Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:37:34.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2010

Carmen Muñoz  and
David Singleton
Carmen Muñoz
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona, Spainmunoz@ub.edu
David Singleton
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin, Irelanddsnglton@tcd.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses age-related attainment effects in second language acquisition, posing the question of whether such effects are to be explained in terms of a Critical Period with a predictable and abrupt offset point or in terms of the impact of a wider range of factors. It attempts to explore this question by focusing on four discussion points in the current debate: (i) the wide use of native-speaker behaviour as the key L2 attainment yardstick; (ii) the degree of compatibility of prevailing views regarding the notion of a critical period for L2 acquisition; (iii) the relative narrowness of much research in this area, where age of L2 onset is often regarded as the crucial if not the only critical variable; and (iv) insights relative to maturational constraints on language acquisition offered by recent brain research. The article concludes that a loosening of the association between ultimate L2 attainment research and Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) issues would shed more light on L2 attainment in terms both of the comprehensiveness and of the acuity of the insights which would result.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30.4, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception vs. linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica 128, 466–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abutalebi, J. & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20.3, 242–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almli, C. R. & Finger, S. (1987). Neural insult and critical period concepts. In Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 123–143.Google Scholar
Álvarez, E. (2006). Rate and route of acquisition in EFL narrative development at different ages. In Muñoz, C. (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreou, G. & Galantomos, I. (2009). The native speaker ideal in foreign language teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 6.2, 201–208.Google Scholar
Aram, D., Bates, E., Eisele, J., Fenson, J., Nass, R., Thal, D. & Trauner, D. (1997). From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology 13.3, 275–343.Google Scholar
Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S. & Oh, J. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13.3, 238–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, D. B. Jr. (2002). Are critical periods critical for early childhood education? The role of timing in early childhood pedagogy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 17.3, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A. (2009). The language-learning brain. In Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. (eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 65–80.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13.2, 116–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2002). On the reliability of robustness: A reply to DeKeyser. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24.3, 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second language acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, (ed.), 161–181.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68.4, 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1999). Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In Davies, A. & Elder, C. (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. London: Blackwell, 82–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning 56.1, 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. & Paik, J. (2008). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In Spolsky, B. & Hult, F. (eds.), Handbook of educational linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 Learners. In Birdsong, (ed.), 133–159.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (2003). Effets de l'âge sur l'acquisition de la prononciation d'une seconde langue. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 18, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S. & Van Der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica 54.2, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B. & Schils, E. (1995). Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language: A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton, & Lengyel, (eds.), 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., Schils, B. & E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19.4, 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briellmann, R. S., Saling, M. M., Connell, A. B., Waites, A. B., Abbott, D. F. & Jackson, G. D. (2004). A high-field functional MRI study of quadrilingual subjects. Brain and Language 89, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broca, P. (1861). Perte de la parole, ramolissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletin de la Societé d'Anthropologie 11, 235–237.Google Scholar
Burstall, C. (1975). Primary French in the balance. Foreign Language Annals 10.3, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. (2009). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning 59.3, 687–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2010). The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics, 31 (3), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2002). Age differences in foreign language learning. I. T. L. Review of Applied Linguistics, 135–136, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2003). Facteurs determinant l'acquisition d'une L3: âge, développement cognitif et milieu. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 18, 37–51.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F. (1998). Psycholinguistic perspectives on multilingualism and multilingual education. In Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F., (eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee, M. W. L., Tan, E. W. L. & Thiel, T. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience 19.8, 3050–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chee, M. W. L., Hon, N., Ling Lee, H. & Soon, C. S. (2001). Relative language proficiency modulates BOLD signal change when bilinguals perform semantic judgments. NeuroImage 13.6, 1155–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christophersen, P. (1988). Native speakers and world English. English Today 4.3, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugani, H. T., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Juhasz, C., Nagy, F. & Chugani, D. C. (2001). Local brain functional activity following early deprivation: A study of post-institutionalized Romanian orphans. NeuroImage 14.6, 1290–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 27.1, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1992). Evidence for multi-competence. Language Learning 42.4, 557–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1995). Multicompetence and effects of age. In Singleton, & Lengyel, (eds.), 51–56.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33.2, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2002). Background to the L2 user. In Cook, V. (ed.), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (ed.) (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (ed.) (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2006). Interlanguage, multi-competence and the problem of the ‘second language’. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata 6.3, 39–52.Google Scholar
Cook, V. & Newson, M. (2007). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An introduction. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism 19, 198–203.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day ‘wild child’. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2004) The native speaker in applied linguistics. In Davies, A. & Elder, C. (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (2000). Psycholinguistics in applied linguistics: Trends and perpectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (2004). The multilingual lexicon: modelling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism 1.1, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22.4, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003a). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, & Long, (eds.), 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003b). Confusion about confounding: The critical period and other age-related aspects of second language learning. Paper presented at ELIA VIII (Encuentros de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada), ‘El factor edad en la adquisición y enseñanza de L2’, Seville.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2006). A critique of recent arguments against the critical period hypothesis. In Abello-Contesse, C., Chacón-Beltrán, R., López-Jiménez, M. D. & Torreblanca-López, M. M. (eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching. Bern: Peter Lang, 49–58.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I. & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 413–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the Critical Period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & DeGroot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 88–108.Google Scholar
Ding, G. S., Perry, C., Peng, D. L., Ma, L., Li, D. J. & Xu, S. Y. et al. (2003). Neural mechanisms underlying semantic and orthographic processing in Chinese-English bilinguals. NeuroReport 14, 1557–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.) (2003). Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fabbro, F. (1999). The neurolinguistics of bilingualism: An introduction. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fabbro, F. (2002). The neurolinguistics of L2 users. In Cook, V. (ed.), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. (2009). Grammatical processing of spoken language in child and adult language learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 38.3, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, (ed.), 101–131.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T. & Rohde, A. (eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 217–244.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, & Young-Scholten, (eds.), 175–190.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H. & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics 34.2, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M. & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 25.2, 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23.4, 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26.1, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A. & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106.5, 2973–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A. & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics 23.4, 567–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J. & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication 16.1, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. S. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation. Psychological Bulletin 125.2, 193–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P. & Segalowitz, N. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26.2, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Lecumberri, M. L. & Gallardo, F. (2003). English FL pronunciation in school students of different ages. In Mayo, García & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 95–135.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In Mayo, García & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 94–114.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. & García Lecumberri, M. L. (eds.) (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and field work. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition. In van Hout, R., Hulk, A., Kuiken, F. & Towell, R. (eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E. & Loftin, J. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 28.1, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. & Indefrey, P. (eds.) (2006). The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. & Wiley, E. W. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science 14.1, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamers, J. F. & Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. (1997). The partial accessibility of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13.2, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, A. B. (2008). The limits of eventual attainment in adult-onset second language acquisition. Ed.D. Dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Hernández, A. E., Dapretto, M., Mazziotta, J. & Bookheimer, S. (2001). Language switching and language representation in Spanish–English bilinguals: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 14, 510–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, J. (1970). Foreign accents, language acquisition and cerebral dominance revisited. Language Learning 20.2, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of non-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals. New York: Elsevier, 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica 54.2, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003a). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, & Long, (eds.), 539–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003b). Âge de l'exposition initiale et niveau terminal chez les locuteurs du suédois L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 18, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Park, H.-S. (2009). Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12.2, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illes, J., Francis, W. S., Desmond, J. E., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Glover, G. H., Poldrack, R., Lee, C. J. & Wagner, A. D. (1999). Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain and Language 70.3, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? In Gullberg, & Indefrey, (eds.), 279–304.Google Scholar
Ioup, G. (1995). Evaluating the need for input enhancement in post-critical period language acquisition. In Singleton, & Lengyel, (eds.), 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., Tigi, M. & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16.1, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Haji, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., Horie, K., Sato, S. & Kawashima, R. (2007). Effect of syntactic similarity on cortical activation during second language processing: A comparison of English and Japanese among native Korean trilinguals. Human Brain Mapping 28.3, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, G. & Aaronson, D. (1999). Age differences in second language acquisition. The dominant language switch and maintenance hypothesis. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 301–312. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., Aaronson, D. & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 23.4, 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology 21.1, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. E. (1995). Contradictions and unanswered questions in the Genie case: A fresh look at the linguistic evidence. Language and Communication 15.3, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalberer, U. (2007). Rate of L2 acquisition and the influence of instruction time on achievement. M.Ed. thesis. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. (1994). On language memoir. In Bammer, A. (ed.), Displacements. Cultural identities in question. Bloomington, IA: Indiana University Press, 59–70.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1995). Age before beauty: Johnson and Newport revisited. In Eubank, L., Selinker, L. & Sharwood Smith, M. (eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M. & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature 388 (6638), 171–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinsella, C. (2009). An investigation into the proficiency of successful late learners of French. Ph.D. dissertation. Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Kouritzin, S. G. (1999). Face[t]s of first language loss. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., Long, M. & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 9, 573–582. Reprinted in S. D. Krashen, R. C. Scarcella & M. H. Long (eds.) (1982), Child–adult differences in second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Language and Memory 33.2, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E. (1975). Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In Wolfgang, A. (ed.), Education of immigrant students. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 55–83.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research 24.1, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D. & Doiz, A. (2003). Maturational constraints on foreign-language written production. In Mayo, García & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 136–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llanes, À. (2010). Children and adults learning English in a study abroad context. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12.3, 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43.4, 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lundy, J. E. B. (1999). Theory of mind development in deaf children. Perspectives in Education and Deafness 18.1, 1–5.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics 21.3, 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D. & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica 58.1–2, 103–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, R. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, Å. (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 463–478.Google Scholar
Marinova-Todd, S. H. (2003). Know your grammar: What the knowledge of syntax and morphology in an L2 reveals about the critical period for second/foreign language acquisition. In García, Mayo & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 59–73.Google Scholar
Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B. & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 34.1, 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martohardjono, G. & Flynn, S. (1995). Is there an age factor for Universal Grammar? In Singleton, & Lengyel, (eds.), 135–153.Google Scholar
Marx, N. (2002). Never quite a ‘native speaker’: Accent and identity in the L2 and the L1. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 59.2, 264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36.6, 1258–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. I. & Eichen, E. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 30.4, 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miralpeix, I. (2006). Age and vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language. In Muñoz, (ed.), 89–106.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd edn.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism. Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2010). How similar are adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order. Applied Psycholinguistics 31.1, 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25.3, 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C. (2006). Age effects on oral fluency development. In Muñoz, (ed.), 65–88.Google Scholar
Morford, J. P. & Mayberry, R. I. (2000). A reexamination of ‘early exposure’ and its implications for language acquisition by eye. In Chamberlain, C., Morford, J. & Mayberry, R. I. (eds.), Language acquisition by eye. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 111–128.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21.1, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition. An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2005). Formal and informal experiential realms in German as a foreign language: A preliminary investigation. Foreign Language Annals 38.3, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In Piske, & Young-Scholten, (eds.), 159–174.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2003). Variation in oral skills development and age of onset. In Mayo, García & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 101–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (ed.) (2006a). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2006b). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In Muñoz, (ed.), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008a). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics 24.4, 578–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008b). Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 46.3, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (in press). Input in foreign language learning: more significant than starting age? In Howard, M. (ed.), International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Monographic issue, Input Perspectives on the Role of Learning Context in SLA.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D. (2007). Foreign accent in advanced learners: two successful profiles. The EUROSLA Yearbook 7, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navés, T., Torras, M. R. & Celaya, M. L. (2003). Long-term effects of an earlier start. An analysis of EFL written production. The EUROSLA-Yearbook, 103–130.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. (2000). The Critical Period Hypothesis reconsidered: Successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 38.2, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. & Nagato, N. (1974) The long-term effect of FLES: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal 58.1–2, 15–19.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2010) The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary presentation given at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) 2010. Atlanta, GA March.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C. & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learner, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. In Gullberg, & Indefrey, (eds.), 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex 13.2, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmen, M.-J., Bongaerts, T. & Schils, E. (1997). L'authenticité de la prononciation dans l'acquisition d'une langue étrangère au-delà de la période critique: Des apprenants parvenus à un niveau très avancé en français. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 9, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism. In Ellis, N. (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of second languages. London: Academic Press, 393–419.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–178.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perales, S., García Mayo, M. P. & Liceras, J. M. (2004). The acquisition of English sentential negation by bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children: The age factor in an institutional setting. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR, May 1–4.Google Scholar
