training. Association of Departments of Foreign Languages Bulletin, 33(3), 35–42.Google Scholar
Pourhaji, M., Alavi, S. M., & Karimpour, S. (2016). Built-in learner participation potential of locally- and globally-designed ELT materials. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 119–156.Google Scholar
Reed, Y. (2016). Something new out of Africa: The African Storybook initiative as a catalyst for curriculum making. In Carmo, M. (Ed.), International conference on education and new development (pp. 51–55). Lisbon, Portugal: World Institute for Advanced Research and Science.Google Scholar
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyhner, J., & Lockard, L. (Eds.). (2009). Indigenous language revitalization: Encouragement, guidance and lessons learned. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2014). The ELT textbook. In Garton, S., & Graves, K. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 19–36). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sallabank, J. (2010). Standardisation, prescription and polynomie: Can Guernsey follow the Corsican model? Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, D. (2006). Framing the textbook in classroom events. Folio, 11(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (Eds.). (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V. (2005). Expertise in pedagogic task design. In Johnson, K. (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 230–254). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seferaj, K. (2014). Coping with new teaching approaches and materials: An east-European EFL teacher's interpretation of communicative teaching activities. In Garton, S., & Graves, K. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 89–103). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sert, O., & Amri, M. (2021). Learning potentials afforded by a film in task-based interactions in a Swedish EFL classroom. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shawer, S. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In Jackson, P. W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–435). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spindler, G., & Spindler, L. (1992). Cultural process and ethnography: An anthropological perspective. In Millroy, W. L., & Preissle, J. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 53–92). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed., pp. 119–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stranger-Johannessen, E., & Norton, B. (2017). The African storybook and Language teacher identity in digital times. Modern Language Journal, 101(Suppl. 1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Su, H. (2020). Patterns, local grammars, and the design of English teaching materials. ELT Journal, 74(1), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (2014). Research on materials and their role in classroom discourse and SLA. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 652–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tembe, J., & Reed, Y. (2016). Languaging in and about Lunyole: African storybook materials as a catalyst for re-imagining literacy teaching and learning in two Ugandan primary schools. Reading & Writing, 7(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. (2000). A dogma for EFL. IATEFL Issues, 153, 2. Retrieved from https://nebula.wsimg.com/5663ba0b760132a894433eb2c1faec95?AccessKeyId=186A535D1BA4FC995A73&disposition=0&alloworigin=1.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L., & Hellermann, J. (2017). Mobile augmented reality: Hyper contextualization and situated language usage events. In Colpaert, J., Aerts, A., Kern, R., & Kaiser, M. (Eds.), Proceedings from the XVIIIth international CALL conference: CALL in context (pp. 721–730). Antwerp, Belgium: Nieuwe Media Dienst, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: Emergent assemblages and entangled actions. Modern Language Journal, 105(Suppl. 1), 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbits, B., & Pashby, P. (2014). The story-reading project: Integrating materials development with language learning and teaching for NNES teachers in training. In Garton, S., & Graves, K. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 104–120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tin, T. B. (2012). Freedom, constraints and creativity in language learning tasks: New task features. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2016). SLA research and materials development for language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2018). The onto-epistemologies of New Materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 1–21.Google Scholar
Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Hof, L., Nuñez, O., & Singh, A. (2015). “That sounds so cooool”: Entanglements of children, digital tools, and literacy practices. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. (Ed.). (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdiviezo, L. (2009). Bilingual intercultural education in indigenous schools: An ethnography of teacher interpretations of government policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wette, R. (2011). Meeting curriculum, learning and settlement needs: Teachers’ use of materials in courses for adult migrants. TESOL in Context, 21(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., & Renold, E. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf.Google Scholar
Yakhontova, T. (2001). Textbooks, contexts, and learners. English for Specific Purposes, 20(Suppl. 1), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Hu, G. (2010). Between intended and enacted curricula: Three teachers and a mandated curricular reform in mainland China. In Menken, K., & Garcia, O. (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 123–142). Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar