Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:27:50.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Associated with Discussion of Disasters by Final Year High School Students: An International Cross-sectional Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2015

Tudor A. Codreanu ,
Antonio Celenza  and
Ali A. Rahman Alabdulkarim
Tudor A. Codreanu*
Affiliation:
West Australian Country Health Services, Bunbury and Busselton Hospitals, Critical Care Directorate, Emergency Department, Bunbury, Australia
Antonio Celenza
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Ali A. Rahman Alabdulkarim
Affiliation:
Royal Medical Services, West Riffa, Kingdom of Bahrain
*
Correspondence: Tudor A. Codreanu West Australian Country Health Services Busselton Hospital Emergency Department Locked Bag 3 Busselton 6280, Western Australia E-mail: tudor.codreanu@health.wa.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

The effect on behavioral change of educational programs developed to reduce the community’s disaster informational vulnerability is not known. This study describes the relationship of disaster education, age, sex, and country-specific characteristics with students discussing disasters with friends and family, a measure of proactive behavioral change in disaster preparedness.

Methods

Three thousand eight hundred twenty-nine final year high school students were enrolled in an international, multi-center prospective, cross-sectional study using a pre-validated written questionnaire. In order to obtain information from different educational systems, from countries with different risk of exposure to disasters, and from countries with varied economic development status, students from Bahrain, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Timor-Leste were surveyed. Logistic regression analyses examined the relationship between the likelihood of discussing disasters with friends and family (dependent variable) and a series of independent variables (age, gender, participation in school lessons about disasters, existence of a national disaster educational program, ability to list pertinent example of disasters, country's economic group, and disaster risk index) captured by the questionnaire or available as published data.

Results

There was no statistically significant relationship between age, awareness of one’s surroundings, planning for the future, and foreseeing consequences of events with discussions about potential hazards and risks with friends and/or family. The national educational budget did not have a statistically significant influence. Participants who lived in a low disaster risk and high income Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) country were more likely to discuss disasters. While either school lessons or a national disaster education program had a unique, significant contribution to the model, neither had a better predictive utility.

Conclusions

The predictors (national disaster program, school lessons, gender, ability to list examples of disasters, country’s disaster risk index, and level of economic development), although significant, were not sufficient in predicting disaster discussions amongst teenagers.

CodreanuTA , CelenzaA , AlabdulkarimAAR . Factors Associated with Discussion of Disasters by Final Year High School Students: An International Cross-sectional Survey. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(4):1–9.

Keywords

disaster educationhigh schoolteenagers
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 365 - 373
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Guha-Sapir, D, Below, R, Hoyois, PH. EM-DAT: International Disaster Database. Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. http://www.emdat.be/database. Accessed November 10, 2014.Google Scholar
2. United Nations. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR). Living with risk. A global review of disaster reduction initiatives 2004. IFRC Web site. http://www.ifrc.org/docs/idrl/I1029EN.pdf. Published 2004. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Kurita, T, Nakamura, A, Kodama, M, Sisira, RNC. Tsunami public awareness and the disaster management system of Sri Lanka. Disaster Prev Manage. 2006;15(1):92-110.Google Scholar
4. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: building the resilience for nations and communities to disasters 2005. UNISDR Web site. http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2014.Google Scholar
5. Jaber, A. After the cameras have gone - children in disasters. Plan International Web site. http://plan-international.org/about-plan/resources/publications/emergencies/after-the-cameras-have-gone-children in-disasters. Accessed June 10, 2014.Google Scholar
6. United Nations. The International Framework For Action For The International Decade For Natural Disaster Reduction 1987. UNISDR Web site. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/resolutions-reports/disaster-reduction-mandate?p=3. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
7. United Nations. Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for a Safer World 1994. IFRC Web site. http://www.ifrc.org/Docs/idrl/I248EN.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
8. United Nations. Brussels. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction 2000. UN Web site. http://www.unbrussels.org/agencies/unisdr.html. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
9. United Nations. United Nations Millennium Declaration 2000. UN Web site. http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
10. World Health Organization Geneva. 2013; WHO Web site. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs290/en/. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
11. United Nations. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). 2006 - 2007 World Disaster Reduction Campaign. Disaster risk reduction begins at school. UNISDR Web site. http://www.unisdr.org/2007/campaign/pdf/WDRC-2006-2007-English-fullversion.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2014.Google Scholar
12. Codreanu, T, Celenza, A, Jacobs, I. Does disaster education of teenagers translate into better survival knowledge, knowledge of skills, and adaptive behavioral change? A systematic literature review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(6):1-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. United Nations. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). Governments must recognize their stock of risk MDG Report. UNISDR Web site. www.unisdr.org/archive/28569. Accessed November 12, 2014.Google Scholar
14. Bernstein, DA, Penner, LA, Clarke-Stewart, A, Roy, EJ. Psychology, 9th Edition. Belmont, California USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2012: 500-508.Google Scholar
15. Luciana, M, Conklin, HM, Hooper, CJ, Yarger, RS. The development of nonverbal working memory and executive control processes in adolescents. Child Development. 2005;76:697-712.Google Scholar
16. San Francisco Department of Emergency Management. How would you survive for 72 hours? SFDEM Web site. www.sfgov.org/oes. Accessed June 3, 2010.Google Scholar
17. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, March 2007 and UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Data Centre. United Nations Web site. http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/ReportFolders/ReportFolders.aspx. Accessed June 18, 2014.Google Scholar
18. United Nations. United Nations University (UNU) and Institute for Environment and Human Security Bonn (UNU-EHS). http://www.worldriskreport.com/uploads/media/WorldRiskReport-2011_online_EN.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2014.Google Scholar
19. Razali, NM, Wah, YB.. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Liliefors, and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2011;1:21-22.Google Scholar
20. Park, HM. Univariate analysis and normality test using SAS, Stata, and SPSS. Technical Working Paper, The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing. Indiana University (USA): 2008. http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath. Accessed January 7, 2014.Google Scholar
21. Olympia, RP, Rivera, R, Heverley, S, Anyanwu, U, Gregorits, M. Natural disasters and mass-casualty events affecting children and families: a description of emergency preparedness and the role of the primary care physician. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010;49(7):686-698.Google Scholar
22. Shaw, R, Shiwaku, K, Kobayashi, H, Kobayashi, M. Linking experience, education, perception, and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag. 2004;13(1):39-49.Google Scholar