Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:16:50.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“What's Wrong with Being Sexy?” Why Political Science Needs to Get Serious about Sexuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Alesha E. Doan
Alesha E. Doan
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From the infamous blue dress to lewd gesturing under an airport bathroom stall, the scandalous coupling of sex and politics generates a lot of buzz. Political pundits inevitably find themselves on the media frontlines, ruminating on the impact of a particular impropriety, its implications for the dishonored politician's career, and his or her ability to effectively perform his or her job. Comedians gather some of their greatest material from the collision of sex and politics. Their jokes and send-ups, however, are not limited to sexual scandal. Tina Fey's impersonation of Sarah Palin catapulted Saturday Night Live (SNL) to the top of the Nielson ratings map in 2008. The nation collectively busted a gut watching the mock “nonpartisan” television announcement featuring Sarah Palin (dressed in a brightly colored skirt suit and punctuating her statements with emotive winks or cutesy giggles) and Hillary Clinton (sporting a drab pantsuit and underscoring her statements with firm nods or a clenched fist pounding the podium) as they denounced the role that sexism played in the presidential campaign.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 31 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asencio, Maysol. 2002. Sex and Sexuality among New York's Puerto Rican Youth. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity, Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, Alesha E., and Williams, Jean C.. 2008. The Politics of Virginity: Abstinence in Education. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Fields, Jessica. 2005. “‘Children Having Children’: Race, Innocence, and Sexuality Education.” Social Problems 52 (4): 549–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2001. “Group Stereotypes and Political Evaluation.” American Politics Research 29: 535–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2002. “Political Implications of Group Stereotypes: Campaign Experiences of Openly Gay Political Candidates.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 590–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of Conflict.” Journal of Politics 58: 332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotyping and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2009. “Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (31): 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher, and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 2000. “The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1965–82.” Journal of Politics 62 (1): 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 2005. Deserving and Entitled: Social Construction of Public Policy. Albany: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar