Sagaut, P. 2006, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, 3rd ed., Springer.Google Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J. 2010, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wachtor, A.J., Grinstein, F.F., DeVore, C.R., Ristorcelli, J.R., and Margolin, L.G. 2013, “Implicit large-eddy simulation of passive scalar mixing in statistically stationary isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 25(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Overholt, M.R. and Pope, S.B. 1996, “Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 8(11), 3128–3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pullin, D.I. 2000, “A vortex-based model for the subgrid flux of a passive scalar,” Phys. Fluids, 12(9), 2311–2319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowling, D.R. and Dimotakis, P.E. 1990, “Similarity of concentration field of gas-phase turbulent jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ristorcelli, J.R. 2006, “Passive scalar mixing: Analytic study of time scale ratio, variance, and mix rate,” Phys. Fluids, 18(7), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotoh, T., Watanabe, T., and Suzuki, Y. 2011, “Universality and anisotropy in passive scalar fluctuations in turbulence with uniform mean gradient,” J. Turb., 12(48), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinstein, F.F. 2010, “Vortex dynamics and transition to turbulence in free shear flows,” ch. 8 in Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. 1999, “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows,” AIAA Journal, 37(5), 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, D.H., Woodward, P.R., and Pouquet, A. 1998, “Inertial range structures in decaying turbulent flows,” Phys. of Fluids 10, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. 2002, “Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds-number free and wall bounded flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 181, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A., Xiao, Z., and Smolarkiewicz, P. 2003, “Effective eddy viscosities in implicit large eddy simulations of turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 15, 3890–3893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F. 2006, “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES,” Journal of Turbulence, 7, N15, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornber, B., Mosedale, A., and Drikakis, D. 2007, “On the implicit large eddy simulations of homogeneous decaying turbulence,” Journal of Computational Physics, 226, 1902–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnier, E., Mossi, M., Sagaut, P., Comte, P., and Deville, M. 1999, “On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large eddy simulation,” J. Comput. Phys. 153, 273–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rider, W.J. and Margolin, L.G. 2010, “Numerical regularization: The numerical analysis of implicit subgrid models,” ch. 5 in Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, ed. by Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J., 2nd printing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Petersen, M.R. and Livescu, D. 2010, “Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 22(11), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jimenez, J., Wray, A.A., Saffman, P.G., and Rogallo, R.S. 1993, “The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65–90 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Y. and Meneveau, C. 2005, “Origin of non-Gaussian statistics in hydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Letters, 95, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Li, Y., Perlman, E., Wan, M., Yang, Y., Burns, R., Meneveau, C., Burns, R., Chen, S., Szalay, A., and Eyink, G. 2008, “A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence,” J. Turbulence 9, N31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimotakis, P.E. 2000, “The mixing transition in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 409, 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiménez, J. 1992, “Kinematic alignment effects in turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids A, 4, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wachtor, A.J. 2012, “On the predictability of turbulent mixing with implicit large-eddy simulation,” PhD Thesis Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar

Blaisdell, G.A., Mansour, N.N., and Reynolds, W.C. 1994, “Compressibility effects on the passive scalar flux within homogeneous turbulence,” Phys. Fluids 6, 3498–3500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirt, C.W. 1969, “Computer studies of time-dependent turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids 12, II–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelkin, M., “Universality and scaling in fully developed turbulence,” Adv. in Phys., 43, 143–181, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., and Speziale, C.G., “Advances in the fundamental aspects of turbulence, energy transfer, interacting scales, and self-preservation in isotropic decay,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 51, 267, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moin, P., and Kim, J., “Tracking turbulence with supercomputers,” Scientific American, 276, 62–68, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Matthaeus, W.H., and Dmitruk, P., “Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and time scales in astrophysical and space plasma,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 76, 1015–1035, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batchelor, G.K., Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953.Google Scholar

Saddoughi, S.G. and Veeravalli, S.V., “Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech., 268, 333, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiménez, J., “Computing high-Reynolds-number turbulence: Will simulation ever replace experiments?,” J. Turbulence, 4(022), 1–14, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S.B., “Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” New J. Phys., 6(35), 1–24, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burattini, P., Lavole, P., and Antonia, R.A., “On the normalized energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 17(098103), 1–4, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sreenivasan, K.R., “On the scaling of the turbulence energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 27, 1048–1051, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sreenivasan, K.R., “An update on the energy dissipation rate in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 10, 528–529, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keneda, Y., Ishihara, T., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K., and Uno, A., “Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box,” Phys. Fluids, 15, L21–24, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, B.R., Krogstad, P.-A., and van de Water, W., “Measurements of the turbulent energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 14, 1288–1290, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Hossain, M., and Vahala, G., “A critical look at the use of filters in large eddy simulation,” Phys. Lett. A, 139, 330–332, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, A., “Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows,” Adv. Geophy. S., 18A, 237–248, 1974.Google Scholar

Germano, M., “Differential filters for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 29, 1755–1757, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langford, J.A. and Moser, R.D., “Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 398, 321–346, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A. and Loh, K.-C., “The subgrid-scale estimation model in the physical space representation,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2330–2342, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A. and Adams, N.A., “Direct modelling of subgrid scales of turbulence in large eddy simulations,” J. of Turbulence, 3(024), 1–19, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., “Eddy damping, backscatter, and subgrid stresses in subgrid modeling of turbulence, “Phys. Rev. A, 43, 7049–7052, 1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhou, Y. and Vahala, G., “Reformulation of recursive-renormalization-group based subgrid modeling of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E, 47, 2503–2519, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kraichnan, R.H., “Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions,” J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1521–1536, 1976.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubois, T., Jauberteau, F., and Zhou, Y., “Influences of subgrid scale dynamics on resolvable scale statistics in large-eddy simulations,” Physica D, 100, 390–406, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, H.A., “Eddy diffusivity, eddy noise, and subgrid-scale modelling,” J. Fluid Mech., 81, 719–734, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization-group theory for the eddy viscosity in subgrid modeling,” Phys. Rev. A, 37, 2590–2598, 1988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization eddy viscosity and Kolmogorov’s constant in forced Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. A., 40, 5865–5874, 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dimotakis, P.E., “The mixing transition in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 409, 69–98, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., “Unification and extension of the concepts of similarity criteria and mixing transition for studying astrophysics using high energy density laboratory experiments or numerical simulations,” Phys. Plasmas, 14, 082701, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Robey, H.F., and Buckingham, A.C., “Onset of turbulence in accelerated high-Reynolds-number flow,” Phys. Rev. E, 67, 056305, 1–11, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhou, Y., Remington, B.A., Robey, H.F., et al., “Progress in understanding turbulent mixing induced by Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instability,” Phys. Plasma, 10, 1883–1896, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinze, J.O., Turbulence, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.Google Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A. and Rogallo, R.S., “Local energy transfer and non-local interactions in homogeneous, isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 2, 413–426, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., “Degree of locality of energy transfer in the inertial range,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 1092–1094, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., “Interacting scales and energy transfer in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 2511–2524, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., “Renormalization group theory for fluid and plasma turbulence,” Phys. Report, 488, 1, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraichnan, R.H., “Inertial range transfer in two- and three-dimensional turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 47, 525–535, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesieur, M., Turbulence in Fluids, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotoh, T. and Watanabe, T., “Statistics of transfer fluxes of the kinetic energy and scalar variance,” J. of Turbulence, 6(33), 1–18, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaneda, Y., “Renormalization expansions in the theory of turbulence with the use of the Lagrangian position function,” J. Fluid Mech, 107, 131, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y. and Oughton, S., “Nonlocality and the critical Reynolds numbers of the minimum state magnetohydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Plasma, 18, 072304, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Buckingham, A.C., Bataille, F., and Mathelin, L., “Manimum state for high Reynolds and Peclet number turbulent flows,” Phys. Lett. A., 373, 2746, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., and Brachet, M. E., “An analysis of subgrid-scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A 5, 1747, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., Hartel, C., and Kleiser, L., “Energy transfer in numerically simulated wall-bounded turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1583, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinez, D.O., Chen, S., Dolen, G.D., Kraichnan, R.H., Wang, L.P., and Zhou, Y., “Energy spectrum in the dissipation range of fluid turbulence,” J. Plasma Phys., 57, 195, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayleigh, Lord, Scientific Papers, Dover, New York, 1965.Google Scholar

Taylor, G. I., “The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their plane,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 201, 192, 1950.Google Scholar

Richtmyer, R. D., “Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 13, 297, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meshkov, E. E., “Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave,” Izv., Acad. Sci., USSR Fluid Dyn., 4, 101, 1969.Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, S., Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability, Dover, New York, 1961.Google Scholar

Stokes, G.G., “On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums,” Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 9, 8, 1901.Google Scholar

Lamb, H., Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, London, 1932.Google Scholar

Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L., First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurricane, O.A., Hansen, J.F., Robey, H.F., et al., “A high energy density shock driven Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 16(5), p056305, 2008.Google Scholar

Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Analysis of the effects of energy deposition on shock-driven turbulent mixing,” Phys. Plasma, 20(7), 072306, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welser-Sherrill, L., Fincke, J., Doss, F., et al., “Two laser-driven mix experiments to study reshock and shear,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(3), 496, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Simulation ensemble for a laser-driven shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(9), 092301, 2013.Google Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Gowandhan, A.A., et al., “On coarse-grained simulations of turbulent material mixing,” Physica Scripta, 86(5), 058203, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., and Hurricane, O.A., “Experimental observations of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability on the OMEGA Laser Facility,” Phys. Plasma, 19(9), 092702, 2012.Google Scholar

Gowandhan, A.A. and Grinstein, F.F., “Numerical simulation of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in shocked gas curtains,” J. Turbulence, 12, pN43, 2012.Google Scholar

Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Raman, K., et al., “Validation of a turbulent Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer model using a high-energy-density OMEGA laser experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(15), 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Stefano, C.A., Kuranz, C.C., Keiter, P.A., et al., “Late-time breakup of laser-driven hydrodynamics experiments,” High Energy Density Phys., 8(4), 360, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., et al., “Measurements of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in high-energy-density plasmas,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(1), 47, 2013.Google Scholar

Doss, F.W., Loomis, E.N., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Instability, mixing, and transition to turbulence in a laser-driven counterflowing shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(1), 012707, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, R.P., Harding, E.C., and Kuranz, C.C., “Approaches to turbulence in high-energy-density experiments,” Physica Scripta, 2008, p014022, 2008.Google Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.G., editors, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F.F., Wachtor, A.J., and Haines, B.M., “Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large eddy simulation,” Phys. Rev. E., 89, 013303, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falkovich, G., “Bottleneck phenomenon in developed turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1411, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeung, P.K. and Zhou, Y., “Universality of the Kolmogorov constant in numerical simulations of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E., 56, 1746, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

She, Z.S., Chen, S., Doolen, G., Kraichnan, R.H., and Orszag, S.A., “Reynolds number dependence of isotropic Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3251, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cao, N., Chen, S., and Doolen, G.D., “Statistics and structures of pressure in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2235, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, L.P., Chen, S., Brasseur, J.G., and Wyngaard, J.C., “Examination of hypotheses in the Kolmogorov refined turbulence theory through high- resolution simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 309, 113, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Gowardhan, A.A., and Wachtor, A.J., 2011, “Simulations of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in planar shock-tube experiments,” Physics of Fluids, 23, 034106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows,” AIAA Journal, 37, 544–556, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, D.H., Woodward, P.R., and Pouquet, A., “Inertial range structures in decaying turbulent flows,” Phys. of Fluids, 10, 237–245, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds number free and wall bounded flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 181, 68, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alsmeyer, H., 1976, “Density profiles in argon and nitrogen shock waves measured by the absorption of an electron beam,” J. Fluid Mech. 74, 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aluie, H., 2013, “Scale decomposition in compressible turbulence,” Physica D 247, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspden, A., Nikiforakis, N., Dalziel, S., and Bell, J. B., 2008, “Analysis of implicit LES methods,” Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci. 3, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bethe, H., 1942 [1998], “On the theory of shock waves for an arbitrary equation of state,” Technical Report NDRC-B-237, office of Scientfic Research and Development. Reprinted in Classic Papers in Shock Compression Science, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Boris, J.P., 1990, “On large eddy simulation using subgrid turbulence models,” in Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, ed. by Lumley, J.L., Springer-Verlag, 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boris, J.P., 2013, “Flux-corrected transport looks at forty,” Computers & Fluids 84, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boris, J.P., Book, D.L., 1973: “Flux-corrected transport: 1. SHASTA, A fluid transport algorithm that works,” J. Comp. Phys. 11, 38–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, H., 2005, “Kinematics of volume transport,” Physica A 349, 11–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cercignani, C., 2000, Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar

Chapman, S. and Cowling, T.G., 1991, The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, R.A., Ferziger, J.H., Reynolds, W.C., 1979, “Evaluation of subgrid scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 91, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colella, P. and Woodward, P.R., 1984, “The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations,” J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrsin, S., 1974, “Limitations of gradient transport models in random walks and turbulence,” Adv. Geophys. 18 A, 25–60.Google Scholar

Deardorff, J.W., 1972, “Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux,” J. Geophysical Res. 77, 5900–5904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyink, G.L., 1994, “Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics,” Physica D 78, 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyink, G.L., 2003, “Local 4/5-law and energy dissipation anomaly in turbulence,” Nonlinearity 16, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favre, A., 1983, “Turbulence: Spacetime statistical properties and behavior in supersonic flows,” Phys. Fluids 26, 2851–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foias, C., Sell, G.R., Temam, R., 1988, “Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations,” J. Differential Eqs. 73, 309–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foias, C., Holm, D.D., Titi, E.S., 2001, “The Navier–Stokes–alpha model of fluid turbulence,” Physica D 152, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederiksen, J.S and Davies, A.G., 1997, “Eddy viscosity and stocastic backscatter parameterizations on the sphere for atmospheric circulation models,” J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2475–2492.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, U., 1998, Turbulence, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ghosal, S., 1996, “An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence,” J. Comput. Phys. 125, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleick, J., 2008, Chaos: Making a New Science, Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Godunov, S.K. and Sergei, K., 1954, “Different Methods for Shock Waves,” PhD Dissertation, Moscow State University.Google Scholar

Grad, H., 1958, “Principles of the kinetic theory of gases,” in Handbuch der Physik Vol. XII, ed. by Flugge, S., Springer, 205–294.Google Scholar

Greenshields, C.J. and Reese, J.M., 2007, “The structure of shock waves as a test of Brenner’s modifications to the Navier-Stokes equations," J. Fluid Mech. 580, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.J., 2007, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S., 1971, An Introduction to the Theory of the Boltzmann Equation, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,.Google Scholar

Hirt, C.W., 1968, “Heuristic stability theory for finite difference equations,” J. Comput. Phys. 2, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirt, C.W., 1969, “Computer studies of time-dependent turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids Supplement II, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, C-M. and Tai, Y-C., 1998, “Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMs) and fluid flows,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holm, D.D., Marsden, J.E., and Ratiu, T.S., 1998, “Euler–Poincaré models of ideal fluids with nonlinear dispersion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4173–4176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itô, K., 1957, Essentials of Stochastic Processes, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Jones, D.A., Margolin, L.G., and Poje, A.C., 2002, “Accuracy and nonoscillatory properties of enslaved difference schemes,” J. Comput. Phys. 181, 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, P.M. and Kieffer, R.S., 2015, “A note on finite-scale Navier–Stokes theory: the case of constant viscosity, strictly adiabatic flow,” Phys. Letters A 379, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kremer, G.M., 2010, An Introduction to the Boltzmann Equation and Transport Processes in Gases, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., 1959, Fluid Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 6, Addison-Wesley, chapter 17.Google Scholar

Lax, P.D., 1952, “On discontinuous initial value problems for nonlinear equations and finite differences,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LAMS-1332.Google Scholar

Leith, C.E., 1990, “Stochastic backscatter in a subgridscale model,” Phys. Fluids A 2, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeVeque, R.J., 2002, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linden, P.F., Redondo, J.M., and Youngs, D.L., 1994, “Molecular mixing in Rayleigh-Taylor instability,” J. Fluid Mech. 265, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majda, A. and Osher, S., 1977, “Propagation of error into regions of smoothness for accurate difference approximations to hyperbolic equations,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 30, 671–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., 2009, “Finite-scale equations for compressible fluid flow,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 367, 2861–2871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Margolin, L.G., 2014, “Finite scale theory: The role of the observer in classical fluid flow,” Mech. Res. Comm. 57, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G. and Rider, W.J., 2002, “A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 39, 821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F., 2006, “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES,” J. Turbulence 7, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Ruppel, H.M., and Demuth, R. B., 1985, “Gradient Scaling for Nonuniform Meshes,” Proc. 4th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow, The University of Wales, Swansea, 1477.Google Scholar

Margolin, L.G. and Shashkov, M., 2005, “MPDATA: Gauge transformation, limiters and monotonicity,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 50, 1193–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G. and Shashkov, M., 2007, “Finite volume methods and the equations of finite scale: a mimetic approach,” Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 56, 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Smolarkiewicz, P.K., and Sorbjan, Z., 1999, “Large eddy simulations of convective boundary layers using nonoscillatory differencing,” Physica D 133, 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Smolarkiewicz, P.K., and Wyszogradzki, A.A., 2006, “Dissipation in implicit turbulence models: A computational study,” J. Appl. Mech. 73, 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G. and Vaughan, D.E., 2012, “Traveling wave solutions for finite scale equations,” Mech. Res. Comm. 45, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattiussi, C., 1997, “An analysis of finite volume, finite element and finite differences methods using some concepts from algebraid topology,” 133, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merriam, M.L., 1987, “Smoothing and the Second Law,” Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 64, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nie, X.B., Chen, S.Y., W.N. E, and Robbins, M.O., 2004, “A continuum and molecular dynamics hybrid method for micro- and nano-fluid flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 500, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noh, W.F., 1964, “CEL: a time-dependent two-dimensional coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian code,” in Methods in Computational Physics, ed. Alder, B.J.. Academic Press, 117–180.Google Scholar

Peierls, R.E., 1945, “Theory of von Neumann’s method of treating shocks,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-332.Google Scholar

Pope, S. B., 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, D.H., Pouquet, A., and Woodward, P.R., 1994, “Kolmogorov-like spectra in decaying three-dimensional supersonic flows,” Phys. Fluids 6, 2133–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reif, F., 1965, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, McGraw-Hill, 475–476.Google Scholar

Ren, W. and Weinan, E, 2005, “Heterogeneous multiscale method for the modeling of complex fluids and micro–fluidics,” J. Comput. Phys. 204, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richtmyer, R.D., 1948, ”Proposed numerical method for calculation of shocks,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-671.Google Scholar

Sagaut, P., 2006, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B., 1969, “Electron beam density measurements in shock waves in argon,” J. Fluid Mech. 39, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, F.G., 2007, “About Boussinesq’s turbulent viscosity hypothesis: Historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity,” C.R. Mecanique 335, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shan, X., Yuan, X-F., and Chen, H., 2006, “Kinetic theory representation of hydrodynamics: A way beyond the Navier-Stokes equation,” J. Fluid Mech. 550, 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shashkov, M., 1996, Conservative Finite Diference Methods on General Grids, CRC Press.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, J., 1963, “ General circulation experiments with the primitive equations I. The basic experiment,” Mon. Wea. Rev. 91, 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smagorinsky, J., 1983, “The beginnings of numerical weather prediction and general circulation modeling: early recollections,” Adv. Geophys. 25, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smolarkiewicz, P.K. and Margolin, L.G., 1998, “MPDATA: A finite-difference solver for geophysical flows,” J. Comput. Phys. 140, 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stull, R.B., 1991, “Review of non-local mixing in turbulent atmospheres: transilient turbulence theory,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology 62, 21–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L., 1972, A First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tikhonov, A.N. and Samarskii, A.A., 1962, “Homogeneous difference schemes,” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 1, 5–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uribe, F.J., 2011, “The shock wave problem revisited: The Navier–Stokes equations and Brenner’s two velocity hydrodynamics,” in Coping with Complexity: Model Reduction and Data Analysis, ed. by Gorban, A.N. and Roose, D., Springer–Verlag, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Leer, B., 1979, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme 5: 2nd-order sequel to Godunov’s method,” J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Neumann, J. and Richtmyer, R.D., 1950, “A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks,” J. Appl. Phys. 21, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wesseling, P., 2001, Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, M.L., 1964, “Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow,” in Methods in Computational Physics, ed. Alder, B.J., Academic Press, 211–263.Google Scholar

Wilkins, M.L., 1980, “Use of artificial viscosity in multidimensional fluid dynamic calculations,” J. Comput. Phys. 36, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, S.A., Bell, J.B., and Garcia, A.L., 2008, “Algorithm refinement for fluctuating hydrodynamics,” Multiscale Model. Simul. 6, 1256–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winckelmans, G., Wray, A., Vasilyev, O., and Jeanmart, O., 2001, “Explicit filtering large edddy simulation using the tensor diffusivity model supplemented by a dynamic Smagorinsky term,” Phys. Fluids 13, 1385–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F.F., Wachtor, A.J., and Haines, B.M., 2014, “Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large eddy simulation,” Phys. Rev. E 89, 013303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sagaut, P. (2006). Large Eddy Simulation for incompressible flows. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Grinstein, F.F, Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J. (2010). Implicit Large Eddy Simulation, 2nd printing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L. (1972). A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, S., Meneveau, C., and Katz, J. (1994). “On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet.” J. Fluid Mech. 275:83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardina, J., Ferziger, J.H., and Reynolds, W.C. (1980). “Improved turbulence models for large eddy simulation.” AIAA paper 80-1357.Google Scholar

Clark, R.A., Fertziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C. (1979). “Evaluation of subgrid models using accurately simulated turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 91:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galdi, G.P., Layton, W.J. (2000). “Approximating the larger eddies in fluid flows II: a model for space filtered flow.” Math. Models and Meth. in Appld. Sciences 10(3):343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G. and Rider, W.J. (2002). “A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling.” Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 39:821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolin, L.G., Rider, W.J., and Grinstein, F.F. (2006). “Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES.” J. Turbulence 7:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirt, C.W. (1968). “Heuristic stability theory for finite difference equations.” J. Comput. Phys. 2, 339355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F. (1999). “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows.” AIAA Journal 37:544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyink, G. (2006). “Multi-scale gradient expansion of the turbulent stress tensor.” J. Fluid Mech. 549:159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S.B. (2000). Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ristorcelli, J.R., Margolin, L.G., and Grinstein, F.F. (2011). “Moment analysis of Finite Scale Navier Stokes for coarse grained computations of turbulent mixing.” Los Alamos National Laboratory report: LA-UR-11-03387.Google Scholar

Lumley, J.L. (1970). Stochastic Tools in Turbulence. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lumley, J.L. (1978). “Computational modeling of turbulent flows.” Adv. Appl. Mech. 18:123–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wachtor, A.J., Grinstein, F.F., DeVore, C.R., Ristorcelli, J.R., and Margolin, L.G. (2013). “Implicit large-eddy simulation of passive scalar mixing in statistically stationary isotropic turbulence.” Physics of Fluids 25(2), 025101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinstein, F.F., Gowardhan, A.A., Ristorcelli, J.R., Wachtor, A.J., and Gowardhan, A.J. (2012). “On coarse-grained simulations of turbulent material mixing.” Physica Scripta 86(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bensow, R.E. and Fureby, C. (2008). “On the justification and extension of mixed models in LES.” J Turbulence, 8(54):1–17.Google Scholar

Boris, J.P. (1990). “On large eddy simulation using subgrid turbulence models.” In Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, ed. by Lumley, J.L., Springer, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, U. (1995). Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layton, W.J. (2000). “Approximating the larger eddies in fluid motion V: Kinetic energy balance of scale similarity models.” Math. Comp. Modelling 31:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leveque, R.J. (2002). Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Overholt, M.R. and Pope, S. B. (1996). “Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence.” Physics of Fluids 8, 3128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ristorcelli, J.R. (2006). “Passive scalar mixing: analytic study of time scale ratio, variance and mix rate.” Phys. Fluids A 3:1269–1277.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, J. (1963). “General circulation experiments with primitive equations: I. Basic equations.” Mon. Weather Rev 91:99–264.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar