Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Plumecocq, Gaël
2014.
The second generation of ecological economics: How far has the apple fallen from the tree?.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 107,
Issue. ,
p.
457.
Green, Donald P.
and
Thorley, Dane R.
2014.
Field Experimentation and the Study of Law and Policy.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
53.
Tucker, Todd
2014.
Grounded Theory Generation: A Tool for Transparent Concept Development.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Fariss, Christopher J.
and
Jones, Zachary M.
2014.
Enhancing Validity in Observational Settings When Replication is Not Possible.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Janz, Nicole
2015.
Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching.
International Studies Perspectives,
p.
n/a.
Dafoe, Allan
and
Lyall, Jason
2015.
From cell phones to conflict? Reflections on the emerging ICT–political conflict research agenda.
Journal of Peace Research,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 3,
p.
401.
Nielsen, Richard A.
2016.
Case Selection via Matching.
Sociological Methods & Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 3,
p.
569.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter
and
Janz, Nicole
2016.
Replication in International Relations.
International Studies Perspectives,
p.
ekv003.
Fabbrizzi, Sara
Maggino, Filomena
Marinelli, Nicola
Menghini, Silvio
Ricci, Cecilia
and
Sacchelli, Sandro
2016.
Sustainability and Food: A Text Analysis of the Scientific Literature.
Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia,
Vol. 8,
Issue. ,
p.
670.
Perron, Brian E.
Victor, Bryan G.
Hodge, David R.
Salas-Wright, Christopher P.
Vaughn, Michael G.
and
Taylor, Robert Joseph
2017.
Laying the Foundations for Scientometric Research.
Research on Social Work Practice,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 7,
p.
802.
Clemens, Michael A.
2017.
THE MEANING OF FAILED REPLICATIONS: A REVIEW AND PROPOSAL.
Journal of Economic Surveys,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
326.
Maziarz, Mariusz
2017.
The Reinhart-Rogoff controversy as an instance of the ‘emerging contrary result’ phenomenon.
Journal of Economic Methodology,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Marwick, Ben
2017.
Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation.
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
424.
Pellizzari, Edo
Lohr, Kathleen
Blatecky, Alan
and
Creel, Darryl
2017.
Reproducibility: A Primer on Semantics and Implications for Research.
Olazabal, Marta
Neumann, Marc B.
Foudi, Sébastien
and
Chiabai, Aline
2018.
Transparency and Reproducibility in Participatory Systems Modelling: the Case of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 6,
p.
791.
Elman, Colin
Kapiszewski, Diana
and
Lupia, Arthur
2018.
Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Kohler, Ulrich
Kreuter, Frauke
and
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
2019.
Nonprobability Sampling and Causal Analysis.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
149.
Seawright, Jason
2019.
Statistical analysis of democratization: a constructive critique.
Democratization,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
Avelino, George
Desposato, Scott
and
Mardegan, Ivan
2021.
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look.
Dados,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 3,
Korotchenko, Stan
2021.
The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice.
p.
321.