Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:33:22.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inequality decomposition by factor component: a “rank-correlation” approach illustrated on the Taiwanese case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Martin Fournier
Martin Fournier*
Affiliation:
CERDI-IDREC (Université d’Auvergne) and CREST (Laboratoire de Microéconométrie)**
*
M.Fournier@u-clermont1.fr, Tél.:(33)04 73 17 75 00, Fax:(33)04 73 17 74 28
Get access

Summary

This paper systematises the method initiated by Burtless (1999) and provides a general framework for decomposing inequality by factor components. It has the double advantage over usual decomposition procedures to allow for a decomposition of changes in the whole income distribution and to distinguish between the effect of marginal distribution changes of income sources and that of changes in correlation between income sources. An illustration is provided for Taiwan, which emphasises the central role played by changes in assortative mating of spouses.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article systématise l’approche initiée par Burtless (1999) en une méthode générale de décomposition de l’inégalité par source qui présente le double avantage, par rapport aux décompositions usuelles, de permettre une décomposition de l’évolution de la distribution des revenus et de distinguer l’effet de la modification des distributions marginales des sources de celui de la modification de la structure de corrélation entre les sources. Une illustration menée sur Taiwan montre en particulier l’importance jouée par l’évolution de la corrélation entre les revenus des époux.

Keywords

Income distributionInequality decomposition by factor componentsTaiwanD3O15O53D3O15O53
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , 2001 , pp. 381 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank François Bourguignon, Denis Fougères, François Gardes, Sylviane Guillaumont-Jeanneney, Marc Gurgand and Sylvie Démurger, participants at seminars in CERDI and CREST, as well as an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

**

Address : CERDI-IDREC, 65, bd François Mitterrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand

References

Atkinson, A.B., (1997), “Bringing Income Distribution in from the Cold”, Economic Journal, 107, pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F. (1998), “Introduction : Income Distribution and Economics”, in Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F. (eds.) ; Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1, North Holland.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F. and Martinez, M. (1997), Decomposition of the changes in the distribution of primary family income : a microsimulation approach applied to France, 1979–1989, Document de travail Delta, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M. and Gurgand, M. (2001), “Fast development with a Stable Income Distribution : Taiwan, 1979–94”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47, No. 2, June, pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M. and Gurgand, M. (1999), Female Labour Supply in the Course of Taiwan’s Economic Development : 1979–94, Document de travail n° 9920, CREST-INSEE, Paris.Google Scholar
Burtless, G. (1999), “Effects of growing wage disparities and changing family composition on the U.S. income distribution”, European Economic Review, 43, pp. 853–65.Google Scholar
Chantreuil, F. and Trannoy, A. (1997), Inequality Decomposition Values, Mimeo, THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise.Google Scholar
Chantreuil, F. and Trannoy, A. (1999), Inequality Decomposition Values: the Trade-off between Marginality and Consistency, Document de travail n°9924, THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise.Google Scholar
Chu Y, P., (1997), Employment Expansion and Equitable Growth : Taiwan’s Postwar Experience, Mimeo, Academia Sinica.Taipei.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. and Paxson, C. (1993), Saving, growth and aging in Taiwan, NBER Working Paper No. 4330.Google Scholar
Di Nardo, J., Fortin, N. and Lemieux, T. (1996), “Labour market institutions and the distribution of wages 1973–1992 : A semiparametric approach”, Econometrica, 64, pp. 1001–1064.Google Scholar
Directorate general of budget, accounting and statistics (1996), Report on the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area of Republic of China, Executive Yuan, Republic of China.Google Scholar
Fei, J., Ranis, G. and Kuo, S. (1978), “Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor Component”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, pp. 17–54.Google Scholar
Fields, G.S. and Leary, J. (1997), Economic and demographic aspects of Taiwan’s rising family income inequality, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Fournier, M., (1999), Développement et distribution des revenus: Analyses par décomposition de l’expérience taiwanaise, PhD dissertation, EHESS, Paris.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, R. and Danziger, S. (1993), “Family structure, family size, and family income : accounting for changes in the economic well-being of children, 1968–1986”, in Danziger, S. and Gottschalk, R. (eds.), Uneven Tides : Rising Inequality in America, New York : Russel Sage foundation.Google Scholar
Hung, R, (1996), “The Great U-Turn in Taiwan : Economic Restructuring and a Surge in Inequality”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 26, pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
Juhn, C., Murphy, K. and Pierce, B. (1993), “Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill”, Journal of Political Economy, 101, pp. 410–442.Google Scholar
Kanbur, R. and Lustig, N. (1999), Why is Inequality Back on the Agenda?, Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, D.C., 28–30 April 1999.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S., (1955), “Economics growth and income inequality”, American Economic Review, 45, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Lerman, R.I., (1996), “The Impact of the Changing US Family Structure on Child Poverty and Income Inequality”, Economica, 63, pp. S119–S139.Google Scholar
Mc Nally, D. and Mc Nally, S. (1995), A socio-linguistic approach of Matchmakers and Marriages, Mimeo, Sun Yat Sen University, Guangzhou.Google Scholar
Pyatt, G., Chen, C.N. and Fei, J. (1980), “The Distribution of Income by Factor Components”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, pp. 451–473.Google Scholar
Schultz, T.P., (1997), Income Inequality in Taiwan 1976–1995 : Changing Family Composition, Aging and Female Labour-Force Participation, Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No.778, Yale University.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, A.F., (1982), “Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components”, Econometrica 50, pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, A.F., (1999), Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis : A unified framework based on the Shapeley value, mimeo, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Tsai, S.L., (1994), “Assortative Mating in Taiwan”, in Lau, S.K. Lee, M.K. Wan, P.S. and Wong, S.L. (eds.), Inequalities and Development, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar