Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:53:43.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doing “Tuesday Lunch” at Lyndon Johnson's White House: New Archival Evidence on Vietnam Decisionmaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David M. Barrett
David M. Barrett*
Affiliation:
Villanova University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past decade, a number of political scientists have employed presidential papers and other archival materials in order to test various hypotheses regarding American politics. This has been particularly true concerning the Vietnam War and the American presidency (Kahin 1986; Burke and Greenstein 1989; Berman 1982, 1989; Kolko 1985; Hatcher 1990), as scholars have explored the interconnections between ideology, political style, presidential character, and other variables which may explain America's participation in that war. Thus, while some in the profession may have disdained the use of traditional historical research and methodology, there clearly has been a modest resurgence of archival research for the purposes of theory building.

While I am among those who see real possibilities for illuminating political processes by drawing on archival sources, their usefulness should not be overstated: even rich archival collections-may not “solve” debates over causation of political phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 676 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, David Marshall. 1989. “The Mythology Surrounding Lyndon Johnson, His Advisers, and the 1965 Decision to Escalate the Vietnam War.” Political Science Quarterly, 103, No. 4, 637–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Larry. 1982. Planning a Tragedy: The Americanization of the Vietnam War. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Berman, Larry. 1989. Lyndon Johnson's War: The Road to Stalemate in Vietnam. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Burke, John P. and Greenstein, Fred I., with the collaboration of Berman, Larry and Immerman, Richard. 1989. How Presidents Test Reality: Decisions on Vietnam, 1954 and 1965. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gallup, George. 1967, 1968. The Gallup Opinion Index.Google Scholar
Gelb, Leslie and Betts, Richard. 1979. The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Patrick L. 1990. The Suicide of an Elite: American Internationalists and Vietnam. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoopes, Townsend. 1969. The Limits of Intervention. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Humphrey, David. 1984. “Tuesday Lunch at the White House: A Preliminary Assessment.” Diplomatic History, 8, No. 4, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahin, George McT. 1986. Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kearns, Doris. 1976. Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel. 1985. Anatomy of a War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
The Pentagon Papers: The Gravel Edition. 1971. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar