Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:43:04.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (Or at least give us some criteria to work with)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Richard P. Meier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Liddell's proposal that there are gestures in agreement verbs

Forty years of research on signed languages has revealed the unquestionable fact that signers construct their utterances in a structured way from units that are defined within a language system. They do not pantomime or “draw pictures in the air.” But does this mean that every aspect of a signed articulation should have the same status as a linguistic unit?

A proposal by Liddell (1995; 1996; Liddell and Metzger 1998) has brought the issue of the linguistic status of certain parts of American Sign Language (ASL) utterances to the fore. He proposes that agreement verbs are not verbs simultaneously articulated with agreement morphemes, but verbs simultaneously articulated with pointing gestures. Agreement verbs are verbs that move to locations in signing space associated with particular referents in the discourse. A signer may establish a man on the left side at location x and a woman on the right side at location y. Then, to sign ‘He asks her,’ the signer moves the lexical sign ASK from location x to location y. The locations in these constructions have been analyzed as agreement morphemes (Fischer and Gough 1978; Klima and Bellugi 1979; Padden 1988; Liddell and Johnson 1989; Lillo-Martin and Klima 1990; Aarons et al. 1992) that combine with the lexical verb to form a multimorphemic sign x ASKy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarons, Debra, Benjamin, Bahan, Judy, Kegl, and Carol, Neidle. 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15:103–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, Rudolf. 1969. Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Bos, Heleen. 1996. Serial verb constructions in the sign language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 5thInternational Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Montreal, September
Duncan, Susan. 1998. Evidence from gesture for a conceptual nexus of action and entity. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, Emory University, October
Emmorey, Karen. 1999. Do signers gesture? In Gesture, speech, and sign, eds. Lynn Messing and Ruth Campbell, 133–159. New York: Oxford University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fischer, Susan and Bonnie Gough. 1978. Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 18:17–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyd, Jennifer. 1983. Shareability: The social psychology of epistemology. Cognitive Science 7: 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. The structure of phonological representations, I, ed. Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, 131–177. Dordrecht: Foris
Kita, Sotaro. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In Language and gesture, ed. David McNeill, 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Klima, Edward and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Ladd, Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Cognitive Grammar. In Linguistic theory and grammatical description, ed. Flip Droste and John Joseph, 275–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Liddell, Scott. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, gesture, and space, eds. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Liddell, Scott. 1996. Spatial representation in discourse: Comparing spoken and signed language. Lingua 98:145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott and Robert, Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64:195–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott. and Melanie, Metzger. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30:657–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane and Edward Klima. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical issues in sign language research: Vol. 1, eds. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 191–210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Marschark, Mark. 1994. Gesture and sign. Applied Psycholinguistics 15:209–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
McNeill, David. 1997. Growth points cross-linguistically. In Language and conceptualization, eds. Jan Nuyts and Eric Pederson, 190–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McNeill, David, Justine, Cassell, and Elena, Levy. 1993. Abstract deixis. Semiotica 95: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David, Justine, Cassell, and Karl-Erik, McCullough. 1994. Communicative effects of speech-mismatched gestures. Research on language and social interaction 27:223–237Google Scholar
McNeill, David and Laura Pedelty. 1995. Right brain and gesture. In Language, gesture, and space, eds. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Meier, Richard. 1987. Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined?Journal of Memory and Language 26:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. Carol Padden. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf
Newport, Elissa and Richard Meier. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, ed. Daniel Slobin. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Padden, Carol, 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland
Petitto, Laura. 1987. On the autonomy of language and gesture: Evidence from the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Cognition 27:1–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poizner, Howard, Edward Klima, and Ursula Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Taub, Sarah. 1998. Language in the body: iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Webb, Rebecca. 1996. Linguistic features of metaphoric gestures. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Integration of Gesture in Language and Speech, ed. Lynn Messing, 79–93. Newark, DE: University of Delaware
Woodbury, Anthony. 1987. Meaningful phonological processes: A consideration of Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo prosody. Language 63:685–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×