Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:50:28.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Louis Fisher: Government and the Academy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

Mitchel A. Sollenberger
Mitchel A. Sollenberger*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A dozen years before this PS symposium, several political scientists came together in a similar manner to honor Louis Fisher's scholarship and highlight his contributions to the discipline (Spitzer 2000). Many wonderful insights and observations were made to shed light on Fisher's versatility and impact. However, that effort missed an opportunity to highlight a key contribution of Fisher's work: a revival of pre-behavioral era functions and concerns within political science. In many ways Fisher is a throwback to a traditional political science approach where scholars did not select subfields or specialties but sought to engage in broad public debates about governing and, most importantly, believed that normative and empirical studies could and should go hand in hand. With the latter approach Fisher has made his most important contribution to political science.

Type
Symposium: Law and (Disciplinary) Order: A Dialogue about Louis Fisher, Constitutionalism, and Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 488 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broder, David S. 2003. “Congress's Cop-out on War,” Washington Post, Dec. 7, B7.Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor. 1965. Presidential Government: The Crucible of Leadership. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. 2006. “Edward S. Corwin as Public Scholar.” In The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, ed. Maveety, Nancy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Professional Ethics, Rights and Freedoms. 2008. “A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science.” Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association. http://www.apsanet.org/media/PDFs/ethicsguideweb.pdf.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. 1929. “The Democratic Dogma and the Future of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 23: 569–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55: 763–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Fisher, Louis. 2004. The Democratic Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1972. President and Congress: Power and Policy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1975. Presidential Spending Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2000. Congressional Abdication on War and Spending. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2002. Religious Liberty in America: Political Safeguards. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2003. “Deciding on War in Iraq: Institutional Failures.” Political Science Quarterly 118: 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2004. Presidential War Power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2005. Military Tribunals & Presidential Powers: American Revolution to the War on Terrorism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2007. Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the President, fifth edition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2008. The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America's Freedoms. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2009. “Political Scientists and the Public Law Tradition.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, eds. Edwards, George G. II and Howell, William G.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2010a. On Appreciating Congress: The People's Branch. Boulder, CO and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2010b. “When Wars Begin: Misleading Statements by Presidents,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40: 171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2011a. American Constitutional Law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2011b. Defending Congress and the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2011c. “Choosing to Be a Practitioner.” Remarks at the National Capital Area Political Science Association in receiving the Walter Beach Pi Sigma Alpha Award, Washington, DC, August 10.Google Scholar
Hyde, Henry J. 2003. Letter. Washington Post, Dec. 23.Google Scholar
McConnell, Grant. 1967. The Modern Presidency. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1968. “Public Law and Judicial Behavior.” Journal of Politics 30: 480–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of American Political Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Robert J., ed. 2000. Politics and Constitutionalism: The Louis Fisher Connection. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar