Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T21:55:13.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Teacher Education: Past, Present, and Future

from Part VI - Context and Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Peter Swanson
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

The preparation of teachers has a rich history as a critical topic in political and social circles in the United States of America and is currently in policymakers’ crosshairs. With more than 200 years in development, teacher education in the US has changed dramatically, which can be documented by four historical periods: Colonial to 1789; 1789 to 1860; 1860 to 1910; and 1910 forward (LaBue, 1960). This chapter begins by presenting a historical perspective of the US teacher preparation system focusing on aspects such as who controlled teacher education and teacher credentialling as well as how the past seventy years have been impacted by four questions driving educational reform with an emphasis on the teaching of languages. After, the chapter highlights the teacher preparation system in Finland, extolled globally for outstanding student achievement. Subsequent to that, it turns to discuss the current landscape of the American teacher education system and juxtaposes it against its history over the past 200 plus years and the success of the Finnish system of preparing teachers.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 751 - 774
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahram, R., Stembridge, A., Fergus, E., & Noguera, P. (2011). Framing urban school challenges: The problems to examine when implementing response to intervention. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/diversity/urban-school-challenges.Google Scholar
Angus, D. L. (2001). A brief history of teacher education. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.Google Scholar
Ansary, T. (2007). Education at risk: Fallout from a flawed report. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/landmark-education-report-nation-risk.Google Scholar
Axelrod, J. (1966). The education of the modern foreign language teacher for American schools. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Banathy, B. H. (1968). The design of foreign language teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 52(8), 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkmaier, E., & Lange, D. (1967). Foreign language instruction. Review of Educational Research, 34(2), 186–199.Google Scholar
Boe, E. E., Bobbitt, S. A., Cook, L. H, Whitener, S. D., & Weber, A. L. (1997). Why didst thou go? Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 390–411.Google Scholar
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance, and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. (1966). The ideal preparation of foreign language teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 50(2), 71–78.Google Scholar
Carman, H. J. (1960). The historical development of licensing for the professions. Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2), 136–146.Google Scholar
Carroll, F. B., & Burke, M. L. (1965). Parameters of paired associate verbal learning: Length of list, meaningfulness, rate of presentation, and ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 543–553.Google Scholar
Carson, C. C., Huelskamp, R. M., & Woodall, T. D. (1993). Perspectives on education in America. Journal of Educational Research, 86(5), 259–310.Google Scholar
Clarken, R. (2012). Criticisms of teacher education programs. Retrieved from https://rodclarken.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/criticisms-of-teacher-education-programs/.Google Scholar
Clifford, R. T., Jorstad, H. L., & Lange, D. L. (1977). Student evaluation of peer-group microteaching as preparation for student teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 61(5), 229–236.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M. (2000). The questions that drive reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 331–333.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11), 1–53.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cook, K. M. (1921). State laws and regulations governing teachers’ certificates. US Bureau of Education, Bulletin No. 22. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). Standard 1: Content and Pedagogical Knowledge. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/standards/standard-1Google Scholar
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2017). Accreditation cycle. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/accreditation/caep-accreditation/accreditation-cycleGoogle Scholar
Day, R. R., & Conklin, G. (1992). The knowledge base in ESL/EFL teacher education. Paper presented at the 1992 TESOL Conference, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Draper, J., & Hicks, J. (2002). Foreign language enrollments in public secondary schools: Fall 2000. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/Enroll2000.pdf.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. D. (2004). The role of languages in a post-9/11 United States. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 268–271.Google Scholar
Eichelberger, E., Lee, J., & Vicens, A. J. (2014). How we won—and lost—the war on poverty, in 6 charts. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/01/charts-poverty-50-years-after-war-poverty.Google Scholar
Finnish National Board of Education (2015a). Education system. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education_system.Google Scholar
Finnish National Board of Education (2015b). Teacher education in Finland. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education_system/teacher_education.Google Scholar
Flattau, P. E., Bracken, J., Van Atta, R., Bendeh-Ahmadi, A., de la Cruz, R., & Sullivan, K. (2006). The National Defense Education Act of 1958: Selected Outcomes. Washington, DC: Institute for Defense Analyses Science & Technology Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Gage, N. L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
García, P., & Davis-Wiley, P. (2015). Tomorrow’s world language teachers: Practices, processes, caveats and challenges along the yellow brick road. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 2(5), 30–39.Google Scholar
Glisan, E. (2005). Leaving no foreign language teachers behind: A grassroots response. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 268–272.Google Scholar
Goe, L. (2002). Legislating equity. The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(42), 1–36.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D., Looney, D., & Lusin, N. (2015). Enrollments in languages other than English in the United States institutions of higher education, Fall 2013. The Modern Language Association. Retrieved from https://www.mla.org/Resources/Research/Surveys-Reports-and-Other-Documents/Teaching-Enrollments-and-Programs/Enrollments-in-Languages-Other-Than-English-in-United-States-Institutions-of-Higher-EducationGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, D. (2006). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, 4 April, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Gutek, G. L. (1991). An historical introduction to American education. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Hallman, C. L. (ed.) (1966). Proceedings of the conference on methods in foreign language education. Indiana University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED010932. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=+ED010932&id=ED010932.Google Scholar
Hancock, L. (2011). Why are Finland’s schools successful? Retrieved from http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/why-are-finlands-schools-successful-49859555/.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. S. (1965). New directions in foreign language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 49(5), 281–293.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, S. A., & Swanson, P. (2014). World language teacher candidate performance on edTPA: An exploratory study. Foreign Language Annals, 47(4), 576–591.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, S. A., & Swanson, P. (2016). Understanding the world language edTPA: Research-based policy and practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33.Google Scholar
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (eds.) (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Keislar, E. R., Stern, C., & Mace, L. (1965). Sequence of speaking and listening training in beginning French: A replication experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 3(3), 169–178.Google Scholar
Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Why a book on urban education? In Steinberg, S. & Kincheloe, J. (eds.), 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city (pp. 1–32). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Kincheloe, J. L. (2010). Why a book on urban education? In Steinberg, S. (ed.), 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city (2nd edn., pp. 1–28). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Klein, R. B. (1992). The American association of teachers of Spanish and Portuguese: The first 75 years. Hispania, 75(4), 1036–1079.Google Scholar
Knight, E. W., & Hall, C. L. (1951). Readings in American educational history. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.Google Scholar
Korhonen, Muusa (2018). Foreign languages in Finland’s educational system. Retrieved from https://www.thenewfederalist.eu/foreign-languages-in-finland-s-educational-system.Google Scholar
Korn, S. (2014). Why I said no to teach for America, and why you should too. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-korn/why-i-said-no-to-teach-for-america_b_4151764.html.Google Scholar
Labaree, D. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
LaBue, A. C. (1960). Teacher certification in the United States: A brief history. Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2), 147–172.Google Scholar
Leef, G. (2013). A key reason why American students do poorly. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2013/10/24/a-key-reason-why-american-students-do-poorly/#235217632349.Google Scholar
Levin, J. R. (1979). Assessing the classroom potential of the keyword method. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 583–594.Google Scholar
Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Retrieved from http://edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Exec_Summ.pdf.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. G. (1962). Foreign and second language teaching in the USSR. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Mann, H. (1839). Examination of schools. Common School Journal, 1, 8–54.Google Scholar
Mason, S. (2017). Foreign language teacher attrition and retention research: A meta-analysis. NECTFL Review, 80, 47–68.Google Scholar
McKim, L. (1969). The supervisor’s role in foreign-language teacher training. Presentation given at the annual convention of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, 23 November. New York.Google Scholar
Medina, J. (2009). Teacher training termed mediocre. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/education/23teachers.html.Google Scholar
Meier, J. H. (1968). Rationale for and application of micro-training to improve teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 19, 145–157.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, K. W., Johnston, M. C., & Fairbanks, G. H. (1960). Foreign language in Soviet schools. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, G. (1976). The classroom interaction of outstanding foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 9(2), 135–157.Google Scholar
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2015). About NCATE. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/about/vision-mission-goals.Google Scholar
National Standards Collaborative Board (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (4th edn.). Alexandria, VA: National Standards Collaborative Board.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010). PISA 2009 results. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). PISA 2012 Results. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). PISA 2015 Results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.Google Scholar
Otto, F. (1968). Alternative approaches to staffing the elementary foreign language program: Cost and time vs. achievement and satisfaction. The Modern Language Journal, 52(5), 293–301.Google Scholar
Paquette, F. A. (1964). Undergraduate MFL teacher-training in liberal arts colleges—A survey. The Modern Language Journal, 48(4), 424–431.Google Scholar
Peyton, J. K. (1997). Professional development of foreign language teachers. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. K. (1991). Upgrading the target language proficiency levels of foreign language teachers. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rainesford, A. (2016). The business of standardized testing. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rainesford-alexandra/the-business-of-standardi_b_9785988.html.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2003). A brief history of teacher professionalism. White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Ray, D. W. (1978). Cultural pluralism and the reorientation of educational policy in Canada. Comparative Education, 14(1), 19–32.Google Scholar
Rosenbusch, M. H. (2005). The No Child Left Behind Act and teaching and learning languages in US schools. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 250–261.Google Scholar
Rosenbusch, M. H., & Jensen, J. (2004). Status of foreign language programs in NECTFL states. NECTFL Review, 56, 26–37.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, P. (2010). The secret to Finland’s success: Educating teachers. Research brief. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar
Schorr, J. (2013). A revolution begins in teacher prep. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/a_revolution_begins_in_teacher_prep.Google Scholar
Shen, J. (2003). New teachers’ certification status and attrition pattern. A survival analysis using the Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study 1993–97. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. (1973). Video tape recording in instructor supervision and evaluation: Suggested guidelines. Foreign Language Annals, 6(4), 523–524.Google Scholar
Spell, J. R. (1927). Spanish teaching in the United States. Hispania, 10(3), 141–159.Google Scholar
Statistics Finland (2010). Language choices of comprehensive school pupils in 2010. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/ava/2010/02/ava_2010_02_2011–05-25_tie_001_en.html.Google Scholar
Strauss, V. (2017). Teacher shortages affecting every state as 2017–18 school year begins. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/08/28/teacher-shortages-affecting-every-state-as-2017-18-school-year-begins/?utm_term=.11d5814549a9.Google Scholar
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching. Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the US. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/coming-crisis-teaching.Google Scholar
Swanson, P. (2012). Second/foreign language teacher efficacy: Multiple factors and their relation to professional attrition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(1), 78–101.Google Scholar
Swanson, P., & Moore, A. D. (2006). Changing student misperceptions about foreign language teaching: A research-based approach to improving recruitment practices. NECTFL Review, 59, 6–27.Google Scholar
Terry, R. M. (2016). A history of ACTFL. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Treagust, D. F., Won, M., Petersen, J., & Wynne, G. (2015). Science teacher education in Australia: Initiatives and challenges to improve the quality of teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
US Department of Education (2004a). NCLB is not an “unfunded mandate” new GAO report confirms. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/news/newsletters/extracredit/2004/05/0526.html.Google Scholar
US Department of Education (2004b). New no child left behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html.Google Scholar
US Department of Education (2015). A matter of equity: Preschool in America. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/matter-equity-preschool-america.pdf.Google Scholar
Välijärvi, J., & Sahlberg, P. (2008). Should “failing” students repeat a grade? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 385–389.Google Scholar
Walsh, M. (2008). Federal appeals court weighs union’s suit over NCLB. Education Week. Available from, https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/12/11/16nclbsuit.h28.html.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×