Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T02:36:56.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Frequency division

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2009

Andrea Leonardo Lacaita
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Salvatore Levantino
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Carlo Samori
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Get access

Summary

Introduction

PLLs designed for frequency synthesis employ a variable-frequency divider, which provides programmability and enables the use of reference crystal oscillators. The two main issues related to the design of the frequency divider are the high input frequency and the programmability of the division factor. As will be made clearer in this chapter, wide variations of the division factor and high input frequency are opposing requests. To some extent, higher operation frequency can be traded against power consumption. However, as we will show, smart architectural choices can allow for much higher frequency of operation with the same power consumption and technology process. The input sensitivity that is the minimum required amplitude of the input signal is also of great concern in high-speed dividers.

Digital dividers are based on either flip-flops or latches, using either static or dynamic logics. Analogue implementations of divide-by-two circuits relying on injection locking or parametric amplification also exist. Depending on their implementation, dividers have different noise generation mechanisms. However, a lower phase noise generally demands higher power consumption.

This chapter discusses typical techniques for realizing programmable dividers, with particular emphasis on such topologies as allow for maximum speed in a given semiconductor process. The circuit implementations of the building blocks will be reviewed. Finally, methods for predicting the noise of digital frequency dividers will be examined.

Digital frequency dividers

Digital frequency dividers by M are modulo-M counters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Razavi, B., RF Microelectronics, New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
Egan, W. F., Frequency Synthesis by Phase Lock, New York, NY: Wiley, 2nd edn, 2000, 142–6.Google Scholar
Adler, R., A study of locking phenomena in oscillators, P. IEEE, 61, Oct. 1973, 1380–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foroudi, N. and Kwasniewski, T. A., CMOS high-speed dual-modulus frequency divider for RF frequency synthesis, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 30, Feb. 1995, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.-C. and Razavi, B., A stabilization technique for phase-locked frequency synthesizers, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 38, Jun. 2003, 888–94.Google Scholar
Sheng, N.-H.et al., A high-speed multimodulus HBT prescaler for frequency synthesizer applications, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 26, Oct. 1991, 1362–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, P., High-speed architecture for a programmable frequency divider and a dual-modulus prescaler, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 31, May 1996, 744–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucher, C. S., Ferencic, I., Locher, M.et al., A family of low-power truly modular programmable dividers in standard 0.35-µm CMOS technology, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 35, Jul. 2000, 1039–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craninckx, J. and Steyaert, M. S. J., A 1.75-GHz/3-V dual-modulus divide-by-128/129 prescaler in 0.7-µm CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 31, Jul. 1996, 890–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnapura, N. and Kinget, P. R., A 5.3-GHz programmable divider for HiPerLAN in 0.25-µm CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 35, Jul. 2000, 1019–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. H. Perrot, Techniques for High Data Rate Modulation and Low Power Operation of Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer, Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
Benachour, A., Embabi, S. H. K. and Ali, A., A 1.5 GHz, sub-2 mW CMOS dual modulus prescaler, in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., San Diego, CA, 1999, 613–16.Google Scholar
Shu, K., Sánchez-Sinencio, E., Silva-Martínez, J. and Embabi, S. H. K., A 2.4-GHz monolithic fractional-N frequency synthesizer with robust phase-switching prescaler and loop capacitance multiplier, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 38, Jun. 2003, 866–74.Google Scholar
Leung, G. C. T. and Luong, H. C., A 1-V 5.2-GHz CMOS synthesizer for WLAN applications, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, Nov. 2004, 1873–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zargari, M.et al., A single-chip dual-band tri-mode CMOS transceiver for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g wireless LAN, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, Dec. 2004, 2239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, H., Biyani, M. and , K. K. O, A high-speed CMOS dual-phase dynamic-pseudo NMOS ((DP)2) latch and its application in a dual-modulus prescaler, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 34, Oct. 1999, 1400–4.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. and Svensson, C., High-speed CMOS circuit technique, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 24, Feb. 1989, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Q. and Rogenmoser, R., Speed optimization of edge-triggered CMOS circuits for gigahertz single-phase clocks, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 31, Mar. 1996, 456–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B. De Muer and M. Steyaert, A single ended 1.5 GHz 8/9 dual modulus prescaler in 0.7-µm CMOS technology with low phase noise and high input sensitivity, in Proc. 1998 Eur. Solid-State Circuits Conf., 1998, 256–9.
Soares, J. Navarro and Noije, W. A. M., A 1.6-GHz dual modulus prescaler using the extended true-single-phase-clock CMOS circuit technique (E-TSPC), IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 34, Jan. 1999, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoji, M., FET scaling in domino CMOS gates, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 20, Oct. 1985, 1067–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, W. F., Modeling phase noise in frequency dividers, IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr., 37, Jul. 1990, 307–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroupa, V. F., Jitter and phase noise in frequency dividers, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 50, Oct. 2001, 1241–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levantino, S., Romanò, L., Pellerano, S., Samori, C. and Lacaita, A. L., Phase noise in digital frequency dividers, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, May 2004, 775–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneep, J. G. and Verhoeven, C. J. M., A new low-noise 100-MHz balanced relaxation oscillator, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 25, Jun. 1990, 692–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutman, J. and Walls, F. L., Characterization of frequency stability in precision frequency sources, P. IEEE, 79, Jun. 1991, 952–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×