Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T03:35:27.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toward a Stupidity-Ugliness Theory of Democratic Electoral Debacles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Lee Sigelman*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona

Extract

For the fifth time in its last six tries, the Democratic Party has managed to parlay its massive lead in party identifiers into another presidential election debacle. One shameless Democratic apologist, groping for a face-saving excuse, has hit upon the bizarre idea that the Democrats lose presidential elections time after time because, being rational political calculators, they find it in their partisan self-interest to do so (Erikson, 1988). This tortured theory overlooks the obvious: Democrats are too stupid to calculate their self-interest.

Although this conclusion may seem unduly harsh, science has proven that Democrats are significantly dumber than Republicans, even when the differing social bases of the two parties are held constant (Sigelman, 1988). This intellectual deficit helps explain why, time and time again, the Democrats find themselves hopelessly out-organized, out-strategized, and out-maneuvered—in short, out-thought—by the wilier Republicans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W. 1987. “Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972–1988.Journal of Politics 49:335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant. 1988. The Almanac of American Politics 1988. Washington, DC: National Journal Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “Why the Democrats Lose Presidential Elections: Toward a Theory of Optimal Loss.” Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine and Sprecher, Susan. 1986. Mirror. Mirror… The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Shawn, Bohan, Lisa, McCafferty, Patrick, and Harris, Kevin. 1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.American Journal of Political Science 30:108127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 1988. “Are Democrats Stupid?Journal of Irreproducible Results (March/April): 24.Google Scholar