Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:11:00.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Zombie Jurisprudence

from Part III - Structures of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Omri Ben-Zvi
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 406 - 427
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 21

Beaney, Michael (ed.) 2007. The Analytic Turn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael 2013a. “What is analytic philosophy?” in Beaney, (ed.), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael (ed.) 2013b. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Paul F. 1996. “The chaotic pseudotext,” Michigan Law Review 94: 2178–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1989. “The religiously devout judge,” Notre Dame Law Review 64: 932–44.Google Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie 1990. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules and Scott, Shapiro (eds.), 2002. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Joanne 2013. Law and Gender. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2012. “Experimental pragmatism in the third globalization,” Contemporary Pragmatism 9: 181–204.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014a. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1042–98.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014b. “Back in style,” Law & Critique 25: 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: i–x.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2016. “A context for legal history, or, this is not your father's contextualism,” American Journal of Legal History 56: 29–40.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, Costas 2000. The End of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2014. “A Short history of the British critical legal conference or, the responsibility of the critic,” Law & Critique 25: 187–98.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2006. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Enoch, David 2011. “Reason-giving and the law,” in Green, and Leiter, (eds.), pp. 35–73.Google Scholar
Enoch, David. Unpublished. “Is general jurisprudence interesting?” https://www.academia.edu/11623290/Is_General_Jurisprudence_InterestingGoogle Scholar
Finkin, Matthew W. 2011. “The death and transfiguration of labor law,” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 33: 171–86.Google Scholar
Fischl, Richard M. 1992. “The question that killed critical legal studies,” Law & Social Inquiry 17: 779–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1986. “The death of the law?” Cornell Law Review 72: 1–16.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun 2012. “On the possibility of naturalizing phenomenology,” in Zahavi, (ed.) pp. 70–85.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Grant 1974. The Death of Contract. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Glendinning, Simon 2006. The Idea of Continental Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2004. “Satirical legal studies: from the legists to the lizard,” Michigan Law Review 103: 397–517.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2017. “Who are we? Persona, office, suspicion, and critique,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian (eds.) 2011. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2011. “The Standard picture and its discontents,” in Green, and Leiter, (eds.), pp. 39–104.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2014. “The moral impact theory of law,” Yale Law Journal 123: 1288–343.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2016. “How to explain things with force,” Harvard Law Review 129: 1932–980.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2012. The Concept of Law. Craig, Paul (ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, Scott 2015. “The end of jurisprudence,” Yale Law Journal 124: 1160–1205.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1986. “Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology,” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2004. “Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy: a polemic against the system,” in Kennedy, Duncan (ed.) Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System. New York University Press, pp. 9–144.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law & Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 2015. “Doing without the concept of law,” New York University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Working Paper no. 15–33, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2640605)Google Scholar
Kreitner, Roy 2012. “On the new pluralism in contract theory,” Suffolk University Law Review 45: 915–34.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah and Williford, Kenneth (eds.) 2006. Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian 2004. “The end of empire: Dworkin and jurisprudence in the 21st century,” Rutgers Law Journal 36: 165–18.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian 2007. Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David 2016. “Time mindedness and jurisprudence,” Virginia Law Review 101: 903–17.Google Scholar
May, Todd 2002. “On the very idea of continental (or for that matter Anglo-American) philosophy,” Metaphilosophy 33: 401–25.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. Smith, Colin (transl.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2017. “Legal theory among the ruins,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1974. The Gay Science. Kaufmann, Walter (transl.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R. 1996. “The varieties of legal positivism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 9: 361–81.Google Scholar
Pojanowski, Jeffrey A. 2015. “Redrawing the dividing lines between natural law and positivism(s),” Virginia Law Review 101: 1023–7.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric 2003. “Economic analysis of contract law after three decades: success or failure?” Yale Law Journal 112: 829–80.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2009. Law and Literature. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 2015. “Jurisprudence, the sociable science,” Virginia Law Review 101: 869–902.Google Scholar
Preston, Aaron 2006. Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott 2011. Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2009. The Authority of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reginster, Bernard 2006. The Affirmation of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schaus, Steven 2015. “How to think about law as morality: a comment on Greenberg and Hershovitz,” Yale Law Journal Forum 124: 224–45.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1996. “Hiding the ball,” New York University Law Review 71: 1681–718.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1997. “Law as the continuation of god by other means,” California Law Review 85: 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1998. The enchantment of reason. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1999. “U.S. CLS,” Law & Critique 10: 199–210.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2002. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1047–118.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009. “Formalism and realism in ruins (mapping the logics of collapse),” 95 Iowa Law Review 95: 195–244.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William 1988. “Legal realism now,” California Law Review 76: 465–544.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. 1988. “Why should courts obey the law?” Georgetown Law Journal 77: 113–64.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. 2004. Law's Quandary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 2013. “The role of phenomenology in analytic philosophy,” in Beaney, (ed.), pp. 1117–31.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2002. “Phenomenology and the development of analytic philosophy,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 40: 115–42.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2007a. “In what sense is phenomenology transcendental?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 45: 85–92.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2007b. “Conceptual analysis in phenomenology and ordinary language philosophy,” in Beaney, (ed.), pp. 270–84.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2015. “The presence and absence of legal mind: a comment on Duncan Kennedy's Three Globalizations,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: 1–17.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2017. “Of origin: toward a history of contemporary legal thought,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Burg, Wibren forthcoming. “Law as a second-order essentially contested concept,” JurisprudenceGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2002. “Legal and political philosophy,” in Coleman, and Shapiro, (eds.), pp. 352–81.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. unpublished. “Jurisprudence for hedgehogs,” New York University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Working Paper no. 13–45, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2290309Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. “Legal formalism: on the immanent rationality of law,” Yale Law Journal 97: 949–1016.Google Scholar
Wells, Catharine P. 2012. “Thoughts on Duncan Kennedy's third globalization,” Comparative Law Review 3: 1–10.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (ed.) 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×