Book contents
- Understanding Economic Change
- Understanding Economic Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual and Methodological Problems
- Part III Perspectives on Evolutionary Macroeconomics
- Part IV Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution
- Part V Evolutionary Perspectives on Welfare and Sustainability
- 11 As Innovations Drive Economic Change, Do They Also Improve Our Welfare?
- 12 Sustainable Consumption Patterns and the Malleability of Consumer Preferences
- Index
- References
11 - As Innovations Drive Economic Change, Do They Also Improve Our Welfare?
from Part V - Evolutionary Perspectives on Welfare and Sustainability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2018
Book contents
- Understanding Economic Change
- Understanding Economic Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual and Methodological Problems
- Part III Perspectives on Evolutionary Macroeconomics
- Part IV Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution
- Part V Evolutionary Perspectives on Welfare and Sustainability
- 11 As Innovations Drive Economic Change, Do They Also Improve Our Welfare?
- 12 Sustainable Consumption Patterns and the Malleability of Consumer Preferences
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding Economic ChangeAdvances in Evolutionary Economics, pp. 343 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. 2009. Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 51–104.Google Scholar
Binswanger, M. 2006. Why Does Income Growth Fail to Make Us Happier? Searching for the Treadmills behind the Paradox of Happiness. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 366–381.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 2008. Can There Be a Preference-based Utilitarianism. In: Fleurbaey, M., Salles, M., and Weymark, J. (eds.) Justice, Political Liberalism and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cabanac, M. 1992. Pleasure: The Common Currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
DellaVigna, S. 2009. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 315–372.Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Lucas, R. E. 1999. Personality and Subjective Well-Being. In: Diener, E. (ed.) The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., and Smith, H. L. 1999. Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120–1171.Google Scholar
Fernández-Dols, J.-M. and Ruiz-Belda, M.-A. 1995. Are Smiles a Sign of Happiness? Gold Medal Winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1113–1119.Google Scholar
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., and Laranja, M. 2011. Reconceptualising the “Policy Mix” for Innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702–713.Google Scholar
Frederick, S. and Loewenstein, G. F. 1999. Hedonic Adaptation. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. 2002. Happiness and Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J. 2005. Toward a New Welfare Economics for Sustainability. Ecological Economics, 53, 211–222.Google Scholar
Graham, C. 2010. Happiness around the World: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, R. and Autio, E. 2011. A Failure Trichotomy in Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation. Research Policy, 40, 819–831.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. and Mcpherson, M. S. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Headey, B. 2010. The Set Point Theory of Well-being Has Serious Flaws: On the Eve of a Scientific Revolution? Social Indicators Research, 97, 7–21.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., and Sachs, J. 2015. World Happiness Report. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal, 49, 696–712.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., and Sarin, R. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1939. Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. The Economic Journal, 49, 549–552.Google Scholar
Kőszegi, B. and Rabin, M. 2008. Choices, Situations, and Happiness. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1821–1832.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. B. and Schkade, D. A. 2008. The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833–1845.Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. 2005. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach – Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. and Tellegen, A. 1996. Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McQuillin, B. and Sugden, R. 2012. Reconciling Normative and Behavioural Economics: The Problems to Be Solved. Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 553–567.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. 1998. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1996. The Sources of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1999. Hayek’s Contribution to Understanding the Process of Economic Change. In: Vanberg, V. J. (ed.) Freiheit, Wettbewerb und Wirtschaftsordnung. Freiburg: Haufe.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2003. Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics, 9, 33–59.Google Scholar
Redelmeier, D. A. and Kahneman, D. 1996. Patients’ Memories of Painful Medical Treatments: Real-time and Retrospective Evaluations of Two Minimally Invasive Procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. and Birdzell, L. E. 1986. How the West Grew Rich – The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., and Seidlitz, L. 1993. Subjective Well-Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self-report and Non-Self-report Measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342.Google Scholar
Schubert, C. 2015. What Do We Mean When We Say That Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Policy) Increase “Welfare”? Journal of Economic Issues, 49, 1–22.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. 2000. Self-determination: The Tyranny of Freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79–88.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1985b. Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
Shiv, B. and Huber, J. 2000. The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 202–216.Google Scholar
Shizgal, P. 1999. On the Neural Computation of Utility: Implications from Studies of Brain Stimulation Reward. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 1993. Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2004. The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences. The American Economic Review, 94, 1014–1033.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2006. What We Desire, What We Have Reason to Desire, Whatever We Might Desire: Mill and Sen on the Value of Opportunity. Utilitas, 18, 33–51.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2013. The Behavioural Economist and the Social Planner: To Whom Should Behavioural Welfare Economics Be Addressed? Inquiry, 56, 519–538.Google Scholar
Tenner, E. 1997. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. 2014. Evolving Preferences and Welfare Economics: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 234, 328–349.Google Scholar
von Weizsäcker, C. C. 2005. The Welfare Economics of Adaptive Preferences. In: Institute, M. P. (ed.) Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. Bonn: Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1996. Innovations, Externalities and the Problem of Economic Progress. Public Choice, 89, 113–130.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2009. Novelty and the Bounds of Unknowledge in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 16, 361–375.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2017. The Evolution of Consumption and Its Welfare Effects. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27, 273–293.Google Scholar
Witt, U. and Schubert, C. 2008. Constitutional Interests in the Face of Innovations: How Much Do We Need to Know about Risk Preferences? Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 203–225.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by