Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T04:01:06.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of capacity-limited, generative models for human vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2023

Joseph Scott German  and
Robert A. Jacobs Open the ORCID record for Robert A. Jacobs [Opens in a new window]
Joseph Scott German
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA jgerman@ucsd.edu
Robert A. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA rjacobs@ur.rochester.edu https://www2.bcs.rochester.edu/sites/jacobslab/people.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although discriminative deep neural networks are currently dominant in cognitive modeling, we suggest that capacity-limited, generative models are a promising avenue for future work. Generative models tend to learn both local and global features of stimuli and, when properly constrained, can learn componential representations and response biases found in people's behaviors.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e391
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemi, A. A., Poole, B., Fischer, I., Dillon, J. V., Saurous, R. A., & Murphy, K. (2017). An information-theoretic analysis of deep latent variable models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00464. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00464v1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Alemi, A. A., Poole, B., Fischer, I., Dillon, J. V., Saurous, R. A., & Murphy, K. (2018). Fixing a broken ELBO. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00464v3. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00464v3.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ballé, J., Laparra, V., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2016). End-to-end optimized image compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01704. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.01704.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bates, C. J., & Jacobs, R. A. (2020). Efficient data compression in perception and perceptual memory. Psychological Review, 127, 891–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, C. J., & Jacobs, R. A. (2021). Optimal attentional allocation in the presence of capacity constraints in uncued and cued visual search. Journal of Vision, 21(5), 3, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, C. J., Lerch, R. A., Sims, C. R., & Jacobs, R. A. (2019). Adaptive allocation of human visual working memory capacity during statistical and categorical learning. Journal of Vision, 19(2), 11, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, C. P., Higgins, I., Pal, A., Matthey, L., Watters, N., Desjardins, G., … Lerchner, A. (2018). Understanding disentangling in β-VAE. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03599. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.03599.pdfGoogle Scholar
Erdogan, G., & Jacobs, R. A. (2017). Visual shape perception as Bayesian inference of 3D object-centered shape representations. Psychological Review, 124, 740–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
German, J. S., & Jacobs, R. A. (2020). Can machine learning account for human visual object shape similarity judgments? Vision Research, 167, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science (New York, N.Y.), 350(6266), 1332–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, C., & Williams, C. K. I. (2017). The shape variational autoencoder: A deep generative model of part-segmented 3D objects. Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 36(5), 1–11.Google Scholar
Sims, C. R., Jacobs, R. A., & Knill, D. C. (2012). An ideal observer analysis of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 119, 807–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed