Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T23:05:22.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The French Referendum: The Not So Simple Act of Saying Nay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

Sylvain Brouard  and
Vincent Tiberj
Sylvain Brouard
Affiliation:
CEVIPOF/Sciences Po Paris
Vincent Tiberj
Affiliation:
CEVIPOF/Sciences Po Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the second time in the history of the French Vth Republic, the first having led to the resignation of Charles De Gaulle in 1969, a president lost a national referendum. On May 29, 2005, 54.7% of French voters rejected the European Constitutional Treaty, even though France was one of the major proponents of the European Convention which led to the Constitution's drafting. The victory of the “no” vote had been foreseen, but neither the margin of victory, nor the high turnout (almost 70.5%) were expected. The rejection of the Constitution raised two concerns: the first related to the position of France in Europe, the second to its domestic impact. Why did the French electorate vote as it did? Did voters make up their minds based on national cues, the European issue being generally of little importance even in European elections (Franklin, Marsh, and McLaren 1994; Van der Eijk and Franklin 1996)? Is the referendum result the consequence of a growing anti-European attitude, which could cause considerable damage to the process of EU integration? Will a new cleavage grounded on attitudes to Europe and capable of altering the traditional left-right organization emerge in the French political system?Our warmest thanks to our colleagues, Chantal Barry, Arianne Chebel d'Appolonia, and Manlio Cinnalli for their remarks on and their help with this piece.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 261 - 268
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bélanger, Eric, Michael Lewis-Beck, Jean Chiche, and Vincent Tiberj. 2005. “Party, Ideology and the French Voter: Dynamics from the 2002 Electoral Panel.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bélot, Céline, and Bruno Cautrès. 2004. “ l'Europe, invisible mais omnipésente.” In Le nouveau désordre électoral, eds. Bruno Cautrès and Nonna Mayer. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 119–145.Google Scholar
Bréchon, Pierre. 2004. “Crise de confiance dans les élites politiques.” In Le nouveau désordre électoral, eds. Bruno Cautrès and Nonna Mayer. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 47–70.Google Scholar
Brouard, Sylvain, and Vincent Tiberj. 2005. Français comme les autres? Une enquête auprès des citoyens d'origine maghrébine, africaine et turque. Paris : Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Austin Ranney eds. 1994. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cautrès, Bruno, and Vincent Tiberj. 2005. Une sanction du gouvernement mais pas de l'Europe: Les élections européennes de juin 2004. Paris : Cahiers du CEVIPOF n°41.Google Scholar
Chiche, Jean, Brigitte Le Roux, Pascal Perrineau, and Henry Rouanet. 2000. “L'espace politique des électeurs français à la fin des années 1990.” Revue française de science politique 50 (3) : 463–487.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip, and Roy Pierce. 1993. “Comment on Fleury and Lewis-Beck: ‘Anchoring the French Voter: Ideology versus Party.’” Journal of Politics 55 (4): 1110–1117.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip, and Roy Pierce. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jocelyn, and Nonna Mayer. 2005. “Electorates, New Cleavages and Social Structures.” In Developments in French Politics 3, eds. Allistair Cole, Patrick Le Galès, and Jonah Levy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–54.Google Scholar
Fleury, Christopher, and Michael Lewis-Beck. 1993. “Anchoring the French Voter: Ideology versus Party.” Journal of Politics 55 (4): 1100–1109.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, Michael Marsh, and Lauren McLaren. 1994. “Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht.” Journal of Common Market Studies 32 (4): 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark, Cees Van der Eijk, and Michael Marsh. 1995. “Referendums' Outcome and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” West European Politics 18: 101–117.Google Scholar
Grossman, L. 1995. The Electronic Republic. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kobach, K. 1993. The Referendum. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Laurent, Annie, and Nicholas Sauger. 2005. Le référendum de ratification du traité constitutionnel européen : comprendre le “ Non ” français. Paris: Cahiers du CEVIPOF n°42.Google Scholar
Mayer, Nonna. 1999. Ces Français qui votent FN. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Mayer, Nonna, and Vincent Tiberj. “Issues 2002: Law and Order?” In The French Voter: Before and After the 2002 Election, ed. Michael Lewis-Beck. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 33–46.Google Scholar
Mergier, Alain et al. 2005. Le jour où la France a dit non? Comprendre le référendum du 29 mai 2005. Paris: Fondation Jean-Jaurès-Plon.Google Scholar
Morel, Laurence. 2005. “ Les usages du référendum sous la Cinquième République: un Président en perte d'initiative.” In Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen: comprendre le non français, eds. Annie Laurent and Nicolas Sauger. Paris: Cahier du CEVIPOF n°42, 7–25.Google Scholar
Morel, Laurence. 1996. “ France: Towards a Less Controversial Use of the Referendum?” In The Referendum Experience in Europe, eds. M. Gallagher and P. Uleri. Basington and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Perrineau, Pascal. 2005. “ Le referendum françois du 20 mai 2005.” In Le Vote Européen: 2004–2005, ed. Pascal Perrineau. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 238–240.Google Scholar
Percheron, Annick. 1977. “Ideological Proximity among French Children: Problems of Definition and Measurement.” European Journal of Political Research 5: 53–81.Google Scholar
Piar, Christophe, and Jacques Gerstlé. 2005. “ Le cadrage du référendum sur la Constitution européenne.” In Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen: comprendre le non français, eds. Annie Laurent and Nicolas Sauger. Paris: Cahier du CEVIPOF n°42, 42–73.Google Scholar
Sauger, Nicolas, Sylvain Brouard, and Emiliano Grossman. 2006. Les Français contre l'Europe? Les sens du référendum du 29 mai 2005. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
Schweisguth, Etienne. 2002. “ La dépolitisation en questions.” In La démocratie à l'épreuve: une nouvelle approche de l'opinion des Français, eds. Gérard Grunberg, Nonna Mayer, and Paul Sniderman. Paris: Presse de Sciences Po, 51–86.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark Franklin, eds. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar