Bassiouni, M. C., Introduction to International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Dubber, M. and Hörnle, T., Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., Enforcing International Law: A Way to World Peace (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1983).Google Scholar

Foster, N. G. and Sule, S., German Legal System and Laws (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Gur-Arye, M., Actio Libera in Causa in Criminal Law (Jerusalem: Harry Sacher Institute, 1984).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Collective Security under International Law (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1957, reprinted by Lawbook Exchange, 2001).Google Scholar

Kutz, C., Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

List, C. and Pettit, P., Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohlin, J. D. and Fletcher, G. P., Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples: With the Idea of Public Reason Revisited (Harvard University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law: Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slye, R. C. and Van Schaack, B., International Criminal Law: Essentials (New York: Aspen, 2009).Google Scholar

Solis, G. D., The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Zenker, R., Actio libera in causa: ein Paradoxon als öffentlicher Strafanspruch in einem vom Schuldprinzip geprägten Rechtsstaat (Münster: LIT Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar

Haque, A., ‘Laws for War’, in Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Modirzadeh, N. K., ‘Folk International Law: 9/11 Lawyering and the Transformation of the Law of Armed Conflict to Human Rights Policy and Human Rights Law to War Governance’, in Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Werle, G. and Burghardt, B., ‘Establishing Degrees of Responsibility: Modes of Participation in Article 25 of the ICC Statute’, in van Sliedregt, E. and Vasiliev, S. (eds.), Pluralism in International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014), 301–19.Google Scholar

Ambos, K. and Alkatout, J., ‘Has “Justice Been Done”? The Legality of Bin Laden’s Killing under International Law’, Israel Law Review, 45 (2012), 341–66.Google Scholar

Corn, G. S., Blank, L. R., Jenks, C. and Talbot Jensen, E., ‘Belligerent Targeting and the Invalidity of a Least Harmful Means Rule’, International Law Studies, 89 (2013), 536–626.Google Scholar

Creegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 59–82.Google Scholar

DeGirolami, M., ‘Culpability in Creating the Choice of Evils’, Alabama Law Review, 60 (2009), 597–648.Google Scholar

Dimock, S., ‘Actio Libera in Causa’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 549–69.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 819–53.Google Scholar

Hays Parks, W., ‘Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect’, NYU Journal of International Law & Politics, 42 (2010), 769–830.Google Scholar

Herrmann, J., ‘Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense: The Multifaceted Approach of German Law’, Brigham Young University Law Review (1986), 747–67.Google Scholar

Herstein, O. J., ‘A Normative Theory of the Clean Hands Defense’, Legal Theory, 17 (2011), 171–208.Google Scholar

Husak, D., ‘Intoxication and Culpability’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6 (2012), 363–79.Google Scholar

Jain, N., ‘The Control Theory of Perpetration in International Criminal Law’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 12 (2011), 157–98.Google Scholar

Katz, L., ‘Entrapment through the Lens of Actio Libera in Causa’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 587–95.Google Scholar

Kessler Ferzan, K., ‘Provocateurs’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7 (2013), 597–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantovani, F., ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law: The Viewpoint of a National Criminal Lawyer’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1 (2003), 26–38.Google Scholar

Melzer, N., ‘Keeping the Balance between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities’, NYU Journal of International Law & Politics, 42 (2010), 831–916.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. D., ‘Aggression, Legitimacy and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Connell, M. E., ‘Defining Armed Conflict’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13 (2009), 393–400.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189–207.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘The Duty to Capture’, Minnesota Law Review, 97 (2013), 1268–342.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘The Combatant’s Privilege in Asymmetric and Covert Conflicts’, Yale Journal of International Law, 40 (2015), 337–93.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., Van Sliedregt, E. and Weigend, T., ‘Assessing the Control-Theory’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 725–46.Google Scholar

Sassoli, M., ‘Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law’, International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 1 (2010), 5–51.Google Scholar

Tiffany, L. P. and Anderson, C. A., ‘Legislating the Necessity Defense in Criminal Law’, Denver Law Journal, 52 (1975), 839–79.Google Scholar

Weigend, T., ‘Perpetration through an Organization: The Unexpected Career of a German Legal Concept’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (2011), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werle, G. and Jeßberger, F., ‘“Unless Otherwise Provided”: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Elements of Crimes Under International Criminal Law’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3 (2005), 35–55.Google Scholar

Wirth, S., ‘Co-Perpetration in the Lubanga Trial Judgment’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 971–95.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Jugement rendu en application de l’article 74 du Statut, Concurring Opinion of Judge Christine van den Wyngaert, ICC-01/04-02/12, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir, Decision on Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09, 4 March 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir, Second Arrest Warrant, ICC-02/05-01/09, 12 July 2010.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, ICTY-IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, ICTY-IT-94-1-T, 7 May 1997.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment of the Trial Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. No. 107-40, § 2(a), 115 Stat. 224, 224 (2001).Google Scholar

Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 135.Google Scholar

ICRC, ‘How is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law?’, March 2008, available at: www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D., ‘Recapturing the Concept of Necessity’, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-90 (2013), 1–34, available at: www.ssrn.com/abstract=2230486.Google Scholar

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (adopted 8 June 1977, entered into force 7 December 1978), 1125 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1973 (2011) concerning Libya, 17 March 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/1973.Google Scholar

Testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Hearing on Protecting US Citizens’ Constitutional Rights during the War on Terrorism, 22 May 2013, available at: www.judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/113th/05222013/OConnell%2005222013.pdf.Google Scholar