Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T16:48:54.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi: Developing a Three-Dimensional Model and Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Ying Chen ,
Ray Friedman ,
Enhai Yu ,
Weihua Fang  and
Xinping Lu
Ying Chen
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, USA
Ray Friedman
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, USA
Enhai Yu
Affiliation:
North China Electric Power University, China
Weihua Fang
Affiliation:
Beihang University, China
Xinping Lu
Affiliation:
Capital University of Economics and Business, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a three-dimensional concept of supervisor-subordinate guanxi. This concept includes affective attachment, personal-life inclusion, and deference to supervisor. Based on this concept, we conducted three studies to develop and validate a three-dimensional supervisor-subordinate guanxi measure and to examine its relationship with related constructs, such as leader-member exchange. Results from Study 1 and Study 2 provide evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the scale, while Study 3 demonstrates the scale's incremental validity and replicates results from Study 2. Furthermore, in Study 3, we found that the three dimensions of supervisor-subordinate guanxi had different significant effects on commitment, turnover intention, and procedural justice, providing further evidence of criterion-related validity. Overall, these empirical results provide support for our three-dimensional model of supervisor-subordinate guanxi.

Keywords

guanxi scaleleader-member exchangesupervisor-subordinate guanxi关系量表领导-成员交换上下级关系
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 375 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bian, Y. 2006. Guanxi. In Beckert, J. & Zafirovski, M. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of economic sociology: 312–314. New York: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. 1986. The social psychology of Chinese people. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people: 213–266. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camman, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. 1979. The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Chen, Y., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2): 200–209.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (3): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., & Peng, S. Q. 2008. Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between Chinese coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 63–80.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. 2008. Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi: A multi-level analysis of guanxi and procedural justice. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Association for Chinese Management Research, Guangzhou, China, 19-22 June 2008.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., & Francesco, A. 2000. Employee demography, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in China: Do cultural difference matter? Human Relations, 53(6): 869–887.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Farh, J. L., Chang, H. F., & Hsu, W. L. 2002. Gunaxi, zhoungcheng, compentence and managerial behavior in the Chinese context. The Journal of Chinese Psychology, 44(2): 151–166.Google Scholar
Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. 1987. Chinese subjects’ dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 18(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
Chow, I., & Ng, I. 2004. The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25(7): 1075–1093.Google Scholar
Clark, M., & Finkel, F. 2005. Willingness to express emotion: The impact of relationship type, communal orientation, and their interaction. Personal Relationship, 12(2): 169–180.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. 1979. Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1): 12–24.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. 1993. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What is and is-not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6): 684–691.Google Scholar
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. 1986. Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(2): 618–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. 2006. Collectivism as a moderator of response to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Farh, J., Earley, P., & Lin, S. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and extra-role behavior in Chinese Society. Administration Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421–444.Google Scholar
Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X. T. 1947/1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. 1991. The cultural relativity of selfish individualism: Anthropological evidence that humans are inherently sociable. In Clark, M. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Altruism and prosocial behavior, vol. 12: 176–214. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. 1992. The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4): 689–723.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J. 2007. Has a network theory of organizational behavior lived up to its promises? Management and Organization Review, 3(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China's economic transition. The China Quarterly, 153: 254–282.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1991. Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1–55.Google Scholar
Hui, C., & Graen, G. 1997. Guanxi and professional leadership in contemporary Sino-American joint ventures in mainland China. Leadership Quarterly, 8(4): 451–465.Google Scholar
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or the people? Organization Science, 15(2): 232–240.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 944–974.Google Scholar
James, L., Mulaik, S., & Brett, J. 1982. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Khatri, K. 2007. A taxonomy of supervisor—subordinate exchange across cultures. Proceedings of the 67th Academy of Management Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 3-8 August 2007.Google Scholar
Kipnis, A. B. 1997. Producing guanxi: Sentiment, self, and subculture in a north China village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Wang, D. X., & Wang, L. H. 2000. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4): 715–730.Google Scholar
Lee, C., & Farh, J. 1999. The effects of gender in organizational justice perception. Journal of organizational behavior, 20(1): 133–143.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M. W. 2001. When is criticism not constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations, 54(9): 1155–1187.Google Scholar
Lin, M. 2002. The effects of supervisors’ differential guanxi on leadership behaviors and effectiveness. Unpublished Master's thesis, National Zhongshan University, Taipei.Google Scholar
Liden, R., & Maslyn, J. 1998. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1): 43–72.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224–253.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationships between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6): 845–855.Google Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2): 224–247.Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W., & Sharma, S. 2003. Scaling procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E., & Scandura, T. 2006. Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2): 264–279.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y, & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531–544.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 56–79.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1994. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5): 850–863.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1904/1930. Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Winchester, MA: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Wetherill, J. 1986. Regression analysis with applications. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Wong, C., Tinsley, C., Law, K., & Mobley, W. H. 2003. Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of guanxi. Journal of Psychology Chinese Societies, 4(1): 43–69.Google Scholar
Yang, C. F. 1988. Familialism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In Sinha, D. & Kao, H. S. R. (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives: 93–123. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yang, C. F. 2001. A critical review of the conceptualization of guanxi and renqing. In Yang, C. F. (Ed.), The interpersonal relationship, affection, and trust of the Chinese: From an interactional perspective: 3–26. Taipei: Yuan Liou Publishing.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. 1992. Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In Yang, K. S. & Yu, A. B. (Eds.), Chinese psychology and behaviour: 87–142. Laurel, Taipei: Kew Gong Book.Google Scholar
Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets. The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, M. M. 2002. The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. China Quarterly, 170: 459–476.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. 2001. One of us (zijiren): A case study on the classification of Chinese guanxi. In Yang, C. F. (Ed.), Interpersonal relationship, affection and trust of Chinese: From an interactional perspective: 131–158. Taipei: Yuan Liou Publishing.Google Scholar
Yi, X. 2002. Guanxi and leader—member exchange in the Chinese context. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar