Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:08:10.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - The Role of Morphology in Transformational Grammar

from Part V - The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

Andrew Hippisley
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Gregory Stump
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. Comments on Wasow: The role of the Theme in lexical rules. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 361–77. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A–Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1953. Systems of syntactic analysis. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 18, 242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, Stephen R. and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1979 [1951]. The Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew [1951]. New York: Garland Publishing. Revision of 1951 University of Pennsylvania MA thesis.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1985 [1955–6]. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. University of Chicago Press. Edited version of 1955–6 manuscript, with 1979 index; earlier edition published by Plenum Press, New York, copyright 1975.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A Minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The View from Building 20, 152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald; Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Sag, Ivan A.. 1982. Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Language 58, 591638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The View from Building 20, 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen. 1993. The Linguistics Wars. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A. (ed.) 1962. Proceedings of the Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23, 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J., and Goldsmith, John A.. 1995. Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1977. X¯ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin (ed.) 1957. Readings in Linguistics: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America Since 1925. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Lizanne. 1998. The Morphosyntax of Clausal Nominalization Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Postal, Paul M.. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In Campos, Hector and Kempchinsky, Paula (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, 251–75. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle, and Scalise, Sergio. 2006. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 5.1, 732.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1965. The inflectional component of a word-and-paradigm grammar. Journal of Linguistics 1, 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1986. Linguistic Theory in America, 2nd edn. Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1949. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1947. Grammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word 3, 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1952. More on grammatical prerequisites. Word 8, 106–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Wilson, Deirdre. 1977. Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53, 741–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 327–60. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1992. Some choices in the theory of morphology. In Levine, Robert (ed.), Formal Grammar: Theory and Implementation, 327–71. Vancouver: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×