Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T21:25:08.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Networks, intentionality and multiple realizability: Not enough to block reductionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Markus I. Eronen  and
Laura F. Bringmann
Markus I. Eronen
Affiliation:
Department of Theory and History of Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlandsm.i.eronen@rug.nlhttp://www.markuseronen.comhttps://www.rug.nl/staff/m.i.eronen/
Laura F. Bringmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands. l.f.bringmann@rug.nlhttps://www.rug.nl/staff/l.f.bringmann/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Borsboom et al. propose that the network approach blocks reductionism in psychopathology. We argue that the two main arguments, intentionality and multiple realizability of mental disorders, are not sufficient to establish that mental disorders are not brain disorders, and that the specific role of networks in these arguments is unclear.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e8
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickle, J. (2016) Multiple realizability. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/multiple-realizability/.Google Scholar
Bringmann, L. F. & Eronen, M. I. (2018) Don't blame the model: Reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychological Review 125(4):606–15. doi: 10.1037/rev0000108.Google Scholar
Bulteel, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Brose, A. & Ceulemans, E. (2016) Using raw VAR regression coefficients to build networks can be misleading. Multivariate Behavioral Research 51(2–3):330–44.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eronen, M. I. (2017) Interventionism for the intentional stance: True believers and their brains. Topoi. (Published Online, 2nd December, 2017). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9513-5.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1992) Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2010) Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(6):716–43.Google Scholar
Persons, J. B. (1986) The advantages of studying psychological phenomena rather than psychiatric diagnoses. American Psychologist 41(11):1252–60.Google Scholar
Polger, T. W. & Shapiro, L. A. (2016) The multiple realization book. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar