Bhagwati, J. (1993). “Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview,” in de Melo, J. and Panagariya, A. (eds.), New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, J. and Panagariya, A. (eds.) (1996). The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements, Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar

GATT (1979). Differential and More Favourable Treatment, Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries (Enabling Clause), Decision of 28 November 1979 (circulated as L/490), Geneva: GATT.Google Scholar

Kasteng, J. and Prawitz, C. (2013). Eliminating Anti-Dumping Measures in Regional Trade Agreements: The European Union Example, Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Trade.Google Scholar

Prawitz, C. and Kasteng, J. (2013). Effect on Trade and Competition of Abolishing Anti-Dumping Measures: The European Union Experience, Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Trade.Google Scholar

Prusa, T. J. and Teh, R. (2011). “Contingent Protection Rules in Regional Trade Agreements” in Bagwell, K. W. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreements, Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–114.Google Scholar

Rey, J.-D. (2012). “Antidumping Regional Regimes and the Multilateral Trading System: Do Regional Antidumping Regimes Make a Difference?”, Geneva: WTO, Economic Research and Statistics Division Staff Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teh, R., Prusa, T. J. and Budetta, M. (2009). “Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements”, in Estevadeordal, A., Suominen, K. and Teh, R. (eds.), Regional Rules in the Global Trading System, Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–249.Google Scholar

WTO (1999). The Legal Texts – The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (GATT Article XXIV and GATS Article V), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

WTO (2011). World Trade Report 2011 – The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar