Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:31:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The urban ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Major ecosystems can be broadly classified as natural, agricultural, and urban. Natural ecosystems are primitive sites where the interacting plant and animal communities have not been altered by human activity. There are few, if any, of these in the world today, and a more practical definition of natural ecosystems might be undisturbed habitats that have had limited human influence, and retain a portion of their original flora and fauna. An important feature of these habitats is the populations of native plants and animals. These are the reservoir populations of many species that have adapted to agricultural and urban conditions. Agricultural and urban ecosystems are defined by their use and the degree to which their biotic and abiotic features have been altered by human activity. These ecosystems contain few of the features that characterize their natural origins; many of the features were built or brought there, or designed by humans. The degree of change and land use can be used to subdivide these two cultural ecosystems.

Agroecosystem A is the least developed form of agriculture. It consists of small farms with a mix of domesticated animals and crop plants; it is generally expected to provide food and fiber for family groups or communities. Agroecosystem B is the most developed form of agriculture. It is characterized as mechanized farming of a single crop (soybeans, maize, wheat) or single-animal species (swine, cattle, poultry). Modern definitions of this ecosystem would include use of genetically improved or engineered crops.

Type
Chapter
Information
Urban Insects and Arachnids
A Handbook of Urban Entomology
, pp. 6 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audy, J. R.The localization of disease with special reference to the zoonoses. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 52 (1958), 308–28Google ScholarPubMed
Bishop, J. A.An experimental study of the cline of industrial melanism in Biston betularia (L.) between urban Liverpool and rural North Wales. J. Anim. Ecol., 41 (1972), 209–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyden, S. and Millar, S.. Human ecology and the quality of life. Urban Ecol., 3 (1976), 263–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, R. F., Tobias, T., Eagles, P. F. J.et al. A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographical landscape units. Urban Ecol., 4 (1979), 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, R. and M. G. Villani (eds.) Handbook of Turfgrass Insects. College Park, MD: Entomological Society of America, 1995
Bruce-Chwatt, L. J.Endemic diseases, demography and socioeconomic development of tropical Africa. Can. J. Pub. Health, 66 (1975), 31–7Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, D. M.Seasonal variation of tabanids (Diptera) in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Can. Ent., 91 (1959), 548–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. N. K.Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. Biol. Conserv., 10 (1978), 249–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreistadt, S. H., Dahlsten, D. L., and Frankie, G. W.. Urban forests and insect ecology. BioScience, 40 (1990), 192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, M., Yamada, M., Hirowatari, T., and Yasuda, T.. Diversity of butterfly communities in urban parks in Osaka prefecture (in Japanese). Jpn J. Environ. Entomol. Zool., 3 (1991), 183–95Google Scholar
Johnson, W. T. and H. H. Lyon. Insects that feed on Trees and Shrubs. New York: Comstoack, 1991
Kimura, Y.Defoliate insect pests in urban green zones (in Japanese). Jpn J. Environ. Entomol. Zool., 3 (1991), 217–24Google Scholar
Lutz, F. E. A Lot of Insects (Entomology in a Suburban Garden). New York, NY: Putnam Sons, 1941
Minar, J. Synanthropisation and spreading of Dermestidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). In Robinson, W. H., F. Rettich, and G. W. Rambo (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests, p. 657. Hronov, Czech Republic: Grafické Závody, 1999
Naveh, Z.Landscape ecology as an emerging branch of human ecosystem science. Adv. Ecological Res., 12 (1982), 189–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povolony, D. Synanthropy. In Greenberg, B. (ed.) Flies and Disease, pp. 17–54. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971
Anginao, E. E., Magnuson, L. M., and Stewart, G. F.. Effects of urbanisation on storm water runoff quality: a limited experiment, Naismith Ditch, Lawrence, Kansas. Water Resources Res., 8 (1972), 135–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. N. K.Urbanization and the diversity of insects. Biol. Conserv., 10 (1978), 249–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detwyler, T. R. and M. G. Marcus. Urbanization and Environment: The Physical Geography of the City. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1972
Duckworth, F. S. and Sandberg, J. S.. The effect of cities on horizontal and vertical temperature gradients. Bull. Am. Meterol. Soc., 35 (1954), 198–207Google Scholar
Extence, C. A.The effect of motorway construction on an urban stream. Environ. Pollut., 17 (1978), 245–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faeth, S. H. and Kane, T. C.. Urban biogeography: city parks as islands for Diptera and Coleoptera. Oecologia, 32 (1962), 127–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. H.Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology, 57 (1976), 141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, B. M.The problem of urban dogs. Science, 185 (1974), 903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. and P. Bonnett. Nature in the Urban Landscape. A Study of City Ecosystems. Baltimore, MD: York, 1973
Hogg, I. D. and Norris, R. H.. Effects of run-off from land clearing and urban development on the distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates in pool areas of a river. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Biol., 42 (1991), 507–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, H. E. Climates and urban planning. In Urban Climates. World Meterological Association no. 254. Technical paper 141, note 108, pp. 364–74. Geneva: World Meterological Association, 1970
Legner, E. F. and Olton, G. S.. Distribution and relative abundance of dipterous pupae and their parasitoids in accumulations of domestic animal manure in the southwestern United States. Hilgardia, 40 (1971), 505–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lussenhop, J.The soil arthropod community of a Chicago expressway margin. Ecology 54 (1973), 1124–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsome, E. M.Arthropod problems in recreation areas. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 22 (1977), 333–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. and Owen, D. F.. Suburban gardens: England's most important nature reserve. Environ. Conserv., 2 (1975), 53–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, F.Urban ecology today. Science 170 (1970), 1006–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streu, H. T.The turfgrass ecosystem: impact of pesticides. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 19 (1973), 89–91Google Scholar
Surtees, G.Urbanization and the epidemiology of mosquito-borne diseases. Abstr. Hyg., 46 (1971), 121–34Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Biozönotische Untersuchungen an Ruderalstellen. Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 81 (1952), 122–74Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Untersuchungen über das Hypolithion einer Hausterrasse. Pedobiologia, 6 (1966), 12–36Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Ecology of arthropod fauna in man-made habitats: the problem of synanthropy. Zool. Anz., 191 (1973), 157–61Google Scholar
Wilton, D. P.Dog excrement as a factor in community fly problems. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc., 18 (1963), 311–17Google Scholar
Woodroffe, G. E.The biological origin of our domestic insect pests. Biol. Hum. Aff., 18 (1952), 1–5Google Scholar
Zuska, J. and Lastovka, P.. Species-composition of the dipterous fauna in various types of food-processing plants in Czechoslovakia. Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov., 66 (1969), 201–21Google Scholar
Back, E. A.Gryllus domesticus L. and city dumps. J. Econ. Entomol., 29 (1936), 198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, C. J. Trends in urban refuse disposal: a pest's perspective. In Robinson, W. H., F. Rettich, and G. W. Rambo (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests, pp. 83–99. Hronov, Czech Republic: Grafické Závody, 1999
Bowerman, A. G. and Redente, E. F.. Biointrusion of protective barriers at hazardous waste sites. J. Environ. Qual., 27 (1988), 625–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calisir, B. and Polat, E.. An investigation into the fly fauna of five refuse tips in Istanbul. Turkiye Parazitoliji Dergisi, 17 (1993), 119–29Google Scholar
Campbell, E. and Black, R. J.. The problems of migration of mature fly larvae from refuse containers and its implication on the frequency of refuse collection. Calif. Vec. Views, 7 (1960), 9–16Google Scholar
Crawford, R. L.Autumn populations of spiders and other arthropods in an urban landfill. Northwest Sci., 53 (1979), 51–3Google Scholar
Darlington, A. Ecology of Refuse Tips. London: Heineman Educational Books, 1969
Deonier, C. C.Insect pests breeding in vegetable refuse in Arizona. J. Econ. Entomol., 35 (1972), 457–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirlbek, K. Species, daily frequency and succession of Diptera on refuse depositions of communal waste in Prague. In Kluzak, Z. (ed.) Dipterologica Bohemoslovaka IV. Sbornik referatuz VIII celostatniho dipterologiceho seminare v Ceskych Budejovicich, pp. 109–11. Ceske Budejovice, Czechoslovakia: Jihoceske Muzeum, 1986
Feachem, R. G., D. J. Bradley, H. Garelick, and D. Duncan Mara (eds.) Sanitation and Disease: Health Aspects of Excreta and Wastewater Management. Chichester: John Wiley, 1983
Ilgaz, A., Ozgur, Y., Ak, S., Turan, N., and Gun, H.. Isolation and identification of bacteria from flies collected from garbage in Istanbul, and their effect on human health. Turk. J. Infect., 9 (1995), 131–6Google Scholar
Imai, C.Population dynamics of houseflies, Musca domestica, on experimentally accumulated refuse. Res. Popul. Ecol., 26 (1984), 353–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. Influence of the refuse dump biotopes on ecology of some gamasoid mites and ticks. Modern acarology. In Dusbabek, F. and V. Bukva (eds.), vol. I. Proceedings of the VIII International Congress of Acarology, vol. I. The Hague, Netherlands: Academic, 1991
Magy, H. I. and Black, R. J.. An evaluation of the migration of fly larvae from garbage cans in Pasadena, California. Calif. Vector Views, 9 (1962), 55–9Google Scholar
Nuorteva, P., Kotimaa, T., Pohjolainen, L., and Räsänen, T.. Blowflies (Dipt., Calliphoridae) on the refuse depot of the city of Kuopio in Central Finland. Ann. Entomol. Fenn., 30 (1964), 94–104Google Scholar
Nuorteva, P., Kolehmainen, K. M., Korhonen, K. M., et al. The dimensions of nuisance caused by city garbage dumps to people living in their vicinity. Ymparisto ja Terveys, 11 (1980), 33–7Google Scholar
Quarterman, K. D., Baker, W. C., and Jensen, J. A.. The importance of sanitation in municipal fly control. Am. J. Trop. Med., 29 (1949), 973–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, W. and Haschemi, H.. Dispersal and emigration of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus (L.) (Ensifera, Gryllidae) and the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea, Blattellidae), of a rubbish tip. Z. Ang. Zoo., 80 (1994), 249–58Google Scholar
Strazdine, V.Anthropogenic impact on insect larvae. Complexes of insect larvae and their succession in composted municipal solid garbage. Ekologiya, 2 (1996), 48–58Google Scholar
Süss, L., S. Cassani, B. Serra, and M. Caimi. Integrated pest management for control of the house fly Musca domestica (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) in an urban solid waste treatment plant. In Robinson, W. H., F. Rettich, and G. W. Rambo (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests, pp. 261–9. Hronov, Czech Republic: Grafické Závody, 1999
Toyama, G. M.A preliminary survey of fly breeding at sanitary landfills in Hawaii with an evaluation of landfill practices and their effect on fly breeding. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc., 28 (1988), 49–56Google Scholar
Walden, B. H.Abundance of the German roach in a city dump, Blattella germanica Linn. Conn. Agr. Stat. Bull., 234 (1922), 188–9Google Scholar
Williams, P. T. Waste Treatment and Disposal. London: John Wiley, 1998
Wilton, D. P.Refuse containers as a source of flies in Honolulu and nearby communities. Proc. Hawaiian Entom. Soc., 17 (1961), 477–81Google Scholar
Abrams, C. Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1964
Back, K. W. Slums, Projects and People, Puerto Rico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1962
Kleevens, J. W. L.Housing, urbanization and health in developing (tropical) countries. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. Suppl., 77 (1971), 60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majzlan, O. and Holecova, M.. Anthropocoenoses of an orchard ecosystem in urban agglomerations. Ekologia (Bratislava) 12 (1993), 121–9Google Scholar
Ragheb, I. Patterns of urban growth in the Middle East. In Breese, G. (ed.) The City in Developing Countries: Readings on Urbanism and Urbanization. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1969
Samaj, B. S. Slums of Old Delhi. Delhi: Atma Ram, 1958
Turner, J. C. Limas Barriadas and Corralones: Suburbs vs. Slums. Ekistics, vol. 19, no. 112. Greece: 1965
Anderson, J. R.The behavior and ecology of various flies associated with poultry ranches in northern California. Proc. Calif. Mosquito Control Assoc., 32 (1964), 30–4Google Scholar
Celedova, C., Prokesova, N., Havlik, B., and Muller, O.. Demonstration of migration of Musca domestica from pig sheds into human dwellings. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microb. Immun., 7 (1963), 360–70Google ScholarPubMed
Dipeolu, O. O.The biting flies in the zoo of the University of Ibadan. E. Afr. Wildl. J., 14 (1976), 229–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ek-bom, B., M. E. Erwin, and Y. Robert. Interchanges of Insects Between Agricultural and Surrounding Landscapes. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2000
Green, A. A.The control of blowflies infesting slaughter houses. I. Field observations of the habits of blowflies. Ann. Appl. Biol., 38 (1951), 475–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, B. and Bornstein, A. A.. Fly dispersion from a rural Mexican slaughter house. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 13 (1964), 881–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. D., Thomas, G. D., and Morgan, C. E.. Stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) breeding in large round hay bales: initial associations (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 55 (1982), 617–20Google Scholar
Hanec, W.A study of the environmental factors affecting the dispersion of house flies (Musca domestica L.) in a dairy community near Fort Whyte, Manitoba. Can. Entomol., 88 (1956), 270–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulley, P. E.Factors affecting numbers of Musca domestica Linneaus (Diptera: Muscidae) and some other flies breeding in poultry manure. J. Entomol. Soc. South Afr., 49 (1986), 19–27Google Scholar
Schoof, H. F., Mail, G. A., and Savage, E. P.. Fly production sources in urban communities. J. Econ. Entomol., 47 (1954), 245–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoda, S. R., Thomas, G. D., and Campbell, J. B.. Developmental sites and relative abundance of immature stages of the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) in beef cattle feedlot pens in eastern Nebraska. J. Econ. Entomol., 84 (1991), 191–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafford, K. C. and D. E. Bay. Dispersion pattern and association of house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), larvae and both sexes of Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acari: Macrochelidae) in response to poultry manure moisture, temperature, and accumulation. Environ. Entomol., 16 (1987), 159–64CrossRef
Anginao, E. E., Magnuson, L. M., and Stewart, G. F.. Effects of urbanisation on storm water runoff quality: a limited experiment, Naismith Ditch, Lawrence, Kansas. Water Resources Res., 8 (1972), 135–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. N. K.Urbanization and the diversity of insects. Biol. Conserv., 10 (1978), 249–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detwyler, T. R. and M. G. Marcus. Urbanization and Environment: The Physical Geography of the City. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1972
Duckworth, F. S. and Sandberg, J. S.. The effect of cities on horizontal and vertical temperature gradients. Bull. Am. Meterol. Soc., 35 (1954), 198–207Google Scholar
Extence, C. A.The effect of motorway construction on an urban stream. Environ. Pollut., 17 (1978), 245–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faeth, S. H. and Kane, T. C.. Urban biogeography: city parks as islands for Diptera and Coleoptera. Oecologia, 32 (1962), 127–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. H.Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology, 57 (1976), 141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, B. M.The problem of urban dogs. Science, 185 (1974), 903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. and P. Bonnett. Nature in the Urban Landscape. A Study of City Ecosystems. Baltimore, MD: York, 1973
Hogg, I. D. and Norris, R. H.. Effects of run-off from land clearing and urban development on the distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates in pool areas of a river. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Biol., 42 (1991), 507–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, H. E. Climates and urban planning. In Urban Climates. World Meterological Association no. 254. Technical paper 141, note 108, pp. 364–74. Geneva: World Meterological Association, 1970
Legner, E. F. and Olton, G. S.. Distribution and relative abundance of dipterous pupae and their parasitoids in accumulations of domestic animal manure in the southwestern United States. Hilgardia, 40 (1971), 505–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lussenhop, J.The soil arthropod community of a Chicago expressway margin. Ecology 54 (1973), 1124–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsome, E. M.Arthropod problems in recreation areas. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 22 (1977), 333–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. and Owen, D. F.. Suburban gardens: England's most important nature reserve. Environ. Conserv., 2 (1975), 53–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, F.Urban ecology today. Science 170 (1970), 1006–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streu, H. T.The turfgrass ecosystem: impact of pesticides. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 19 (1973), 89–91Google Scholar
Surtees, G.Urbanization and the epidemiology of mosquito-borne diseases. Abstr. Hyg., 46 (1971), 121–34Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Biozönotische Untersuchungen an Ruderalstellen. Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 81 (1952), 122–74Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Untersuchungen über das Hypolithion einer Hausterrasse. Pedobiologia, 6 (1966), 12–36Google Scholar
Tischler, W.Ecology of arthropod fauna in man-made habitats: the problem of synanthropy. Zool. Anz., 191 (1973), 157–61Google Scholar
Wilton, D. P.Dog excrement as a factor in community fly problems. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc., 18 (1963), 311–17Google Scholar
Woodroffe, G. E.The biological origin of our domestic insect pests. Biol. Hum. Aff., 18 (1952), 1–5Google Scholar
Zuska, J. and Lastovka, P.. Species-composition of the dipterous fauna in various types of food-processing plants in Czechoslovakia. Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov., 66 (1969), 201–21Google Scholar
Back, E. A.Gryllus domesticus L. and city dumps. J. Econ. Entomol., 29 (1936), 198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, C. J. Trends in urban refuse disposal: a pest's perspective. In Robinson, W. H., F. Rettich, and G. W. Rambo (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests, pp. 83–99. Hronov, Czech Republic: Grafické Závody, 1999
Bowerman, A. G. and Redente, E. F.. Biointrusion of protective barriers at hazardous waste sites. J. Environ. Qual., 27 (1988), 625–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calisir, B. and Polat, E.. An investigation into the fly fauna of five refuse tips in Istanbul. Turkiye Parazitoliji Dergisi, 17 (1993), 119–29Google Scholar
Campbell, E. and Black, R. J.. The problems of migration of mature fly larvae from refuse containers and its implication on the frequency of refuse collection. Calif. Vec. Views, 7 (1960), 9–16Google Scholar
Crawford, R. L.Autumn populations of spiders and other arthropods in an urban landfill. Northwest Sci., 53 (1979), 51–3Google Scholar
Darlington, A. Ecology of Refuse Tips. London: Heineman Educational Books, 1969
Deonier, C. C.Insect pests breeding in vegetable refuse in Arizona. J. Econ. Entomol., 35 (1972), 457–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirlbek, K. Species, daily frequency and succession of Diptera on refuse depositions of communal waste in Prague. In Kluzak, Z. (ed.) Dipterologica Bohemoslovaka IV. Sbornik referatuz VIII celostatniho dipterologiceho seminare v Ceskych Budejovicich, pp. 109–11. Ceske Budejovice, Czechoslovakia: Jihoceske Muzeum, 1986
Feachem, R. G., D. J. Bradley, H. Garelick, and D. Duncan Mara (eds.) Sanitation and Disease: Health Aspects of Excreta and Wastewater Management. Chichester: John Wiley, 1983
Ilgaz, A., Ozgur, Y., Ak, S., Turan, N., and Gun, H.. Isolation and identification of bacteria from flies collected from garbage in Istanbul, and their effect on human health. Turk. J. Infect., 9 (1995), 131–6Google Scholar
Imai, C.Population dynamics of houseflies, Musca domestica, on experimentally accumulated refuse. Res. Popul. Ecol., 26 (1984), 353–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. Influence of the refuse dump biotopes on ecology of some gamasoid mites and ticks. Modern acarology. In Dusbabek, F. and V. Bukva (eds.), vol. I. Proceedings of the VIII International Congress of Acarology, vol. I. The Hague, Netherlands: Academic, 1991
Magy, H. I. and Black, R. J.. An evaluation of the migration of fly larvae from garbage cans in Pasadena, California. Calif. Vector Views, 9 (1962), 55–9Google Scholar
Nuorteva, P., Kotimaa, T., Pohjolainen, L., and Räsänen, T.. Blowflies (Dipt., Calliphoridae) on the refuse depot of the city of Kuopio in Central Finland. Ann. Entomol. Fenn., 30 (1964), 94–104Google Scholar
Nuorteva, P., Kolehmainen, K. M., Korhonen, K. M., et al. The dimensions of nuisance caused by city garbage dumps to people living in their vicinity. Ymparisto ja Terveys, 11 (1980), 33–7Google Scholar
Quarterman, K. D., Baker, W. C., and Jensen, J. A.. The importance of sanitation in municipal fly control. Am. J. Trop. Med., 29 (1949), 973–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, W. and Haschemi, H.. Dispersal and emigration of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus (L.) (Ensifera, Gryllidae) and the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea, Blattellidae), of a rubbish tip. Z. Ang. Zoo., 80 (1994), 249–58Google Scholar
Strazdine, V.Anthropogenic impact on insect larvae. Complexes of insect larvae and their succession in composted municipal solid garbage. Ekologiya, 2 (1996), 48–58Google Scholar
Süss, L., S. Cassani, B. Serra, and M. Caimi. Integrated pest management for control of the house fly Musca domestica (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) in an urban solid waste treatment plant. In Robinson, W. H., F. Rettich, and G. W. Rambo (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Urban Pests, pp. 261–9. Hronov, Czech Republic: Grafické Závody, 1999
Toyama, G. M.A preliminary survey of fly breeding at sanitary landfills in Hawaii with an evaluation of landfill practices and their effect on fly breeding. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc., 28 (1988), 49–56Google Scholar
Walden, B. H.Abundance of the German roach in a city dump, Blattella germanica Linn. Conn. Agr. Stat. Bull., 234 (1922), 188–9Google Scholar
Williams, P. T. Waste Treatment and Disposal. London: John Wiley, 1998
Wilton, D. P.Refuse containers as a source of flies in Honolulu and nearby communities. Proc. Hawaiian Entom. Soc., 17 (1961), 477–81Google Scholar
Abrams, C. Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1964
Back, K. W. Slums, Projects and People, Puerto Rico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1962
Kleevens, J. W. L.Housing, urbanization and health in developing (tropical) countries. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. Suppl., 77 (1971), 60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majzlan, O. and Holecova, M.. Anthropocoenoses of an orchard ecosystem in urban agglomerations. Ekologia (Bratislava) 12 (1993), 121–9Google Scholar
Ragheb, I. Patterns of urban growth in the Middle East. In Breese, G. (ed.) The City in Developing Countries: Readings on Urbanism and Urbanization. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1969
Samaj, B. S. Slums of Old Delhi. Delhi: Atma Ram, 1958
Turner, J. C. Limas Barriadas and Corralones: Suburbs vs. Slums. Ekistics, vol. 19, no. 112. Greece: 1965
Anderson, J. R.The behavior and ecology of various flies associated with poultry ranches in northern California. Proc. Calif. Mosquito Control Assoc., 32 (1964), 30–4Google Scholar
Celedova, C., Prokesova, N., Havlik, B., and Muller, O.. Demonstration of migration of Musca domestica from pig sheds into human dwellings. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microb. Immun., 7 (1963), 360–70Google ScholarPubMed
Dipeolu, O. O.The biting flies in the zoo of the University of Ibadan. E. Afr. Wildl. J., 14 (1976), 229–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ek-bom, B., M. E. Erwin, and Y. Robert. Interchanges of Insects Between Agricultural and Surrounding Landscapes. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2000
Green, A. A.The control of blowflies infesting slaughter houses. I. Field observations of the habits of blowflies. Ann. Appl. Biol., 38 (1951), 475–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, B. and Bornstein, A. A.. Fly dispersion from a rural Mexican slaughter house. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 13 (1964), 881–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. D., Thomas, G. D., and Morgan, C. E.. Stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) breeding in large round hay bales: initial associations (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 55 (1982), 617–20Google Scholar
Hanec, W.A study of the environmental factors affecting the dispersion of house flies (Musca domestica L.) in a dairy community near Fort Whyte, Manitoba. Can. Entomol., 88 (1956), 270–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulley, P. E.Factors affecting numbers of Musca domestica Linneaus (Diptera: Muscidae) and some other flies breeding in poultry manure. J. Entomol. Soc. South Afr., 49 (1986), 19–27Google Scholar
Schoof, H. F., Mail, G. A., and Savage, E. P.. Fly production sources in urban communities. J. Econ. Entomol., 47 (1954), 245–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoda, S. R., Thomas, G. D., and Campbell, J. B.. Developmental sites and relative abundance of immature stages of the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) in beef cattle feedlot pens in eastern Nebraska. J. Econ. Entomol., 84 (1991), 191–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafford, K. C. and D. E. Bay. Dispersion pattern and association of house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), larvae and both sexes of Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acari: Macrochelidae) in response to poultry manure moisture, temperature, and accumulation. Environ. Entomol., 16 (1987), 159–64CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×