Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:59:30.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resource-rational analysis versus resource-rational humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Dobromir Rahnev Open the ORCID record for Dobromir Rahnev [Opens in a new window]
Dobromir Rahnev*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA30332. rahnev@psych.gatech.eduwww.rahnevlab.gatech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lieder and Griffiths advocate for resource-rational analysis as a methodological device employed by the experimenter. However, at times this methodological device appears to morph into the substantive claim that humans are actually resource-rational. Such morphing is problematic; the methodological approach used by the experimenter and claims about the nature of human behavior ought to be kept completely separate.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e19
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rahnev, D. & Denison, R. N. (2018a) Suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e223, 1–66. doi:10.1017/S0140525X18000936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahnev, D. & Denison, R. N. (2018b) Behavior is sensible but not globally optimal: Seeking common ground in the optimality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e251. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X18002121/type/journal_article [Accessed January 10, 2019].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. & Maloney, L. T. (2012) Ubiquitous log odds: A common representation of probability and frequency distortion in perception, action, and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6:1. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3261445&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed September 5, 2015].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed