Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T20:56:01.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Is There a Hedonic Dimension to Odors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2009

By
Catherine Rouby  and
Moustafa Bensafi
Edited by
Catherine Rouby ,
Benoist Schaal ,
Danièle Dubois ,
Rémi Gervais  and
A. Holley
Catherine Rouby
Affiliation:
Associate professor of neuroscience, Université Claude Bernard
Moustafa Bensafi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon, Cedex 07, France
Catherine Rouby
Affiliation:
Université Lyon I
Benoist Schaal
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Danièle Dubois
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Rémi Gervais
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
A. Holley
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

The goal of psychophysics is to understand the relationships between variations in the physical environment and variations in our mental states. During the past century, psychophysics has evolved from pure sensory and physicalist conceptions to more perceptive and ecological ones, allowing us to include decision, attention, and expectation in the processing of sensory stimuli (Tiberghien, 1984). In the olfactory domain, memory psychophysics has been compared to perception psychophysics (Algom and Cain, 1991), and multidimensional scaling methods have been used to compare perception and imagery (Carrasco and Ridout, 1993). Thus, psychophysics has come to include more and more cognitive issues. Perception is recognized as categorical, inferential, and generic, leading to meaning and knowledge.

Hedonic responses to odors are very salient in folk psychology (David, Dubois, and Rouby, 2000) as well as in scientific accounts (see Rouby and Sicard, 1997, for a review). But can we study hedonic responses to odors with the usual psychophysical tools? Empirical descriptions and measures of preferences are clearly possible (Moncrieff, 1966; Köster, 1975), allowing a kind of affective psychophysics. But beyond preferences, if one is interested in the links between emotional responses and cognitive processing of odors, methodological questions arise concerning what is measured and how. Three main questions will be examined in this chapter:

  1. Are the degree of pleasantness and the intensity of an odor reflecting the same dimension?

  2. Is there a hedonic axis? Is a representation of affect possible on a psychophysical continuum, or are there clear-cut odor categories?

  3. Are unpleasant odors symmetric with pleasant odors in relation to “zero affect”? That is, do they carry the same weight with respect to a neutral reference?

Type
Chapter
Information
Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition , pp. 140 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggleton J P (1992). The Amygdala. Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory and Mental Dysfunction. New York: Wiley-Liss
, Alaoui-Ismaïli O, , Robin O, , Rada H, , Dittmar A, & , Vernet-Maury E (1997a). Basic Emotions Evoked by Odorants: Comparison between Autonomic Reponses and Self-evaluation. Physiology and Behavior 62:713–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Alaoui-Ismaïli O, , Vernet-Maury E, , Dittmar A, , Delhomme G, & , Chanel J (1997b). Odor Hedonics: Connection with Emotional Response Estimated by Autonomic Parameters. Chemical Senses 22:237–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Algom D & , Cain W S (1991). Remembered Odors and Mental Mixtures: Tapping Reservoirs of Olfactory Knowledge. Journal of Experimental. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17:1104–19Google Scholar
, Armony J L, , Servan-Schreiber D, , Cohen J D, & , LeDoux J (1997). Computational Modeling of Emotion: Explorations through the Anatomy and Physiology of Fear Conditioning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ayabe-Kanamura S, , Schicker I, , Laska M, , Hudson R, , Distel H, , Kobayakawa T, & , Saito S (1998). Differences in Perception of Everyday Odors: A Japanese-German Cross-Cultural Study. Chemical Senses 23:31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Bensafi M, , Rouby C, , Farget V, , Vigouroux M, & , Holley A (2001). Are Pleasant and Unpleasant Odors Processed in the Same Way?Chemical Senses 26:786Google Scholar
, Berglund B, , Berglund U, , Engen T, & , Ekman G (1973). Multidimensional Analysis of Twenty-one Odors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 14:131–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Berthoz A & , Viaud-Delmon I (1999). Multisensory Integration in Spatial Orientation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9:708–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisson C (1997). La dénomination des odeurs: variations et régularités linguistiques. In: Olfaction: Du Linguistique au Neurone, ed. D Dubois & A Holley. Intellectica 1(24):29–49
, Brauchli P, , Rüegg P B, , Etzweiler F, & , Zeier H (1995). Electrocortical and Autonomic Alteration by Administration of a Pleasant and an Unpleasant Odor. Chemical Senses 20:505–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck C D (1949). A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages, A Contribution to the History of Ideas. University of Chicago Press
Burnet R, Dubois D, & Rouby C (1997). Pleasantness of Odors: Perceptual or/and Semantic Processing? In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. M G Shafto & P Langley, p. 878. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
, Carrasco M & , Ridout J B (1993). Olfactory Perception and Olfactory Imagery: A Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19:287–301Google Scholar
, Craik F I M & , Lockhart R S (1972). Levels of Processing: A Framework of Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11:671–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Craik F I M & , Tulving E (1975). Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104:268–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio A R (1994). Descarte's Error: Emotion, Reason and Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam
David S, Dubois D, & Rouby C (2000). Lexical Devices and the Construction of Objects: A Comparison between Sensory Modes. In: LACUS Forum XXVI, The Lexicon, ed. Linguistic Association of Canada and United States, pp. 225–35. Fullerton, CA: LACUS
David S, Dubois D, Rouby C, & Schaal B (1997). L'expression des odeurs en français: analyse lexicale et représentation cognitive. In: Olfaction: Du Linguistique au Neurone, ed. D Dubois & A Holley. Intellectica 1(24):51–83
, Davidson R J & , Irwin W (1999). The Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion and Affective Style. Trends in Cognitive Science 3:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Graaf C, , Staveren W, & , Burema J (1996). Psychophysical and Psychohedonic Functions of Four Common Flavors in Elderly Subjects. Chemical Senses 21:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Distel H, , Ayabe-Kanamura S, , Martinez-Gomez M, , Schicker I, , Kobayakawa T, , Saito S, & , Hudson R (1999). Perception of Everyday Odors – Correlation between Intensity, Familiarity, and Strength of Hedonic Judgment. Chemical Senses 24:191–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Doty R L (1975). An Examination of the Relationships between the Pleasantness, Intensity, and Concentration of 10 Odorous Stimuli. Perception and Psychophyics 17:492–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ehrlichman H, , Brown S, , Zhu J, & , Warrenburg S (1995). Startle Reflex Modulation during Exposure to Pleasant and Unpleasant Odors. Psychophysiology 32:150–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ehrlichman H, , Brown-Kuhl S, , Zhu J, & , Warrenburg S (1997). Startle Reflex Modulation during Exposure to Pleasant and Unpleasant Odors in a Between Subjects Design. Psychophysiology 34:726–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Eichenbaum H, , Morton T H, , Potter H, & , Corkin S (1983). Selective Olfactory Deficits in Case H. M. Brain 106:459–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ekman P, , Levenson R W, & , Friesen W V (1983). Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes among Emotions. Science 221:1208–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Engen T & , Ross B M (1973). Long-Term Memory of Odors with and without Verbal Descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 99:222–5Google Scholar
, Fulbright R K, , Skudlarski P, , Lacadie C M, , Warrenburg S, , Bowers A A, , Gore J C, & , Wexler B E (1998). Functional MR Imaging of Regional Brain Responses to Pleasant and Unpleasant Odors. American Journal of Neuroradiology 19:1721–6Google Scholar
, Gilbert A N, , Fridlund A J & , Sabini J (1987). Hedonic and Social Determinants of Facial Displays to Odors. Chemical Senses 12:355–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godinot N (1999). Contribution à l'étude de la perception olfactive: qualité des odeurs et mélanges de composés odorants. Doctoral dissertation, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1
Halgren E (1992). Emotional Neurophysiology of the Amygdala within the Context of Human Cognition. In: The Amygdala. Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory and Mental Dysfunction, ed. J P Aggleton, pp. 191–228. New York: Wiley-Liss
, Harper R, , Land D G, , Griffiths N M, & , Bate-Smith E C (1966). Odour Qualities: A Glossary of Usage. British Journal of Psychology 59:231–52Google Scholar
, Henion K E (1971). Odor Pleasantness and Intensity: A Single Dimension?Journal of Experimental Psychology 90:275–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hermann C, , Ziegler S, , Birnbaumer N, & , Flor H (2000). Pavlovian Aversive and Appetitive Odor Conditioning in Humans: Subjective, Peripheral and Electrocortical Changes. Experimental Brain Research 132:203–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Herz R S, , McCall C, & , Cahill L (1999). Hemispheric Lateralization in the Processing of Odor Pleasantness versus Odor Names. Chemical Senses 24:691–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hombert J M (1992). Terminologie des odeurs dans quelques langues du Gabon. Pholia 7:61–5Google Scholar
, Isen A M & , Daubman K A (1984). The Influence of Affect on Categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47:1206–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Kobal G, , Hummel T, & , Toller S (1992). Differences in Human Chemosensory Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Chemical Stimuli Presented to Left and Right Nostrils. Chemical Senses 17:233–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köster E P (1975). Human Psychophysics in Olfaction. In: Methods in Olfactory Research, ed. D G Moulton, A Turk, & J W Johnston, Jr, pp. 345–74. New York: Academic Press
Linnaeus C (1765). Odores medicamentorum. Amoenitates Academicae, vol. 3, pp. 183–201. Stockholm: LarsSalvius
, Miltner W, , Matjak M, , Braun C, , Diekmann H, & , Brody S (1994). Emotional Qualities of Odors and Their Influence on the Startle Reflex in Humans. Psychophysiology 31:107–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrieff R W (1966). Odour Preferences. New York: Wiley
, Morris J S, , Frith C D, , Perrett D I, , Rowland D, , Young A W, , Calder A J, & , Dolan R J (1996). A Differential Neural Response in the Human Amygdala to Fearful and Happy Facial Expressions. Nature 383:812–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouélé M (1997). L'apprentissage des odeurs chez les Waanzi: note de recherche. In: L'odorat chez l'Enfant: Perspectives Croisées, ed. B Schaal, Enfance 1:209–22CrossRef
, Mouélé M, , Hombert J M, , Dubois D, , Schaal B, , Rouby C, & , Sicard G (1997). Specific Odor Terminology: The Case of Li Wanzi (a Bantu Language of Central Africa). Chemical Senses 20:78Google Scholar
, Niedenthal P M, , Halberstadt J B, & , Innes-Ker A H (1999). Emotional Response Categorization. Psychological Review 106:337–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Otto T, , Cousens G, & , Herzog C (2000). Behavioral and Neuropsychological Foundations of Olfactory Fear Conditioning. Behavioural Brain Reasearch 110:119–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parducci A (1995). Happiness, Pleasure and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Rolls E (1999). The Brain and Emotion. Oxford University Press
Rosch E (1996). The Environment of Minds: Towards a Noetic and Hedonic Ecology. In: Cognitive Ecology, ed. P M Friedman & E C Carterette, pp. 9–43. Orlando: Academic PressCrossRef
Rouby C, Jones-Gotman M, & Zatorre R (in press). Pleasantness and Intensity of Odors: Can They Be Dissociated?
Rouby C & Sicard G (1997). Des catégories d'odeurs? In: Catégorisation et Cognition, de la perception au discours, ed. D Dubois, pp. 59–81. Paris: Kimé
, Royet J P, , Koenig O, , Gregoire M C, , Cinotti L, , Lavenne F, , Bars D, , Costes N, , Vigouroux M, , Farget V, , Sicard G, , Holley A, , Mauguière F, , Comar D, & , Froment J C (1999). Functional Anatomy of Perceptual and Semantic Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11:94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Royet J P, , Zald D, , Versace R, , Costes N, , Lavenne F, , Koenig O, & , Gervais R (2000). Emotional Responses to Pleasant and Unpleasant Olfactory, Visual And Auditory Stimuli: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. Journal of Neuroscience 20:7752–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Rozin P & , Vollmecke T A (1986). Food Likes and Dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition 6:443–56Google Scholar
, Savic I & , Gulyas B (2000). PET Shows that Odors Are Processed both Ipsilaterally and Contralaterally to the Stimulated Nostril. Neuroreport 11:2861–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaal B, Rouby C, Marlier L, Soussignan R, & Tremblay R E (1998). Variabilité et universaux de l'espace perçu des odeurs: approches inter-culturelles de l'hédonisme olfactif. In: Géographie des odeurs, ed. R Dulau & J R Pitte, pp. 25–47. Paris: L'Harmattan
, Schiffman S S (1974). Physicochemical Correlates of Olfactory Quality. Science 185:112–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Schiffman S S, , Robinson D, & , Erickson R P (1977). Multidimensional Scaling of Odorants: Examination of Psychological and Physiological Dimensions. Chemical Senses 2:375–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Soussignan R, , Schaal B, , Marlier L, & , Jiang T (1997). Facial and Autonomic Responses to Biological and Artificial Olfactory Stimuli in Human Neonates: Re-examining Early Hedonic Discrimination of Odors. Physiology and Behavior 62:745–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner J E (1979). Human Facial Expressions in Response to Taste and Smell Stimulations. In: Advances in Child Development, vol. 13, ed. L P Lipsitt & H W Reese, pp. 257–95. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Tiberghien G (1984). Initiation à la psychophysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
, Tversky A & , Kahneman D (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211:453–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Haller A (1763). Liber XIV. Olfactus. Elementa Physiologiae Corporis Humani, Tome 5, pp. 125–85, Lausanne: Grasset
, Zald D H & , Pardo J V (1997). Emotion, Olfaction, and the Human Amygdala: Amygdala Activation during Aversive Olfactory Stimulation. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94:4119–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Zatorre R, , Jones-Gotman M, & , Rouby C (2000). Neural Mechanisms Involved in Odor Pleasantness and Intensity Judgments. Neuroreport 11:2711–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaardemaker H (1925). L'odorat. Paris: Doin

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Is There a Hedonic Dimension to Odors?
    • By Catherine Rouby, Associate professor of neuroscience, Université Claude Bernard, Moustafa Bensafi, Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon, Cedex 07, France
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Is There a Hedonic Dimension to Odors?
    • By Catherine Rouby, Associate professor of neuroscience, Université Claude Bernard, Moustafa Bensafi, Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon, Cedex 07, France
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Is There a Hedonic Dimension to Odors?
    • By Catherine Rouby, Associate professor of neuroscience, Université Claude Bernard, Moustafa Bensafi, Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon, Cedex 07, France
  • Edited by Catherine Rouby, Université Lyon I, Benoist Schaal, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Danièle Dubois, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, Rémi Gervais, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, A. Holley, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
  • Book: Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition
  • Online publication: 21 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.015
Available formats
×