Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Anthropological Materialism and the Aesthetics of Film
- 2 Soviet Film: The Giant Laboratory of Technological Innervation
- 3 Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism
- 4 Charlie Chaplin: The Return of the Allegorical Mode in Modernity
- 5 Mickey Mouse: Utopian and Barbarian
- Conclusion : Benjamin’s Belated Aktualität
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - Soviet Film: The Giant Laboratory of Technological Innervation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2020
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Anthropological Materialism and the Aesthetics of Film
- 2 Soviet Film: The Giant Laboratory of Technological Innervation
- 3 Film and the Aesthetics of German Fascism
- 4 Charlie Chaplin: The Return of the Allegorical Mode in Modernity
- 5 Mickey Mouse: Utopian and Barbarian
- Conclusion : Benjamin’s Belated Aktualität
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Abstract
This chapter analyses the two articles on Soviet film that Walter Benjamin wrote after his stay in Moscow: ‘On the Present Situation of Russian Film’ (1927) and ‘Reply to Oscar A. H. Schmitz’ (1927). These early texts on film are discussed in connection with ‘The Author as Producer’ (1934) and ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility’ (1935–1939), for they anticipate the debate about film and the politicization of art discussed in the latter texts. This chapter also discusses Benjamin's insights about the use and conception of technology in the Soviet Union, the different political groupings in the Soviet art scene, and his position in these debates.
Keywords: Walter Benjamin; Soviet cinema; Dziga Vertov; Sergei M. Eisenstein; Battleship Potemkin; One-Sixth of the World.
The first two texts that Walter Benjamin wrote on film were published in the journal Die literarische Welt in March 1927. Both articles, entitled ‘On the Present Situation of Russian Film’ and ‘Reply to Oscar A. H. Schmitz’, were written after Benjamin's stay in Moscow from 9 December 1926 to 1 February 1927 and focussed on Soviet cinema. These texts analysed the situation of cinema in the first years of the Soviet Union and started to address some primary concerns regarding the technological nature of this new art form alongside the politicization of aesthetics, anticipating many important themes of essays such as ‘The Author as Producer’ (1934) and ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility’ (1935–1939). The reception of Soviet film in the Weimar Republic provoked varied responses, from those on the left and the right, from journalists, intellectuals, and film theorists. The terms of aesthetics and politics were the subject of intense debate, especially after the release of Battleship Potemkin (Bronenosets Potemkin, dir. Sergei M. Eisenstein, 1925), which premiered in a censored version in Berlin on 29 April 1926 One of the first reviews of the film came from Siegfried Kracauer, who published a passionately positive critique of the film. Kracauer declared that Potemkin showed ‘something fundamentally different’, ‘a moment of revolution’, achieved by means purely cinematographic. He argued that Eisenstein might ‘be the first to have used cinematic means to represent a reality’, since the film shows something ‘genuine’, from which ‘true content emerges’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Film , pp. 87 - 116Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2020