Perani, D. & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15.2, 202–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F. et al. (2003). The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping 19.3, 170–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, C. C. & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation, and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 36.3, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PillaiJ., J. Araque J., J. Araque, Allison, J., Sethuraman, S., Loring, D., Thiruvaiyaru, D., Ison, C. B., Balan, A. & Lavin, T. (2003). Functional MRI study of semantic and phonological language processing in bilingual subjects: Preliminary findings. NeuroImage 19, 565–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6.2, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A. & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29.2, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M. (eds.) (2009). Input matters. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Reichle, R. V. (2010a). The Critical Period Hypothesis: Evidence from information structural processing in French. In Arabski, J. & Wojtaszek, A. (eds.), Neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives on SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 17–29.Google Scholar
Reichle, R. V. (2010b). Judgments of information structure in L2 French: Nativelike performance and the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 48.1, 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2008). Why all counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis is not equal or problematic. Language and Linguistics Compass 2.6, 1063–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruben, R. J. (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngologica 117.2, 202–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueschemeyer, S. A., Zysset, S. & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Native and non-native reading of sentences: An fMRI experiment. NeuroImage 31, 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L. (2003). Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (2005). The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schick, B. & Gale, E. (1997). The relationship between theory of mind and language skills in deaf children. Paper presented at the Colorado Symposium on Deafness, October 1997, Copper Mountain, CO.Google Scholar
Scoresby-Jackson, R. (1867). Case of aphasia with right hemiplegia. Edinburgh Medical Journal 12, 696–706.Google ScholarPubMed
Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the Critical Period Hypothesis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (2006). Age, acquisition, and accent. In Abello-Contesse, C., Chacón-Beltrán, R., López-Jiménez, M. D. & Torreblanca-López, M. M. (eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching. Bern: Peter Lang, 31–48.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (1995a). A critical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In Singleton, & Lengyel, (eds.), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. (1995b). Second languages in the primary school: The age factor dimension. Teanga: The Irish Yearbook of Applied Linguistics 15, 155–166.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (2005). The Critical Period Hypothesis: A coat of many colours. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43.4, 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (eds.) (1995). The age factor in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. & Leśniewska, J. (2009). Age and SLA: research highways and byeways. In Pawlak, M. (ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. Poznań-Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press, 109–124.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquistion: The age factor (2nd ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, J. L. & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology 49.4, 370–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. (2002). Second language learners’ contributions to our understanding of languages of the brain. In Galaburda, A. & Kosslyn, S. (eds.), Languages of the brain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. (2006). The age-length-onset problems in research on second language acquisition among immigrants. Language Learning 56.4, 671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, L. A. & Sabourin, L. (2005). Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43.4, 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2001). Sensitive periods in attachment? In Bailey, D. B. Jr., Bruer, J. T., Symons, F. J. & Lichtman, J. W. (eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods, Baltimore: Brookes, 83–106.Google Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M. & Kan, I. P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron 23.3, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torras, M. R., Navés, T., Celaya, M. L., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2006). Age and IL development in writing. In Muñoz, (ed.), 156–182.Google Scholar
Tragant, E. & Victori, M. (2006). Reported strategy use and age. In Muñoz, (ed.), 208–236.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92.1–2, 231–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 141–178.Google Scholar
Urponen, M. I. (2004). Ultimate attainment in postpuberty second language acquisition. Boston, MA: Boston University.Google Scholar
Uylings, H. B. M. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of ‘critical’ or ‘sensitive’ periods. In Gullberg, & Indefrey, (eds.), 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victori, M. & Tragant, E. (2003). Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL learners. In Mayo, García & Lecumberri, García (eds.), 182–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S. F., Villringer, A. & Perani, D. (2003). Early setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual brain. Neuron 37.1, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C. M. & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8.3, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L. & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12.3, 233–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E. W., Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (2005). New approaches to using census data to test the Critical-Period Hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science 16.4, 341–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winitz, H., Gillespie, B. & Starcev, J. (1995). The development of English speech patterns of a 7-year-old Polish-speaking child. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24.2, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolfe, T., Want, S. C. & Siegal, M. (2002). Signposts to development: Theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development 73.3, 768–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, A. (2008). The puzzle of language learning: From child's play to ‘linguaphobia’. Language Teaching 41.2, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar