Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T10:16:57.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2011

Ernesto Macaro ,
Zöe Handley  and
Catherine Walter
Ernesto Macaro
Affiliation:
University of Oxfordernesto.macaro@education.ox.ac.uk
Zöe Handley
Affiliation:
University of Oxfordernesto.macaro@education.ox.ac.uk
Catherine Walter
Affiliation:
University of Oxfordernesto.macaro@education.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After explaining why consideration of the use of technology in second language (L2) teaching in the primary and secondary sectors is necessary, this systematic review presents a keyword map of 117 studies of technology in L2 learning since 1990. It reveals that research effort in these educational sectors has increased in line with technological developments and there have been important differences between the primary and secondary sectors in the adoption of applications. There then follows an in-depth review of 47 post-2000 studies investigating the efficacy of technology in the teaching of L2 English. It asks what technology has been used and why, what evidence there is that technology facilitates language learning, and what other insights can be drawn from the research in this field. The evidence that technology has a direct beneficial impact on linguistic outcomes is slight and inconclusive, but it may impact indirectly and positively on learner attitudes and behaviours and may promote collaboration. On the whole, the research reviewed lacked the quality that would reassure practitioners and policy-makers that technological investment is warranted. We argue that future research needs to provide a tighter link between technological applications, Second Language Acquisition (SLA) theory, and learning outcomes.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 1 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

†Abbott, J. A., Walker, C. A., Zhuo, F., Faris, S., Nedeff, A. R., Oaks, R., Webb-Dempsey, J. & Steel, S. (1998). A hypermedia action research project: Asian elementary students as decision-makers. Computers in the Schools 14.3–4, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Aharony, N. (2006). The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an internet environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology 76.4, 851–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allum, P. (2002). CALL and the classroom: The case for comparative research. ReCALL 14.1, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Almekhlafi, A. G. (2006a). Effectiveness of interactive multimedia environment on language acquisition skills of 6th grade students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Instructional Media 33.4, 427–441.Google Scholar
†Almekhlafi, A. G. (2006b). The effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on United Arab Emirates English as a Foreign Language (EFL) school students’ achievement and attitude. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 17.2, 121–142.Google Scholar
†Anderson, J. (2001). Web publishing in non-Roman scripts: Effects on the writing process. Language and Education 15.4, 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Austin, R. & Mendlick, F. (1993). E-mail in modern language development. ReCALL 9. Nov, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Baten, L., Ricker, M. E. & Deceuninck, I. (1999). WebSiteStories (WST): Evaluating works of art. Intercultural content-based language learning via internet. ReCALL 11.3, 4–12.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2003). CALL – Past, present and future. System, 31.1, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals 25.5, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning (2nd edn). London: Longman.Google Scholar
†Black, R. (2010). Online fan fiction and critical media literacy. Journal of Computing and Teacher Education 26.2, 75–80.Google Scholar
†Bueno, K. & Nelson, W. (1993). Collaborative second language learning with a contextualized computer environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2.2, 177–208.Google Scholar
†Cardillo, D. S. (1996). Using a foreign film to improve second language proficiency: Video vs. interactive multimedia. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 25.2, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Carel, S. (1999). Developing awareness of French pragmatics: A case study of students’ interactive use of a foreign language multimedia program. Journal of Educational Computing Research 20.1, 11–24.Google Scholar
‡Chandrasegaran, A. & Kong, K. M. C. (2006). Stance-taking and stance-support in students’ online forum discussion. Linguistics and Education 17.4, 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Chang, C.-W. & Chen, G.-D. (2010). Using a humanoid robot to develop a dialogue-based interactive learning environment for elementary foreign language classrooms. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 21.2, 215–235.Google Scholar
†Chang, C.-W., Lee, J.-H., Chao, P.-Y., Wang, C.-Y. & Chen, G.-D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching English as a second language in primary school. Educational Technology & Society 13.2, 13–24.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer-assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly 20.1, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Chen, C.-M. & Li, Y.-L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments 18.4, 341–364.Google Scholar
‡Chen, J.-M., Chen, M.-C. & Sun, Y. (2010). A novel approach for enhancing student reading comprehension and assisting teacher assessment of literacy. Computers & Education 55.3, 1367–1382.Google Scholar
†Choi, J. (2009). Asian English language learners’ identity construction in an after school literacy site. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 19.1, 130–161.Google Scholar
†Cohen, R. (1993). The use of voice synthesizer in the discovery of the written language by young children. Computers & Education 21.1–2, 25–30.Google Scholar
‡Coniam, D. & Wong, R. (2004). Internet relay chat as a tool in the autonomous development of ESL learners’ English language ability: An exploratory study. System 32.3, 321–335.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1998). e-Lective language learning: Design of a computer-assisted text-based ESL/EFL learning system. TESOL Journal 7.3, 18–21.Google Scholar
‡Dekhinet, R., Topping, K., Duran, D. & Blanch, S. (2008). Let me learn with my peers online! Foreign language learning through reciprocal peer tutoring. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 4.3.Google Scholar
Delcloque, P. (2000). The history of CALL web exhibition. www.eurocall-languages.org/resources/history_of_call.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, P. (1991) The effectiveness research on computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In Dunkel, P. (ed.). Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House, 5–35.Google Scholar
Dyned, (2011). E-Lective. Dyned. www.dyned.com/products/elGoogle Scholar
†Ehsani, F., Bernstein, J. & Najmi, A. (2000). An interactive dialog system for learning Japanese. Speech Communication 30.2–3, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPPI-Centre March (2007). EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
†Espada, A. B. C., Garcia, M. R., Fuentes, A. C. & Gomez, E. M. D. (2006). Developing adaptive systems at early stages of children's foreign language development. ReCALL 18.1, 45–62.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research – Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18.1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Fidaoui, D., Bahous, R. & Bacha, N. (2010). CALL in Lebanese elementary ESL writing classrooms. Computer-Assisted Language Learning 23.2, 151–168.Google Scholar
†Freeman, B. & Crawford, L. (2008). Creating a middle school mathematics curriculum for English-language learners. Remedial and Special Education 29.1, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Gaine, C. & Salazar Noguera, J. (2006). ICT, language learning and intercultural challenge. VIAL – Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3, 27–57.Google Scholar
†Ganszauge, M., Hult, J., Sajavaara, K. & Konttinen, R. (1994). The computer in the English language classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 38.2, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. Modern Language Journal 93.s1, 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goolsbee, A. & Guryan, J. (2006). World wide wonder? Measuring the (non-)impact of Internet subsidies to public schools. Education Next 6.1, 61–65.Google Scholar
Governo Italiano (2009). Presidenza del consiglio dei ministri. Il piano e-government 2012. http://195.66.10.19/GovernoInforma/Dossier/piano_e_gov_2012/Google Scholar
‡Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning & Technology 7.1, 46–70.Google Scholar
†Greifnieder, U. (1995). The influence of audio support on the effectiveness of CALL. ReCALL 7.2, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Herselman, M. E. (1999). South African resource-deprived learners benefit from CALL through the medium of computer games. Computer Assisted Language Learning 12.3, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Ho, C., Rappa, N. & Chee, Y. S. (2009). Designing and implementing virtual enactive role play and structured argumentation: Promises and pitfalls. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22.5, 381–408.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B. & Cope, J. (1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal 70.2, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18.5, 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Jakobsdottir, S. & Hooper, S. (1995). Computer-assisted foreign language learning: Effects of text, context, and gender on listening comprehension and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development 43.4, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Jaspers, J. G. M., Kanselaar, G. & Kok, W. A. M. (1993). Productive language use with IT'S ENGLISH. Computers & Education 21.1–2, 67–75.Google Scholar
†Jia, J. (2009). CSIEC: A computer-assisted English learning chatbot based on textual knowledge and reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 22.4, 249–255.Google Scholar
†Jia, J. & Chen, W. (2009). The further development of CSIEC project driven by application and evaluation in English education. British Journal of Educational Technology 40.5, 901–918.Google Scholar
†Jiyou, J. (2009). An AI framework to teach English as a foreign language: CSIEC. AI Magazine 30.2, 59–71.Google Scholar
‡Johns, T. F., Hsingchin, L. & Lixun, W. (2008). Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children's literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21.5, 483–506.Google Scholar
†Johnston, J. & Milne, L. (1995). Scaffolding second language communicative discourse with teacher-controlled multimedia. Foreign Language Annals 28.3, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, U. (2005). CALL: Past, present, and future – A bibliometric approach. ReCALL 17.1, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Kang, S.-H. (1995). The effects of a context-embedded approach to second-language vocabulary learning. System 23.1, 43–55.Google Scholar
†Kang, S.-H. & Dennis, J. R. (1995). The effects of computer-enhanced vocabulary lessons on achievement of ESL grade school children. Computers in the Schools 11.3, 25–35.Google Scholar
†Kettemann, B. (1995). How effective is CALL in ELT? ReCALL 7.1, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Kim, D. & Gilman, D. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society 11.3, 114–126.Google Scholar
Kindersite (2009). Kindersite: Where children play and teachers learn. Kindersite. Retrieved from www.kindersite.org.Google Scholar
†Knee, R., Cafolla, R. & Holler, K. (2000). Integrating standards-based education in a telecommunications project: A case study. Computers in the Schools 16.2, 59–72.Google Scholar
‡Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F. & Lam, A. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology 4.2, 78–104.Google Scholar
‡Lai, Y.-S., Tsai, H.-H. & Yu, P.-T. (2009). A multimedia English learning system using HMMs to improve phonemic awareness for English learning. Educational Technology & Society 12.3, 266–281.Google Scholar
†Lam, F. S. & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The computer vs. the pen: A comparative study of word processing in a Hong Kong secondary classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 8.1, 75–92.Google Scholar
†Lam, W. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology 8.3, 44–65.Google Scholar
‡Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T. & Chang, K.-E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology 11.3, 130–151.Google Scholar
‡Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T. & Chang, K.-E. (2009). Let us read together: Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading system. Computers & Education 53.4, 1188–1198.Google Scholar
†Langman, J. & Fies, C. (2010). Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners. Language and Education 24.2, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 93. Focus Issue, 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. & Hubbard, P. (2005) Why call CALL ‘CALL’? Computer Assisted Language Learning 18.3, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Li, J. (2009). The evolution of vocabulary learning strategies in a computer-mediated reading environment. CALICO Journal 27.1, 118–146.Google Scholar
‡Li, J. (2010). Learning vocabulary via computer-assisted scaffolding for text processing. Computer-Assisted Language Learning 23.2, 253–275.Google Scholar
†Liaw, M.-L. (1997). An analysis of ESL children's verbal interaction during computer book reading. Computers in the Schools 13.3–4, 55–73.Google Scholar
†Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D. & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtual environments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in a distributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40.3, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Lim, C. P. (2008). Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning mathematics, english and science as a global citizen. Computers & Education 51.3, 1073–1093.Google Scholar
‡Lin, J. M.-C. & Wu, Y.-J. (2010). Netbooks in sixth-grade English language classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26.7, 1062–1074.Google Scholar
‡Liu, T.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25.6, 515–527.Google Scholar
†Liu, I.-F., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Wible, D. & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education 54.2, 600–610.Google Scholar
‡Liu, T.-Y. & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education 55.2, 630–643.Google Scholar
†Lopez, O. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education 54.4, 901–915.Google Scholar
‡Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24.6, 515–525.Google Scholar
†Luck, K. (2008). Web-based foreign language reading: Affective and productive outcomes. CALICO Journal 25.2, 305–325.Google Scholar
‡Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL 20.1, 35–54.Google Scholar
‡Lund, A. & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3.4, 387–412.Google Scholar
‡Mak, B. & Coniam, D. (2008). Using Wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System 36.3, 437–455. Google Scholar
†Matthews-Ayninli, J. & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23.3, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Milton, J. & Garbi, A. (2000). VIRLAN: Collaborative foreign language learning on the Internet for primary age children: Problems and a solution. Educational Technology & Society 3.3.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, Singapore (2008). MOE launches third masterplan for ICT in education. (Press release). www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2008/08/moe-launches-third-masterplan.phpGoogle Scholar
†Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology 9.1, 29–45.Google Scholar
‡Morton, H. & Jack, M. (2010). Speech interactive computer-assisted language learning: A cross-cultural evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23.4, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Murphy, E. (2009). Online synchronous communication in the second-language classroom. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 35.3, 10–22.Google Scholar
‡Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL 20.1, 3–20.Google Scholar
†Narciss, S. & Koerndle, H. (2008). Benefits and constraints of distributed cognition in foreign language learning: Creating a web-based tourist guide for London. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40.3, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M. & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21.5, 393–408.Google Scholar
‡Ngu, B. H. & Rethinasamy, S. (2006). Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English prepositions. Computers & Education 47.1, 41–55.Google Scholar
†Nutta, J. W., Feyton, C. M., Norwood, A. L., Meros, J., Yoshii, M. & Ducher, J. (2002). Exploring new frontiers: What do computers contribute to teaching foreign languages in elementary school? Foreign Language Annals 35.3, 293–306.Google Scholar
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education) (2002). ICT in schools: Effect of government initiatives. Ofsted, London. www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Education/Curriculum/Information-and-communication-technology/Primary/ICT-in-schools-2002Google Scholar
‡O'Hara, S. & Pritchard, R. (2008). Hypermedia authoring as a vehicle for vocabulary development in middle school English as a second language classrooms. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 82.2, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J. & Lemonnier, F. H. (2005). ‘History of Theatre’ Web sites: A brief history of the writing process in a high school ESL language arts class. Journal of Second Language Writing 14.4, 233–258.Google Scholar
Pederson, K. (1987). Research on CALL. In Smith, W. (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company, 99–131.Google Scholar
‡Peng, H., Fitzgerald, G. & Park, M. (2006). Producing multimedia stories with ESL children: A partnership approach. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 15.3, 261–284.Google Scholar
Philp, J. (2003) Constraints on noticing the gap: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Poulsen, R., Hastings, P. & Allbritton, D. (2007). Tutoring bilingual students with an automated reading tutor that listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26.2, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidencia del Gobierno (2009). PlanE: Plan Español para el estimulo de la economía y el empleo. Capital humano y tecnológico. Escuela 2.0. www.plane.gob.es/escuela-20/Google Scholar
‡Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B. & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Scaffolding English language learners and struggling readers in a universal literacy environment with embedded strategy instruction and vocabulary support. Journal of Literacy Research 39.1, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Ritter, M. (1993). That's us! A book about ourselves: An EFL project with intermediate learners, incorporating the computer as a tool. CALICO Journal 10.4, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Sanaoui, R. & Lapkin, S. (1992). A case study of an FSL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. Canadian Modern Language Review 48.3, 525–552.Google Scholar
‡Sasaki, A. & Takeuchi, O. (2010). EFL students’ vocabulary learning in NS-NNS e-mail interactions: Do they learn new words by imitation? ReCALL 22.1, 70–82.Google Scholar
‡Satar, H. M. & Ozdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. Modern Language Journal 92.4, 595–613.Google Scholar
†Seedhouse, P. (1995). Communicative CALL: Focus on the interaction produced by CALL software. ReCALL 7.2, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Segers, E. & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19.4, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Segers, E. & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21.1, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Silver, N. W. & Repa, J. T. (1993). The effect of word processing on the quality of writing and self-esteem of secondary school English-as-second-language students: Writing without censure. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9.2, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Silverman, R. & Hines, S. (2009). The effects of multimedia enhanced instruction on the vocabulary of English-language learners and non-English-language learners in pre-kindergarten through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology 101.2, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Soares, D. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research 12.4, 517–533.Google Scholar
†Soh, B.-L. & Soon, Y.-P. (1991). English by e-mail: Creating a global classroom via the medium of computer technology. ELT Journal 45.4, 287–292.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL 19.2, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Suh, S., Kim, S. & Kim, N. (2010). Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary English education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26.5, 370–378.Google Scholar
†Svenconis, D. J. & Kerst, S. (1995). Investigating the teaching of second-language vocabulary through semantic mapping in a hypertext environment. CALICO Journal 12.2–3, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Swann, P. (1992). Computer assisted language learning for English as a foreign language. Computers & Education 19.3, 251–266.Google Scholar
‡Tan, K., Mohammed, A. & Saw, K. (2009). Improving school English in Malaysia through participation in online threaded discussion groups. Asian EFL Journal 11.2, 147–162.Google Scholar
†Taylor, A., Lazarus, E. & Cole, R. (2005). Putting languages on the (drop down) menu: Innovative writing frames in modern foreign language teaching. Educational Review 57.4, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Tella, S. (1992). The adoption of international communications networks and electronic mail into foreign language education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 36.4, 303–312.Google Scholar
†Thorne, S. (2009). ‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity. Language Teaching 42.1, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†Trenchs, M. (1996). Writing strategies in a second language: Three case studies of learners using electronic mail. Canadian Modern Language Review 52.3, 464–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Troia, G. A. (2004). Migrant students with limited English proficiency: Can FastForWord Language™ make a difference in their language skills and academic achievement? Remedial and Special Education 25.6, 353–366.Google Scholar
‡Tsou, W., Wang, W. & Li, H.-Y. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners acquire English abstract words. Computers & Education 39.4, 415–428.Google Scholar
‡Tsou, W., Wang, W. & Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling Website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education 47.1, 17–28.Google Scholar
†Tzortzidou, S. & Hassapis, G. (2001). Assessment of the reading skill improvement in the computer-assisted teaching of a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies 6.3, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2009). ICT in Education: China. www.unescobkk.org/education/ict/themes/policy/regional-country-overviews/china/Google Scholar
†Van Bussel, F. J. J. (1994). Design rules for computer-aided learning of vocabulary items in a second language. Computers in Human Behavior 10.1, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡Verdugo, D. R. & Belmonte, I. A. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology 11.1, 87–101.Google Scholar
†Verhallen, M. J. A. J., Bus, A. G. & Jong, M. T. (2006). The promise of multimedia stories for kindergarten children at risk. Journal of Educational Psychology 98.2, 410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I. & Kuiper, E. (2005). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils’ use of ICT in primary and secondary education, Computers & Education 24.1, 35–55.Google Scholar
†Ward, M. (2004). The additional uses of CALL in the endangered language context. ReCALL 16.2, 345–359.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In Fotos, S. (ed.), Multimedia language teaching. Tokyo: Logos International, 3–20.Google Scholar
‡Wong, L.-H. & Looi, C.-K. (2010). Vocabulary learning by mobile-assisted authentic content creation and social meaning-making: Two case studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26.5, 421–433.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery – revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
†Yang, S. C. & Chen, Y.-J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior 23.1, 860–879.Google Scholar
†Yang, J., Chen, C. & Jeng, M. (2010). Integrating video-capture virtual reality technology into a physcially interactive learning environment for English learning. Computers & Education 55.3, 1346–1356.Google Scholar
‡Yanqing, S. & Qi, D. (2004). An experiment on supporting children's English vocabulary learning in multimedia context. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17.2, 131–147.Google Scholar
‡Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19.4, 447–461.Google Scholar
‡Young, S. S.-C., Wang, Y. H. & Jang, J.-S. R. (2010). Exploring perceptions of integrating tangible learning companions in learning English conversation. British Journal of Educational Technology 41.5, E78–E83.Google Scholar
‡Yun, S., BaekP. C. Miller, Y. P. C. Miller, Y., Jung, J. & Ko, M. (2008). Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in Web-based second language learning: An examination by item and feedback type. Educational Technology & Society 11.4, 158–172.Google Scholar
†Zha, S., Kelly, P., Park, M. K. & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). An investigation of communicative competence of ESL students using electronic discussion boards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38.3, 349–367.Google Scholar
‡Zhang, T., Gao, T., Ring, G. & Zhang, W. (2007). Using online discussion forums to assist a traditional English class. International Journal on E-Learning 6.4, 623–643.Google Scholar
‡Zheng, D., Young, M., Brewer, R. & Wagner, M. (2009). Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds. CALICO Journal 27.1, 205–231Google Scholar