Abdel-Massih, Ernest T. 1971. A Reference Grammar of Tamazight. Ann Arbor: Center for Near Eastern and North African Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Ackema, Peter, and Neeleman, Ad. 2005. Word-formation in Optimality Theory. In Štekauer, Pavol and Lieber, Rochelle (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation, 285–313. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2001. On some issues in morphological exponence. Yearbook of Morphology 2000: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2005a. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2005b. Morphological universals and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aranovich, Raúl, Inkelas, Sharon, Orgun, Orhan, and Sprouse, Ronald. 2005. Opacity in phonologically conditioned suppletion. Paper presented at the 13th Manchester Phonology Meeting.Google Scholar

Arnott, D. W. 1970. The nominal and verbal systems of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Arregi, Karlos, and Nevins, Andrew. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spell Out. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arregi, Karlos, Myler, Neil, and Vaux, Bert. 2013. Number marking in Western Armenian: A non-argument for outwardly-sensitive phonologically conditioned allomorphy. Paper presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Ashton, E. O. 1947. Swahili Grammar Including Intonation. London: Longmans. Second edition published in 1966.Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew. 2004. Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language 80: 807–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benua, Laura. 1995. Identity effects in morphological truncation. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 77–136. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Grohmann, Kleanthes and Struijke, Caro (eds.), Proceedings of the Maryland Mayfest on Morphology 1999, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53–85.Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia. 2004. Morph insertion and allomorphy in Optimality Theory. International Journal of English Studies 4: 74–104.Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia, and Harbour, Daniel. 2012. Contextual allomorphy. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. 195–235. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia, Lloret, Maria-Rosa, and Mascaró, Joan. 2007. Lexical specifications and ordering of allomorphs: Two case studies. Lingua 117: 903–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, Eugene. 1994. Theoretical Aspects of Kashaya Phonology and Morphology. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Bye, Patrick. 2008. Allomorphy: Selection, not optimization. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrick, and Krämer, Martin (eds.), Freedom of Analysis?, 63–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Caballero, Gabriela. 2010. Scope, phonology and morphology in an agglutinating language: Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) variable suffix ordering. Morphology 20: 165–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caballero, Gabriela, and Inkelas, Sharon. 2013. Word construction: Tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology 23: 103–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew. 1988. Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion. Yearbook of Morphology 1988: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew. 1990. Phonologically conditioned suppletion. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Luschützky, Han C., Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rennison, John R. (eds.), Contemporary Morphology, 17–23. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duden, 2006. Duden – Die Grammatik: Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch (Band 4), ed. Kunkel-Razum, Kathrin and Münzberg, Franziska. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar

Embick, David, and Halle, Morris. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Geerts, Twan, van Ginnekan, Ivo, and Jacobs, Haike (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003, 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golla, Victor. 1970. Hupa Grammar. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. Hua: A Papuan Language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Robert A. 1948. Descriptive Italian Grammar. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press and Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris, and Vaux, Bert. 1998. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In Jasonoff, Jay, Melchert, Harold Craig, and Olivier, Lisi (eds.), Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, 223–40. Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 2009. Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 267–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. Yearbook of Morphology 2002, 245–81.Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. 1990. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. 1998. The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: A case study of dominance effects. Yearbook of Morphology 1997, 121–55.Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. To appear. The morphology-phonology connection. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon, and Zoll, Cheryl. 2007. Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45.1: 133–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon, Orgun, Cemil Orhan, and Zoll, Cheryl. 1997. Implications of lexical exceptions for the nature of grammar. In Roca, Iggy (ed.), Constraints and Derivations in Phonology, 393–418. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 1999. The phonological lexicon. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 62–100. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1996. On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Kleinheiz, Ursula (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, 155–71. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In Durand, Jacques and Laks, Bernard (eds.), Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, 363–93. University of Salford.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 170–210. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, In-Seok (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982b. Word formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, Frances (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, 3–29. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapointe, Steven G. 2001. Stem selection and OT. Yearbook of Morphology 1999, 263–97.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

MacBride, Alexander Ian. 2004. A Constraint-Based Approach to Morphology. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Mascaró, Joan. 2007. External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Matthews, Peter H. 1991. Morphology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2000. Harmonic serialism and parallelism. In Hirotani, Masako, Coetzee, Andries, Hall, Nancy, and Kim, Ji-yung (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, 501–24. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2007. Hidden Generalizations: Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. and Prince, Alan. 1993. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 79–153.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 2001. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction [1993]. Manuscript. University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Rutgers University. Updated and enlarged 2001. Rutgers Optimality Archive 482.Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2007. Extended exponence by enrichment: Argument encoding in German, Archi, and Timucua. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13.1, 253–66.Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2011. Syncretism without underspecification: The role of leading forms. Word Structure 4.1, 53–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2013. Approaches to deponency. Language and Linguistics Compass 7, 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2357–82. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Noske, Manuela. 2000. [ATR] harmony in Turkana: A case of Faith Suffix >> Faith Root. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 771–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1993. Optimal Words: Towards a Declarative Theory of Word Formation. Manuscript. Princeton University.Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Lapointe, Steven G., Brentari, Diane K., and Farrell, Patrick M. (eds.), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 264–85. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-Based Morphology and Phonology: With Special Attention to Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Paster, Mary. 2005a. Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. Yearbook of Morphology 2005, 155–99.Google Scholar

Paster, Mary. 2005b. Subcategorization vs. output optimization in syllable-counting allomorphy. In Alderete, John, Han, Chung-hye, and Kochetov, Alexei (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 326–33. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Paster, Mary. 2006. Phonological Conditions on Affixation. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Paster, Mary. 2009. Explaining phonological conditions on affixation: Evidence from suppletive allomorphy and affix ordering. Word Structure 2.1, 18–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17.2, 237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pater, Joe. 2007. The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Bateman, Leah, O’Keefe, Michael, Reilly, Ehren, and Werle, Adam (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32, 259–96. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar

Payne, David. 1981. The Phonology and Morphology of Axininca Campa. Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar [1993]. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ringen, Catherine O., and Vago, Robert M.. 1998. Hungarian vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. Phonology 15, 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Sharon. 2000. Multiple correspondence in reduplication. In Juge, Matt and Moxley, Jeri (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 315–26. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Russell, Kevin. 1995. Morphemes and Candidates in Optimality Theory. Manuscript. University of Manitoba. Rutgers Optimality Archive 44-0195.Google Scholar

Ryan, Kevin M. 2010. Variable affix order: Grammar and learning. Language 86, 758–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sezer, Engin. 1981. The k/Ø alternation in Turkish. In Clements, G. N. (ed.), Harvard Studies in Phonology, 354–82. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer L. 1997. Noun Faithfulness: On the Privileged Behavior of Nouns in Phonology. Manuscript. Rutgers Optimality Archive 242-1098.Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2014. A Note on Blocking and Extended Exponence in Realization Optimality Theory. Manuscript. University of Essex.Google Scholar

Stump, Gregory T. 1993. Position classes and morphological theory. Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 129–80.Google Scholar

Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 1999. Morphology consuming syntax resources: Generation and parsing in a minimalist version of distributed morphology. In Retoré, Christian and Stabler, Edward (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars, pp. 37–55. Utrecht.Google Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 2001. Distributed Optimality. Doctoral dissertation. University of Potsdam.Google Scholar

Werner, Roland. 1993. Tidn-Aal: A Study of Midob. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Wolf, Matthew. 2008. Optimal Interleaving: Serial Phonology-Morphology Interaction in a Constraint-Based Model. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar

Wolf, Matthew, and McCarthy, John J.. 2010. Less than zero: Correspondence and the null output. In Blaho, Sylvia and Rice, Curt (eds.), Modeling Ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory, 17–66. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Xu, Zheng. 2007. Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar

Xu, Zheng. 2011. Optimality Theory and morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 5.7, 466–84.Google Scholar

Xu, Zheng, and Aronoff, Mark. 2011a. A Realization Optimality Theory approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence. Journal of Linguistics 47.3, 673–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, Zheng, and Aronoff, Mark. 2011b. A Realization Optimality Theory approach to full and partial identity of forms. In Maiden, Martin, Smith, John Charles, Goldbach, Maria, and Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier (eds.), Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, 257–86. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1998. Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In Lapointe, Steven G., Brentari, Diane K., and Farrell, Patrick M. (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 216–46. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Yu, Alan C. L. 2003. The Morphology and Phonology of Infixation. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Yu, Alan C. L. 2007. A Natural History of Infixation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. How to describe inflection. In Niepokuj, M., van Clay, M., Nikiforidou, V., and Feder, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372–86. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar