Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Economic Rights: The Terrain
- SECTION I CONCEPTS
- 2 The West and Economic Rights
- 3 Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights
- 4 Economic Rights in the Knowledge Economy: An Instrumental Justification
- 5 “None So Poor That He Is Compelled to Sell Himself”: Democracy, Subsistence, and Basic Income
- 6 Benchmarking the Right to Work
- SECTION II MEASUREMENT
- SECTION III POLICY ISSUES
- APPENDIX 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- APPENDIX 2 International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
- Index
- References
6 - Benchmarking the Right to Work
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Economic Rights: The Terrain
- SECTION I CONCEPTS
- 2 The West and Economic Rights
- 3 Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights
- 4 Economic Rights in the Knowledge Economy: An Instrumental Justification
- 5 “None So Poor That He Is Compelled to Sell Himself”: Democracy, Subsistence, and Basic Income
- 6 Benchmarking the Right to Work
- SECTION II MEASUREMENT
- SECTION III POLICY ISSUES
- APPENDIX 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- APPENDIX 2 International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The prevailing view among both progressive and conservative economists in the United States today is that unemployment cannot be driven much below the 4 to 6 percent range – well above the 2% level that progressive economists in the 1940s considered achievable (Clark et al. 1949, 14).
This is an uncomfortable reminder that in an earlier era progressives had higher hopes concerning the possibilities for eliminating involuntary unemployment than they do today. In the 1940s, progressives thought they could guarantee the availability of enough good jobs to provide decent work for all job-seekers, thereby moving from a world of perennial job shortages to one of sustained “full employment” in which the “right to work” would be secured. Today, few progressive economists (and fewer still of those who have the ear of progressive policy makers) think that goal is achievable. Instead, they implicitly or explicitly accept the view that job shortages are either inevitable in a market economy or cannot be eliminated except by making unacceptable sacrifices in job quality, and that public policy accordingly should aim to ameliorate the bad effects of those shortages rather than eliminate them.
Why does this matter? It matters because the achievement of full, and decent, employment occupies a foundational role in the vision of a good society – that has guided progressive reform efforts ever since the end of World War II – was built in the 1940s, and for which no satisfactory substitute has yet to been found.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Economic RightsConceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues, pp. 115 - 142Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
1983. Structural/Frictional vs. Deficient Demand Unemployment: Some New Evidence. American Economic Review 73: 708–24.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1945. Statement of Essential Human Rights. Reprinted in Louis B. Sohn. 1995. How American International Lawyers Prepared for the San Francisco Bill of Rights, American Journal of International Law 89 (3): 540–53.
, and . 2003. The Benefits of Full Employment: When Markets Work for People. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
. 1949. National and International Measures for Full Employment. Lake Success, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
Committee on Economic Security. 1935. Report of the Committee on Economic Security, 15 January 1935. Reprinted in National Conference on Social Welfare. 1985. The Report of the Committee on Economic Security of 1935 and Other Basic Documents Relating to the Development of the Social Security Act.
Employment & Training Institute. 1993–present. Survey of Job Openings in the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (biannual).
. 2003. Defining and Measuring Unmet Labour Demand. Swedish Institute for Social Research: Stockholm University and Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
. 2001. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
. 1989. Securing the Right to Employment: Social Welfare Policy and the Unemployed in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995a. Paying for Full Employment: A Hard-Nosed Look at Finances. Social Policy 25: 21–30.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Fashioning A Work-Based Strategy for Welfare Reform Based on International Human Rights Doctrine. Journal of Public Health Policy 16: 269–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Liberal Strategies for Combating Joblessness in the Twentieth Century. Journal of Economic Issues 33: 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000a. Combating Joblessness: An Analysis of the Principal Strategies that Have Influenced the Development of American Employment and Social Welfare Law during the 20th Century. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 21: 677–758.Google Scholar
. 2000b. Direct Job Creation. In Commitment to Full Employment: Macroeconomics and Social Policy in Memory of William Vickrey, ed. et al., 35–54. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
. 2002. Human Rights and Economic Policy Discourse: Taking Economic and Social Human Rights Seriously. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 33: 363–471.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Right to Work and Basic Income Guarantees: A Comparative Assessment, Paper presented at the Second Congress of the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network, New York City, Feb. 21–23, 2003. USBIG Discussion Paper No. 57. Available at: http://www.usbig.net.Google Scholar
. 2005. Basic Income and the Right to Work: Competing or Complementary Goals. Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy 2: 2–59.Google Scholar
1989. Unemployment Vacancies and Local Labor Markets. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. What Employers Want: Job Prospects for Less-educated Workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 1964. Employment Policy Convention (Convention 122).
International Labour Organization. 2002. Global Employment Agenda. Geneva: International Labour Office. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/empframe/ practice/download/gea.pdf.
International Labour Organization. 2003. Special Issue: Measuring Decent Work. International Labour Review 142: 109–271.
. 1999. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The Political Failure of Employment Policy: 1945–1982. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
National Resources Planning Board. 1943. National Resources Development Report for 1943, H.R. Doc. No. 78–128, pt. 3, Security, Work and Relief Policies.
, and Daniel Raventos. 2002. Basic Income, Social Polarization and the Right to Work. In Promoting Income Security as a Right: Europe and North America, ed. , 269–84. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
. 1957. The Meaning and Measurement of Full Employment. In The Measurement and Behavior of Unemployment, 13–49. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
. 2004. El Derecho Al Trabajo, ¿Forma De Exclusión Social? Las Rentas Mínimas De Integración Y La Propuesta Del Ingreso Básico. Revista Icade 62: 239–69.Google Scholar
1944. Message to Congress on the State of the Union, 11 January 1944. Reprinted in The Public Papers & Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, ed. , 13: 32–42. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1950.Google Scholar
. 2000. Decent Work for All in a Global Economy. Address to the staff of the World Bank, 2 March 2000. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/ dgo/speeches/somavia/2000/worldbk.htm.
1968. Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson Years. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by