Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:35:47.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The Knowledge Bubble: Something Amiss in Expertopia

from Part III - Structures of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Pierre Schlag
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 428 - 453
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 22

Ackerman, Bruce 1993. We the People: Foundations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Thurman 1935. The Symbols of Government. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barzun, Charles 2014. “Inside-out: beyond the internal/external distinction in legal scholarship,” Virginia Law Review 101: 1203–88.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander and Tobin, Emma 2008. “Natural Kinds,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
Bloom, Frederic M. 2005. “Unconstitutional courses,” Washington University Law Quarterly 83: 1679–731.Google Scholar
Bloom, Frederic M. 2015. “The law's clock,” Georgetown Law Journal 104: 1–56.Google Scholar
Clark, David S. (ed.) 2007. International Encyclopedia of Law and Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, William 1955. “Introduction,” in Jaspers, Karl, Reason and Existenz. New York: Noonday Press, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald 1985. “The evolutionary tradition in jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 85: 38–94.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Ann 2012. “Lumpy property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160: 1955–93.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Smith, A. M. Sheridan (transl.). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Freeman, Alan 1981. “Truth and mystification in legal scholarship,” Yale Law Journal 90: 1229–37.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1974. “Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change,” Law & Society Review 9: 95–161.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. 1984. “Value creation by business lawyers: legal skills and asset pricing,” Yale Law Journal 94: 234–313.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert 1923. “Coercion and distribution in a supposedly noncoercive state,” Political Science Quarterly 38: 470–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr. 1959. “Foreword: the time chart of the justices,” Harvard Law Review 73: 84–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 2011. “A rotation in contemporary legal scholarship,” German Law Journal 12: 338–75.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1991. “The stakes of law or Hale and Foucault!” Legal Studies Forum 15: 327–65.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre 1980. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Bloom, Allan (ed.), Nichols, James H., Jr. (transl.). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence 1995. “Understanding changed readings: fidelity and theory,” Stanford Law Review 47: 395–472.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl 1934. “The Constitution as an institution,” Columbia Law Review 34: 1–40.Google Scholar
LoPucki, Lynn M. 2016. “Dawn of the discipline-based law school,” Journal of Legal Education 65: 506–42.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg 1971a. History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg 1971b. “Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat,” in Lukács, Georg 1971a pp. 83–222.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg 1971c. “What is Orthodox Marxism?” in Lukács, Georg 1971a pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2017. “Legal theory among the ruins,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Plato, , 2013. Cratylus. Jowett, Benjamin (transl.) The Internet Classics Archive. Available at http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/cratylus.html.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2009. “The state of legal scholarship today, a comment on Schlag,” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 845–55.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2016. Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Robert and Siegel, Neil S 2007. “Theorizing the law/politics distinction: neutral principles, affirmative action, and the enduring legacy of Paul Mishkin,” California Law Review 95: 1473–513.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 2015. “Jurisprudence – the sociable science,” Virginia Law Review 101: 869–901.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise 2007. “Knowledge about Law,” in Clark, (ed.), pp. 885–8.Google Scholar
Rubio, Fernando Dominguez and Baert, Patrick (eds.) 2012. The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von 1975. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Hayward, Abraham (transl.). New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1989. “The problem of transaction costs,” Southern California Law Review 62: 1661–1700.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1991. “Normativity and the Politics of Form,“ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139: 801–932.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2002. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1047–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009a. “Spam jurisprudence, air law, and the rank anxiety of nothing happening,” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 803–35.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009b. “The dedifferentiation problem,” Continental Philosophy Review 42: 35–62.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2013. “Coase minus the Coase theorem – some problems with Chicago transaction cost analysis,” Iowa Law Review 99: 175–223.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2015. “How to do things with Hohfeld,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 185–234.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Jeanne L. 1991. “Abduction from the seraglio: feminist methodologies and the logic of imagination,” Texas Law Review 70: 109–210.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1989. “The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics,” Harvard Law Review 130: 1–39.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 2009. The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, Robin L. 2009. “A reply to Pierre,” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 865–75.Google Scholar
West, Robin L. 2011. Normative Jurisprudence: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd 1984. When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×