Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T20:01:13.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correct Voting and Post-Election Regret

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

André Blais
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Anja Kilibarda
Affiliation:
Columbia University

Abstract

Regret is a basic affect associated with individual choice. While much research in organizational science and consumer behavior has assessed the precedents and consequents of regret, little attention has been paid to regret in political science. The present study assesses the relationship between one of the most democratically consequential forms of political behavior—voting—and feelings of regret. We examine the extent to which citizens regret how they voted after doing so and the factors that might lead one individual to be more regretful than another. Relying on surveys in five different countries after 11 regional and national elections, we find not only that political information leads to a decrease in post-election regret, but also that having voted correctly, or having voted in accordance with one’s underlying preferences regardless of information, similarly mitigates regret. The effect of correct voting on regret is greater among the least informed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, André, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2010. “Making Electoral Democracy Work.” Electoral Studies 29: 160170.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Fournier, Patrick, and Nevitte, Neil. 2009. “Information, Visibility and Elections: Why Electoral Outcomes Differ When Voters are Better Informed.” European Journal of Political Research 48: 256280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boen, Filip, Vanbesalaere, Norbert, Pandelaere, Mario, Dewitte, Siegfried, Duriez, Bart, Snauwaert, Boris, Feys, Jos, Dierckx, Vicky, and Van Avermaet, Eddy. 2002. “Politics and Basking-in-Reflected Glory: A Field Study in Flanders.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24 (3): 205214.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Carpini, Michael X. Delli and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Terry and Zeelenberg, Marcel. 2002. “Regret in Decision Making.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (6): 212216.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Andersen, David J., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2008. “An Exploration of Correct Voting in Recent US Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 52 (2): 395411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. 1986. Political Cognition. New Jersey: Erlbaum Hillsdale.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 585599.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 309326.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80 (2) : 505519.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 6376.Google Scholar
O’Cass, Aron and Pecotich, Anthony. 2005. “The Dynamics of Voter Behavior and Influence Processes in Electoral Markets: a Consumer Behavior Perspective.” Journal of Business Research 58 (4): 406413.Google Scholar
Pieters, Rik and Zeelenberg, Marcel. 2005. “On Bad Decisions and Deciding Badly: When Intention-Behaviour Inconsistency is Regrettable.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97 (1): 1830.Google Scholar
Pieters, Rik and Zeelenberg, Marcel. 2007. “A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.1.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 17 (1): 2935.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ritov, Ilana. 1996. “Probability of Regret: Anticipation of Uncertainty Resolution in Choice.” Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66 (2): 228236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, Itamar. 1992. “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Consumer Research 19 (1): 105118.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Phillip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sydney, Scholzman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, Marcel, van Dijk, Wilco W., Van der Pligt, Joop, Manstead, Antony S. R., Van Empelen, Pepijn, and Reinderman, Dimitri. 1998. “Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment.” Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 (2): 117141 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Blais and Kilibarda supplementary material

Appendix

Download Blais and Kilibarda supplementary material(File)
File 82.3 KB

A correction has been issued for this article: