Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:36:57.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Personal is Political: Thinking Through the Clinton/Lewinsky/Starr Affair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2002

Juliet A. Williams
Affiliation:
Ph.D. in government from Cornell University in 1997. She holds a joint appointment as an assistant professor of law and society and women's studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Currently, she is working on a book about sexual harassment.

Extract

The Clinton/Lewinsky/Starr affair unearthed a fault line in contemporary feminist theory, an unresolved tension between two governing ideals: “the personal is political” and the right to privacy. Since the early 1970s, both of these slogans have figured prominently in feminist scholarship and feminist politics. But as the Clinton sex scandal dragged on, many began to question the merits of politicizing personal matters such as intimate relationships. In the scandal's wake, feminists may find it tempting to retire the rallying cry “the personal is political,” and to distance themselves from what now appears to be a quaint leftover of the bold but naïve feminism of the 1970s. In the end, Starr's McCarthyesqueIn one of the more memorable quips to emerge from the reams of commentary on the scandal, Alan Dershowitz coined the term “sexual McCarthyism” to describe Starr's tactics. probe seems to have enhanced the public commitment to privacy. No longer to be taken for granted, the right to privacy is widely affirmed as an essential shield against official coercion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)