Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:20:46.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women need to stay alive and protect reproductive choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Melissa M. McDonald Open the ORCID record for Melissa M. McDonald [Opens in a new window]  and
Rachel M. James
Melissa M. McDonald
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309-4482, USA mmmcdonald@oakland.edu rmjames@oakland.eduhttps://www.mcdonaldpeplab.com/
Rachel M. James
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309-4482, USA mmmcdonald@oakland.edu rmjames@oakland.eduhttps://www.mcdonaldpeplab.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Defense of reproductive choice is an important motivation in women's self-protection psychology for which the “staying alive theory” cannot fully account. Evidence indicates that some elements of women's self-protection psychology function to protect reproductive choice rather than survival, or may be equally well explained by either motivation. Integrating perspectives will result in greater explanatory breadth and precision in theory testing.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e143
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bröder, A., & Hohmann, N. (2003). Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00055-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. (1952). A comparative study of deviations from sexual mores. American Sociological Review, 17(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239(4843), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4843.985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavanne, T. J., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (1998). Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00016-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, D. (1997). Sex differences in violent victimization, 1994. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report. Retrieved from https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/SDVV.PDFGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. (1996). Women's fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T., Holbrook, C., & Fleischman, D. S. (2014). Assets at risk: Menstrual cycle variation in the envisioned formidability of a potential sexual assailant reveals a component of threat assessment. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1(3), 270–290. doi:10.1007/s40750-014-0006-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B. S., & Sloan, J. J. III. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the shadow of sexual assault hypothesis supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, C. A., & Franklin, T. W. (2009). Predicting fear of crime: Considering differences across gender. Feminist Criminology, 4(1), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2007). Women's perceptions of men's sexual coerciveness change across the menstrual cycle. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 536–540.Google Scholar
Lane, J., & Meeker, J. W. (2003). Women's and men's fear of gang crimes: Sexual and nonsexual assault as perceptually contemporaneous offenses. Justice Quarterly, 20, 337–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, D. C. (2001). The effect of fear of sexual victimization on adolescent fear of crime. Sociological Spectrum, 21, 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M., Coleman, B., & Brindley, S. (2019). Calibrating fear of rape: Threat likelihood and victimization costs. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. M., Asher, B. D., Kerr, N. L., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Fertility and intergroup bias in racial and minimal-group con- texts: Evidence for shared architecture. Psychological Science, 22, 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611410985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., Cesario, J., & Navarrete, C. D. (2015). Mate choice preferences in an intergroup context: Evidence for a sexual coercion threat-management system among women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. M., James, R. M., & Roberto, D. P. (2021). True crime consumption as defensive vigilance: Psychological mechanisms of a rape avoidance system. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2085–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minturn, L., Grosse, M., & Haider, S. (1969). Cultural patterning of sexual beliefs and behavior. Ethnology, 8(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3772759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, C. D., Fessler, D. M., Fleischman, D. S., & Geyer, J. (2009). Race bias tracks conception risk across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 20, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02352.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, C. (1989). Is rape a cultural universal? A re-examination of the ethnographic data. Ethnology, 28(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petralia, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2002). Effects of a sexual assault scenario on handgrip strength across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00085-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, C. M., & Rand, M. R. (2003). Criminal victimization, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/cv02.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rozée, P. D. (1993). Forbidden or forgiven? Rape in cross-cultural perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00658.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanday, P. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01068.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Aldine.Google Scholar
Vicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2010). Captured by true crime: Why are women drawn to tales of rape, murder, and serial killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 81–86. doi: 10.1177/1948550609355486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, M. (1984). Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid? Social Science Quarterly, 65, 681–702.Google Scholar
Warr, M. (1985). Fear of rape among urban women. Social Problems, 32, 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, G. F., Reynolds, A., & Egan, V. (2016). Myths and legends: The reality of rape offences reported to a UK police force. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar