Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-hwk5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-03T04:09:04.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Professions allied to medicine and prescribing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

Eleanor Bradley  and
Peter Nolan
By
Alan Borthwick
Eleanor Bradley
Affiliation:
Staffordshire University
Peter Nolan
Affiliation:
Staffordshire University
Alan Borthwick
Affiliation:
Lecturer School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

Although ‘prescribing’ by non-medically qualified allied health professionals may reasonably be regarded as a recent development in the UK, it is also the case that a small number – most notably podiatrists, optometrists and ambulance paramedics – already enjoy an established history in the legal access, supply, administration and sale of certain restricted medicines (Borthwick, 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003, 2004; Borthwick & Nancarrow 2005; Lawrenson, 2005; Titcomb & Lawrenson, 2006). Other allied health professions (AHPs), such as physiotherapy and radiography, developed formal, legal rights to the administration and supply of medicines over a more recent timeframe (Hogg & Hogg, 2006). Across the AHPs, the use of medicines varies; in some cases ‘generalist’ practitioners may enjoy legal rights to administer, sell and supply restricted medicines, while in other cases it is confined to small numbers working within highly specialised fields (CSP, 1999).

In this chapter, the podiatry, optometry and ambulance paramedical professions serve as useful case exemplars of what might be referred to as early AHP ‘prescribing’, in the sense of having secured independent, legally acknowledged rights to the access, supply and administration of specific ‘prescription only’ and ‘pharmacy only’ medicines some time prior to the availability of ‘patient group directions’ (PGDs) and ‘supplementary’ prescribing. Radiography and physiotherapy are included as examples of AHPs that acquired such rights under PGDs and supplementary prescribing. Indeed, within the AHPs there has been a variable degree of interest in pursuing rights to access and administer medicines.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Non-Medical Prescribing
Multidisciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 133 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, A. (1988) The System of Professions – An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adonis, A. (1993) Parliament Today. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Allarton, A. (2006) Cited in: Is education fit for purpose? News and Events, Frontline, 15 November 2006, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/ archiveissues (accessed on 11 April 2007).
Blake, A. (2005) A post-operative comparison of nail avulsion using phenol and cryotherapy. British Journal of Podiatry, 8, 128–32.Google Scholar
BMJ (1967a) Editorial: control of drugs. British Medical Journal, 16 September, pp. 689– 90.
BMJ (1967b) Proposed legislation on drugs. British Medical Journal, 16 September, p. 734.
Borthwick, A. M. (1997) A Study of the Professionalisation Strategies of British Podiatry 1960–1997. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2000) Challenging medicine: the case of podiatric surgery. Work, Employment and Society (Notes and Issues), 14(2), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2001a) Drug prescribing in podiatry: radicalism or tokenism? British Journal of Podiatry, 4, 56–64.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2001b) Predicting the impact of new prescribing rights. guest editorial. The Diabetic Foot, 4(1), 4–8.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2002) Attaining prescribing rights: miracle or mirage? editorial. Podiatry Now, 5, 158.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2003) Prescribing rights for the allied health professions: temporary lull or quiet abandonment? Podium, 1(4), 4–6.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2004) The politics of allied health prescribing: reflections on a new discourse, editorial. British Journal of Podiatry, 7, 31.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. (2005) ‘In the beginning’: local anaesthesia and the Croydon Postgraduate Group. British Journal of Podiatry, 8, 87–94.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. M. & Nancarrow, S. (2005) Promoting health: the role of the specialist podiatrist. In: Scriven, A. (ed), Health Promoting Practice – The Contribution of Nurses and Allied Health Professionals. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bowen, C. (2003) Podiatric Rheumatic Care Association. Podiatry Now, 6(6), 18.Google Scholar
Bradlow, J. & Coulter, A. (1993) Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing scheme on general practitioners' prescribing costs. British Medical Journal, 307, 1186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. & Masterson, A. (2003) Reconfiguring the clinical workforce. In: Davies, C. (ed), The Future Health Workforce. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Chiropodist (1980) State registered chiropodists: local analgesia. The Chiropodist, 35, 279.
CoR (1996) Role Development in Radiography. London: College of Radiographers.
CoR (2001) Prescribing by Radiographers: A Vision Paper. London: College of Radiographers.
CoR (2007) Course of Study for the Certification of Competence in Administering Intravenous Injections. London: College of Radiographers.
CSP (1999) A Clinical Guideline for the Use of Injection Therapy by Physical Therapists. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapists.
CSP (2003) Prescribing Rights for Physiotherapists. PA 58. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapists.
CSP (2005) Prescribing Rights for Physiotherapists; An Update. Chartered Society of Physiotherapists. London: CSP.
Cumming, S., Stewart, S., Harborne, D., Smith, J., Broom, H., Abbott, A. & Barton, A. (2005) A randomised controlled trial of phenol and sodium hydroxide in nail surgery. British Journal of Podiatry, 8, 123–7.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1994) Feet First – Report of the Joint Department of Health and NHS Chiropody Task Force. Department of Health 1085, 16M, 9/94. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (1999) Final Report of the Review of Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines (Crown Report). London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2000a) Patient Group Directions – Guidance on Group Directions. Health Service Circular, HSC2000/026 (England only). London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2000b) Patient Group Directions. Health Service Circular, NHS HDL (2001)7 (Scotland only). London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2000c) Patient Group Directions. Health Service Circular, WHC2000/16 (Wales only). London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2001) The NHS Plan – A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2005) Supplementary Prescribing by Nurses, Pharmacists, Chiropodists/ Podiatrists, Physiotherapists and Radiographers within the NHS in England. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2007a) Commissioning Toolkit for Community Based Eye Services. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (2007b) Patient Group Directions, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Emergencyplanning/DH_4069610 (accessed 23 April 2007).
Department of Health (2007c) Trust, Assurance and Safety – The Regulation of Health Professionals in the 21st Century. London: Department of Health.
Dickson, D. J. (1996) What do general practitioners expect from rheumatology clinics? British Journal of Rheumatology, 35, 920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, R. (2004) CEO Society of Radiographers, cited in Radiographers to receive prescription rights. Synergy News, June issue, p. 6.
Fournier, V. (2000) Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In: Malin, N. (ed), Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Francis, G. & Hogg, D. (2006) Radiographer prescribing: enhancing seamless care in oncology. Radiography, 12, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. (2006) Professional Officer, Society and College of Radiographers, cited in Work on radiographer prescribing gathers pace. Synergy News, June issue, p. 7.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1970a) Professional Dominance – The Social Structure of Medical Care. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1970b) Profession of Medicine – A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn – Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frontline (2004) CSP continues to push for prescribing rights for physio. London: CSP, 15 September 2004, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/archiveissues.cfm.
Gabe, J.Kelleher, D. & Williams, G. (1994) Challenging Medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ham, C. (1994) Management and Competition in the New NHS. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press.Google Scholar
Ham, C. (2002) Health Policy in Britain, 5th edn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Health Professions Council (2007) Register of Approved Course-Supplementary Prescribing, http://www.hpc-uk.org/aboutregistration/educationandtraining/ approvedcourses_sp/ (accessed on 28 May 2007).
Health and Social Care Act (2001) Part 5, Clause 68. The Stationery Office: London, 2001.
Hogg, P., Francis, G., Hogg, D., Mountain, V., Pitt, A., Sherrington, S. & Freeman, C. (2007) Prescription, supply and administration of medicines in radiography: current position and future directions. Synergy News, December 2007, 27–31.Google Scholar
Hogg, D. & Hogg, P. (2003) Guest editorial, Radiographer prescribing: lessons to be learnt from the community nursing experience. Radiography, 9, 263–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, P. & Hogg, D. (2006) Prescription, supply and administration of drugs in diagnosis and therapy. Synergy News, March issue, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
JBPM (1994) Forging ahead with prescription only medicines. Journal of British Podiatric Medicine, 49(1), 2.
Kerr, D. & Richardson, T. (2000) The diabetic foot at the crossroads: vanguard or oblivion? The Diabetic Foot, 3, 70–1.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, P. & Craig, A. (2006) 3SI or how to reduce radiotherapy waiting times. Synergy News, April issue, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
Larkin, G. V. (1979) Medical dominance and control: radiographers in the division of labour. Sociological Review, 26, 843–58.Google Scholar
Larkin, G. V. (1980) Professionalism, dentistry and public health. Social Science and Medicine, 14a, 223–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Larkin, G. V. (1981) Professional autonomy and the ophthalmic optician. Sociology of Health and Illness, 3(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, G. V. (1983) Occupational Monopoly and Medicine. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Larkin, G. V. (1988) Medical dominance in Britain – image and historical reality. Millbank Quarterly 66(Suppl 3), 117–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larkin, G. V. (1993) Continuity in change: medical dominance in the United Kingdom. In: Hafferty, F. & McKinlay, J. (eds), The Changing Medical Profession: An International Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larkin, G. V. (1995) State control and the health professions in the United Kingdom: historical perspectives. In: Johnson, T.,Larkin, G. & Saks, M. (eds), Health Professions and the State in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawrenson, J. G. (2005) Recent changes in the use and supply of medicines by optometrists. Optometry Today, 3 June, pp. 28–32.
Lawrenson, J. G. (2007) Academic Committee and Research Sub-Committee, College of Optometrists, telephone interview, 19 April 2007.
Limb, M. (2005) Blurring boundaries. Frontline, News and Events, 1 September 2005, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/archiveissues (accessed 11 April 2007).
Limb, M. (2006) Supplementary question. Frontline, News and Events, 16 August 2006a, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/archiveissues (accessed 11 April 2007).
Malin, N., Wilmot, S. & Manthorpe, J. (2002) Key Concepts and Debates in Health and Social Policy. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McCartney, W.,Tyrer, S.,Brazier, M. & Prayle, D. (1999) Nurse prescribing: radicalism or tokenism? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 348–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McInnes, A. (2002) Are podiatrists qualified for the job? The Diabetic Foot, 5, 62–7.Google Scholar
Medicines Act (1968) London: The Stationery Office.
MHRA (2003) Sale, Supply and Administration of Medicines by Allied Health Professionals under Patient Group Directions, MLX294. London: Medicines and Helthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
MHRA (2004) Proposals for the Amendments to the Range of Medicines Which Can Be Sold, Supplied or Administered by Optometrists, MLX306. London: Medicines and Healthare Products Regulatory Agency.
MHRA (2006) Medicines for Human Use (Administration and Sale or Supply) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2006, Statutory Instrument 2006 No. 2807. London: The Stationery Office.
Needle, J., Lawrenson, J. G. & Petchley, R. (2007) Scope of Therapeutic Practice: A Survey of UK Optometrists: A Report Prepared for the College of Optometrists. London: City University London.Google Scholar
The Opticians Act (1958), London: HMSO.
Oxlade, L. (2006) Is education fit for practice? Frontline News and Events, 1 November 2006, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/archiveissues (accessed 11 April 2007).
Robinson, P. (2004) Cited in CSP continues to push for prescribing rights for physios. Frontline, News and Events, 15 September 2004, http://www.csp.org.uk/director/newsandevents/frontline/archiveissues (accessed 11 April 2007).
SCoR (2002) Submission Document in Response to Review of Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines (Crown II) Final Report. March 1999 (including appendices A and B). London: Society and College of Radiographers.
SCP (2004) Minutes of meeting of medicines committee. London: Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 5 February.
SCP (2006a) Podiatry Medicines Access and Supply Updated Pharmacology Syllabus. London: Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists.
SCP (2006b), Minutes of meeting of medicines committee. London: Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 19 January.
SCP (2006c) Minutes of meeting of medicines committee. London: Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 6 September.
SCP (2007) Minutes of meeting of medicines committee. London: Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 21 February.
Shepherd, J. (2000) Changes in roles and responsibilities: a personal view. Synergy News, March issue, p. 20.Google Scholar
Synergy News (2003) First therapy consultant says role is a major advance. Synergy News, October issue, p. 3.
Synergy News (2004) Radiographers to receive prescription rights. Synergy News, June issue, p. 6.
Synergy News (2006a) Radiographer prescribing of medicines. Synergy News, November issue, p. 11.
Synergy News (2006b) Trainee therapy consultant looks forward to a successful career. Synergy News, February issue, p. 9.
Taylor, R. S. (1999) Partnerships or power struggles? The crown review of prescribing. British Journal of General Practice, 49, 340–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Timmons, S. & Tanner, J. (2004) A disputed occupational boundary: operating theatre nurses and operating department practitioners. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 645–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titcomb, L. C. & Lawrenson, J. G. (2006) Recent changes in medicines legislation that affect optometrists. Optometry in Practice, 7, 23–34.Google Scholar
Webster, C. (2002) The National Health Service: A Political History, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, M. (2002) When Is a Diabetic Specialist Not a DSP? The Diabetic Foot, 5(2), 5–7.Google Scholar
Young, M. (2003) Generalists, specialists and super-specialists. The Diabetic Foot, 6(1), 6.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×