Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T07:06:09.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Who's there?”: Depicting identity in interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Patrick G. T. Healey Open the ORCID record for Patrick G. T. Healey [Opens in a new window] ,
Christine Howes ,
Ruth Kempson ,
Gregory J. Mills ,
Matthew Purver ,
Eleni Gregoromichelaki ,
Arash Eshghi  and
Julian Hough
Patrick G. T. Healey
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK p.healey@qmul.ac.uk m.purver@qmul.ac.uk j.hough@qmul.ac.uk http://cogsci.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Christine Howes
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, 41255 Gothenburg, Sweden christine.howes@gu.se eleni.gregoromichelaki@gu.se
Ruth Kempson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK ruth.kempson@kcl.ac.uk https://gu-clasp.github.io/people/ruth-kempson/
Gregory J. Mills
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts, Computational Linguistics (CL), University of Groningen, 9712 EK Groningen, Netherlands School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Kingston University, Surrey KT1 1LQ, UK G.Mills@kingston.ac.uk
Matthew Purver
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK p.healey@qmul.ac.uk m.purver@qmul.ac.uk j.hough@qmul.ac.uk http://cogsci.eecs.qmul.ac.uk Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Eleni Gregoromichelaki
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, 41255 Gothenburg, Sweden christine.howes@gu.se eleni.gregoromichelaki@gu.se Department of Philosophy, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK ruth.kempson@kcl.ac.uk https://gu-clasp.github.io/people/ruth-kempson/
Arash Eshghi
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK A.Eshghi@hw.ac.uk
Julian Hough
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK p.healey@qmul.ac.uk m.purver@qmul.ac.uk j.hough@qmul.ac.uk http://cogsci.eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social robots have limited social competences. This leads us to view them as depictions of social agents rather than actual social agents. However, people also have limited social competences. We argue that all social interaction involves the depiction of social roles and that they originate in, and are defined by, their function in accounting for failures of social competence.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e37
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities, commonalities, and communication. In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eshghi, A., Howes, C., & Gregoromichelaki, E. (2022). Action coordination and learning in dialogue In Bernardy, J.-P., Blanck, R., Chatzikyriakidis, S., Lappin, S. & Maskharashvili, A. (Eds.), Probabilistic approaches to linguistic theory (pp. 357–418). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life London. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (1st ed.). Doubleday.Google Scholar
Healey, P., de Ruiter, J. P., & Mills, G. J. (2018). Editors introduction: Miscommunication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 264–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healey, P. G. T. (2021). Human-like communication. In Muggleton, S. & Chater, N. (Eds.), Human-like machine intelligence (pp. 137–151). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C., & Eshghi, A. (2021). Feedback relevance spaces: Interactional constraints on processing contexts in dynamic syntax. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 30(2), 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempson, R., Cann, R., Gregoromichelaki, E., & Chatzikyriakidis, S. (2016). Language as mechanisms for interaction. Theoretical Linguistics, 42(3–4), 203–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S., Healey, P. G. T., & Kaniadakis, A. (2021). Should Robots Blush? In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 717, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.344556CrossRefGoogle Scholar