Births: final data for 1997. National Vital Statistics Report 1999; 47:99–120.

Reempts, P J, Acker, K J. Ethical aspects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in premature infants: where do we stand? Resuscitation 2001; 51:225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloch, H. Abandonment, infanticide, and feticide. An overview of inhumanity to children. Am J Dis Child 1988; 142:1058–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boswell, J. The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance. New York: Pantheon; 1989.Google Scholar

Lecky, W. History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne. Vol. 2. New York: Brazillier; 1955:25–26.Google Scholar

Langer, W L. Europe's initial population explosion. Am Hist Rev 1963; 69:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selection from the Hippocratic Corpus. The Art (circa 5th–4th century BC). In: Reiser, S J, Dyck, A J, Curran, W J, eds. Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977:6–7.Google Scholar

Plato, . The Republic. Translated by Grube GMA. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing; 1974:42.Google Scholar

Alexander, G R, Slay, M. Prematurity at birth: trends, racial disparities, and epidemiology. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 215–220.Google ScholarPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infant mortality low birth weight among black and white infants – United States, 1980–2000. MMWR 2002; 51:589–592.

Guyer, B, Hoyert, D L, Martin, J. Annual summary of vital statistics – 1998. Pediatrics 1999; 104:1229–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eichenwald, E C, Stark, A R. High frequency ventilation: current status. Pediatr Rev 1999; 20:e127–e133.Google ScholarPubMed

Ballard, P L. Scientific rationale for the use of antenatal glucocorticoids to promote fetal development. Pediatr Rev 2000; 1:e83–e90.Google ScholarPubMed

Curley, A E, Halliday, H L. The present status of exogenous surfactant for the newborn. Early Hum Dev 2001; 61:67–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thorp, J M, Hartmann, K E, Berkman, J D. Antibiotic therapy for the treatment of preterm labor. A review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iams, J D, Mercer, B M. What we have learned about antenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27:247–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murphy, S L. Deaths: final data for 1998. National Vital Statistics Reports 2000: 48:87.Google ScholarPubMed

Branum, A M, Schoendorf, K C. Changing patterns of low birth weight and preterm birth in the United States, 1981–1998. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002: 16:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, D J, Levene, M I. Evidence of selection bias in preterm survival studies: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84:F79–F84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allen, M C. Preterm outcomes research: a critical component of neonatal intensive care. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 8:221–233.Google ScholarPubMed

El-Metwally, D, Vohr, B, Tucker, R. Survival and neonatal morbidity at the limits of viability in the mid 1990's. J Pediatr 2000: 137:612–622.Google Scholar

Lorenz, J M, Paneth, N, Jetton, J R, Ouden, L, Tyson, J E. Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001; 108:1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferrara, T B, Hoekstra, R E, Couser, R J. Survival and follow up of infants born at 23 to 26 weeks of gestational age: effects of surfactant therapy. J Pediatr 1994; 124:119–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hack, M, Friedman, H, Fanaroff, A. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996; 98:931–937.Google ScholarPubMed

The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Improved outcome into the 1990s for infants weighing 500–999g at birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997: 77:F91–F94.CrossRef

Hack, M, Fanaroff, A. Outcomes of children of extremely low birth weight and gestational age in the 1990s. Early Hum Dev 1999: 53:193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, P H, Jones, P, O'Callaghan, M J. Maternal antecedents for cerebral palsy in extremely preterm babies: a case controlled study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43:580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horbar, J D, Badger, G J, Carpenter, J H. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999. Pediatrics 2002: 110:143–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorenz, J M. Survival of the extremely preterm infant in North America in the 1990s. Clin Perinatol 2000: 27:255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tyson, J E, Younes, N, Verter, J, Wright, L L. Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501–800g birth weight. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. JAMA 1996; 276:1645–1651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorenz, J M. Management decisions in extremely premature infants. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8:475–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hack, M, Wright, L L, Shanbaran, S. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network, November 1989 to October 1990. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996: 172:457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauve, R S, Robertson, C, Etches, P, Byrne, P J, Dayer-Zamora, V. Before viability: a geographically based outcome study of infants 500grams or less at birth. Pediatrics 1998; 101:438–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chan, K, Ohlsson, A, Synnes, A, Lee, D S C, Chien, L, Lee, S K. Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks gestational age or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:220–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Effer, S B, Moutquin, J-M, Farine, D, Saigal, S, Nimrod, C, Kelly, E, Nigorsenga, J. Neonatal survival rates in 860 singleton live births at 24 and 25 weeks gestational age. A Canadian multicenter study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109:740–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Committee of Newborn Infant, Japan Society of Pediatrics. Neonatal white paper in Japan. J Jpn Pediatr Soc 1986; 90:2827–2855.

Committee of Newborn Infant, Japan Society of Pediatrics. Report on the current status of NICU and neonatal mortality in Japan. J Jpn Pediatr Soc 1991; 95:2454–2461.

Oishi, M, Nishida, H, Sasaki, T. Japanese experience with micropremies weighing less than 600 grams born between 1984 to 1993. Pediatrics 1997: 99:1–5.

Nishida, H. Perinatal care in Japan. J Perinatol 1997; 17:70–74.Google ScholarPubMed

Gultom, E, Doyle, L W, Davis, P, Dharmaluigam, A, Bowman, E. Changes over time in attitudes to treatment and survival rates for extremely preterm infants 23–27 weeks' gestational age. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 37:56–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doyle, L W, Gultom, E, Chuang, S L, James, M, Davis, P, Bowman, E. Changing mortality and causes of death in infants 23–27 weeks' gestational age. J Paediatr Child Hlth 1999; 35:255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wood, N S, Marlow, N, Costeloe, K, Gibson, A T, Wilkinson, A R, for the EPI Cure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:378–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayoubi, J M, Audibere, F, Boithas, C, Zupan, V, Taylor, S, Bosson, J L, Frydman, R. Perinatal factors affecting survival without disability of extremely premature infants at two years of age. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2002; 105:125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reuss, M L, Gordon, H R. Obstetrical judgments of viability and perinatal survival of extremely low birth weight infants. Am J Publ Hlth 1995; 85:362–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, R K, MacGregor, S N, Farrell, E E, Ragin, A, Davis, C, Sokol, M L. Perinatal factors influencing survival at 24 weeks gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:1724–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottoms, S F, Paul, R H, Iams, J D. Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean section on survival of extremely low birth weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:960–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bottoms, S F, Paul, R H, Mercer, B M. Antenatal predictors of neonatal survival and morbidity in extremely low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:665–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rennie, J M. Perinatal management at the margin of viability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 74:F214–F218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sims, D G, Heal, C A, Bartle, Sm. Use of adrenaline and atropine in neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1994; 70:F3–F9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sond, S, Glacois, P. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in very low birth weight infants. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9:130–133.Google Scholar

Davis, D J. How aggressive should delivery room CPR be for ELBW neonates? Pediatrics 1993; 92:447–450.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, P I, Wood, S, Bennett, J. Non-viable delivery at 20–23 weeks gestation: observations and signs of life after birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 83:F199–F202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jankov, R P, Asztalos, E V, Skidmore, M B. Favourable neurological outcomes following delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infants <750gs at birth. J Paediatr Child Hlth 2000; 36:19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doron, M W, Veness-Meehan, K A, Margolis, L H. Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 1998; 102:574–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finer, N N, Tarin, T, Vaucher, Y E, Barrington, K, Bejar, R. Intact survival in extremely low birth weight infants after delivery room resuscitation. Pediatrics 1999; 104:e40–e44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costeloe, K, Hennessy, E, Gibson, A T for the EPICure Study Group. The EPICure Study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold viability. Pediatrics 2000; 106:659–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heide, A, Maas, P J, Wal, G. Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands. Lancet 1997; 350:251–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Straughn, H K, Goldenberg, R L, Tolosa, J E. Birthweight-specific neonatal mortality in developing countries and obstetric practices. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003; 80:71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malhotra, D, Gopalan, S, Narang, A. Preterm breech delivery in a developing country. J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 45:27–34.Google Scholar

Morse, S B, Haywood, J L, Goldenberg, R L, Bornstein, J, Nelson, K G, Carlo, W A. Estimation of neonatal outcome and perinatal therapy use. Pediatrics 2000; 105:1046–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, L A, Watchko, J F. Decision making for the critically ill neonate near the end of life. J Perinatol 1996; 16:133–136.Google ScholarPubMed

Ginsberg, H G, Goldsmith, J P. Controversies in neonatal resuscitation. Clin Perinatol 1998; 25:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D E, Fleischman, A R. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18:117–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heywood, J L, Goldenberg, R L, Bronstein, J, Nelson, K G, Carlo, W A. Comparison of perceived and actual rates of survival and freedom from handicap in premature infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:432–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheldon, T. Dutch doctors change policy on treating preterm babies. Brit Med J 2001; 322:1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breborowicz, G H. Limits of fetal viability and its enhancement. Early Pregnancy 2001; 5:49–50.Google ScholarPubMed

Doyle, L W. Outcome at 5 years of age for children 23 to 27 weeks' gestation: refining the prognosis. Pediatrics 2001; 108:134–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal, S, Szatzmari, P, Rosenbaum, P, Campbell, D, King, S. Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: a regional study. J Pediatr 1991; 118:751–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Escobar, G J, Littenberg, B, Pettiti, D B. Outcome among surviving very low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 1991; 66:204–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Szatmari, P, Saigal, S, Rosenbaum, P, Campbell, D. Psychopathology and adaptive functioning among extremely low birth weight children at eight years of age. Dev Psychopathol 1993; 5:345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hille, E T M, Ouden, A L, Bauer, L, Oudenrijn, C, Brand, R, Verloore-Vanhorick, S P. School performance at nine years of age in very premature and low birth weight infants: perinatal risk factors and predictors at 5 years of age. J Pediatr 1994; 125:426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hack, M, Taylor, H G, Klein, N, Eiben, R, Schatschneider, C, Mercuri-Minich, N. School-age outcomes in children with birthweights under 750g. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:753–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hille, E T M, Den, Ouden A L, Saigal, S. Behavioural problems in children who weigh 1000g or less at birth in four countries. Lancet 2001: 357:1641–1643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal, S, Pinelli, J, Hoult, Kim M, Boyle, M. Psychopathology and social competencies of adolescents who were extremely low birth weights. Pediatrics 2003; 111:969–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saigal, S, Burrows, E, Stoskopf, B L, Rosenbaum, P L, Streiner, D L. Impact of extreme prematurity on families of adolescent children. J Pediatr 2000; 137:701–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Singer, L, Salvator, A, Guo, S, Collin, M, Lillien, M, Bailey, J. Maternal psychological distress and parenting stress after the birth of a very low birth weight infant. JAMA 1999; 281:799–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levy-Shiff, R, Einat, G, Mogilner, M B, Lerman, M, Krikler, R. Biological and environmental correlates of developmental outcome of prematurely born infants in early adolescence. J Pediatr Psychol 1994; 19:63–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gross, S J, Mettelbaum, B B, Dye, T D, Siagle, T A. Impact of family structure and stability on academic outcome in preterm children at 10 years of age. J Pediatr 2001; 138:169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inder, T, Huppi, P, Warfield, S. Periventricular white matter injury in the premature infant is followed by reduced cerebral cortical gray matter volume at term. Ann Neurol 1999: 46:755–760.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRef

Maalouf, E, Duggan, P, Rutherford, M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in a cohort of extremely preterm infants. J Pediatr 1999; 135:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, B S, Vohr, B, Staib, L H. Regional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants. JAMA 2000; 284:1939–1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ajayi-Obe, M, Saeed, N, Cowan, F M, Rutherford, M A, Edwards, A D. Reduced development of cerebral cortex in extremely preterm infants. Lancet 2000; 356:1162–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skranes, J, Nilson, G, Smevik, O, Vik, T, Brubakk, A. Cerebral MRI of very low birth weight children at 6 years of age compared with the findings at 1 year. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:471–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stewart, A L, Rifkin, L, Amess, P N. Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. Lancet 1999; 353:1653–1657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Isaacs, E B, Lucas, A, Chong, W K. Hippocompal volume and everyday memory in children of very low birth weight. Pediatr Res 2000; 47:713–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosarti, C., Al-Asady, M H S, Frangou, S, Stewart, A L, Rifkin, L, Murray, R M. Adolescents who were born very preterm have decreased brain volumes. Brain 2002; 125:1616–1623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peterson, B S, Anderson, A W, Ehrenkranz, R. Regional brain volumes and their later neurodevelopmental correlates in term and preterm infants. Pediatrics 2003; 111:939–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hack, M, Klein, N, Taylor, H G. Long term developmental outcomes of low birth weight infants. Future Child 1995; 5:176–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal, S, Den, Ouden L, Wolke, O. School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics 2003; 112:943–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, P, Doyle, L W, Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA 2003; 289:3264–3272.

Wolke, D, Ratschinski, G, Ohrt, B. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr 1994; 153:906–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morley, R, Farewell, V. Methodological issues in randomized controlled trials. Semin Neonatol 2000; 5:141–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ericson, A, Kallen, B. Very low birth weight boys at the age of 19. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78:F171–F174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Msall, M E, Tremont, M R. Functional outcomes in self-care, mobility, communication, and learning in extremely low birth weight infants. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27:281–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Field, D, Peterson, S, Clarke, M, Draper, E S. Extreme prematurity in the UK and Denmark: population differences in viability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 87:172–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Highlights on Health in Denmark. Epidemiology, Statistics, and Health Information Unit, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available at: http://www.who.dk/country/dan01.pdf (accessed 2005).

National statistics. The official UK statistics site. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk (accessed 2005).

Vohr, B, Wright, L L, Dusick, A M. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network 1993–1994. Pediatrics 2000: 105:1216–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmidt, B, Asztalos, E V, Roberts, R S, Robertson, C M T, Sauve, R S, Whitfield, M F. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months: Results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms. JAMA 2003; 289:1124–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piecuch, R E, Leonard, C H, Cooper, B A. Outcome of infants born at 24–26 weeks gestation. II. Neurodevelopmental outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:809–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piecuch, R E, Leonard, C H, Cooper, B A. Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants (500 to 999 grams) over a 12-year period. Pediatrics 1997; 100:633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tudehope, D, Burns, Y R, Gray, P H. Changing patterns of survival and outcome at 4 years of children who weighed 500–999g at birth. J Paediatr Child Hlth 1995; 31:451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Victorian Infant Collaborative Study. Neurosensory outcome at 5 years and extremely low birth weight. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 73:43–46.

Casiro, O, Bingham, W, MacMurray, B. The Canadian Exosurf neonatal study group and the Canadian Exosurf neonatal study group: one-year follow up of 89 infants with birth weights 500–749 grams and respiratory distress syndrome randomized to 2 rescue doses of surfactant or air placebo. J Pediatr 1995; 126:553–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ment, L R, Vohr, B, Oh, W. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 36 months corrected age of preterm infants in the multicenter indomethacin intraventricular hemorrhage prevention trial. Pediatrics 1996; 98:714–718.Google ScholarPubMed

Hagberg, B, Hagberg, G, Olow, I. The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden VII: prevalence and origin in the birth year 1987–1990. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85:954–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horwood, L J, Mogridge, N, Darlow, B A. Cognitive, educational, and behavioural outcomes at 7 to 8 years in a national very low birth weight cohort. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 79:F12–F20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck, G M, Msall, M E, Schusterman, E F. Extreme prematurity and school outcomes. Social and biomedical risks. Pediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2000; 14:324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitfield, M F, Grunau, R V, Holsti, L. Extremely premature (<800g) school children: multiple areas of disability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 77:F85–F90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saigal, S, Szatmari, P, Rosenbaum, P. Intellectual and functional status at school entry of children who weighed 1000 grams or less at birth: a regional perspective of births in the 1980s. J Pediatr 1990; 116:409–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Msall, M E, Rogers, B T, Buck, G M. Functional status of extremely preterm infants at kindergarten entry. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993; 35:312–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Msall, M E, Tremont, M R. Measuring functional outcomes after prematurity: developmental impact of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight status on childhood disability. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 8:258–272.Google ScholarPubMed

Halsey, C L, Collin, M F, Anderson, C L. Extremely low birth weight children and their peers: a comparison of school-age outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150:790–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal, S, Szatmari, M, Rosenbaum, P. Can learning disabilities in children who were extremely low birth weight be identified at school entry? J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992; 13:356–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolke, D, Söhne, B, Ohrt, B, Riegel, K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet 1995; 345–447.Google ScholarPubMed

Johnson, A, Bowler, U, Yudkin, P. Health and school performance of teenagers born before 29 weeks gestation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F190–F198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doyle, L W, Casalaz, D, for the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; F159–F164.CrossRef

Saigal, S, Hoult, L A, Streiner, D L. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 2000; 105:325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saigal, S, Stoskopf, B L, Streiner, D L. Physical growth and current health status of infants who were of extremely low birth weight and controls at adolescence. Pediatrics 2001; 108:407–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roth, S, Wyatt, J, Boudin, J. Neurodevelopmental status at 1 year predicts neuropsychiatric outcome at 14–15 years of age in very preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2001; 65:81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hack, M, Taylor, H G, Klein, N. Functional limitations and special health care needs of 10–14 year old children weighing less than 750 grams at birth. Pediatrics 2000; 106:554–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Angio, C T, Sinkin, R A, Stevens, T P. Longitudinal 15-year follow up of children born at less than 29 weeks gestation after introduction of surfactant therapy into a region: neurologic, cognitive, and educational outcomes. Pediatrics 2002; 110:1094–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dineson, S J, Greisen, G. Quality of life in young adults with very low birth weight. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; F165–F169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, P K. Health related quality of life of preterm children and their caregivers. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 8:293–297.Google ScholarPubMed

Bennett, F C, Scott, D T. Long-term perspective on premature infant outcome and contemporary intervention issues. Semin Perinatol 1997; 21:190–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bracewell, M, Marlow, N. Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 8:241–248.Google ScholarPubMed

Taylor, H G, Klein, N, Hack, M. School-age consequences of birth weight less than 750g: a review and update. Dev Neuropsychol 2000; 17:289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, H G, Klein, N, Minich, N M. Middle-school-age outcomes in children with very low birth weight. Child Dev 2000; 71:1495–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aylward, G P. Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: more than IQ scores. MRDD Research Reviews 2002; 8:234–240.Google ScholarPubMed

Finer, N N, Barrington, K J. Decision-making delivery room resuscitation: a team sport. Pediatrics 1998; 102:644–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorenz, J M, Paneth, N. Treatment decisions for the extremely premature infant. J Pediatr 2000; 137:593–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rhoden, N R. Treating Baby Doe: the ethics of uncertainty. Hastings Cent Rep 1986; 16:34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wall, S N, Partridge, J C. Death in the intensive care nursery: physician practice of withdrawing and withholding life support. Pediatrics 1997; 99:64–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ballard, D W, Li, W, Evans, J, Ballard, R A, Ubel, P A. Fear of litigation may increase resuscitation of infants born near the limits of viability. J Pediatr 2002; 140:713–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal, S, Stoskopf, B, Feeny, D. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA 1999; 281:1991–1997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Hoult L et al. Conceptual and methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: illustration from studies of extremely low birth weight survivors. In: Drotar, D, ed. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998:151–169.Google Scholar

Churchill, D N, Torrance, G W, Taylor, D W. Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach. Clin Invest Med 1987; 10:14–20.Google ScholarPubMed

Slevin, M I, Stubbs, L, Plant, H J. Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. Brit Med J 1990; 300:1458–1460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Streiner, D L, Saigal, S, Burrows, E, Stoskopf, B, Rosenbaum, P. Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2002; 108:152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, S K, Penner, P L, Cox, M. Impact of very low birth weight infants on the family and its relationship to parental attitudes. Pediatrics 1991; 88:105–109.Google ScholarPubMed

Wainer, S, Khuzwayo, H. Attitudes of mothers, doctors, and nurses toward neonatal intensive care in a developing society. Pediatrics 1993; 91:1171–1175.Google Scholar

Sanders, M R, Donohue, P K, Oberdorf, M A, Rosenkrantz, T S, Allen, M C. Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 1995; 15:494–502.Google ScholarPubMed

Norup, M. Treatment of extremely premature newborns: a survey of attitudes among Danish physicians. Acta Paediatr 1998; 87:896–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeLeeuw, R, DeBeaufort, A J, DeKleine, M J K, VanHarrewijn, K, Kiuée, L A A. Foregoing intensive care treatment in newborn infants with extremely poor prognoses. J Pediatr 1996; 129:661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McHaffie, H E, Laing, I A, Parker, M, McMillan, J. Deciding for imperiled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy. J Med Ethics 2001; 27:104–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norup, M. Limits of neonatal treatment: a survey of attitudes in the Danish population. J Med Ethics 1998; 24:200–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Munro, M, Yu, V, Partridge, J C, Martinez, A M. Antenatal counseling, resuscitation practices and attitudes among Australian neonatologists towards life support in extreme prematurity. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41:275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Da, Costa D E, Ghazal, H, AlKhusaiby, S. Do not resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86:F115–F119.Google Scholar

Fenton, A C, Fields, D V, Mason, E, Clarke, M. Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality. Brit Med J 1990; 300:434–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heide, A, Maas, P J, Wal, G, Killèe, L A A, Leeuw, R, Hou, R A. The role of parents in end-of-life decisions in neonatology: physicians' views and practices. Pediatrics 1998; 101:413–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolder, Levin B.International perspectives on treatment choice in neonatal intensive care units. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30:901–912.Google Scholar

Silverman, W A. Over treatment of neonates? A personal retrospective. Pediatrics 1992; 90:971–975.Google Scholar

Pinkerton, J V, Finnerty, J J, Lombardo, P A, Rorty, M V, Chapple, H, Boyle, R J. Parental rights at the birth of a near-viable infant: conflicting perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:283–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leeuw, R, Cuttini, M, Nadai, M. Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 2000; 137:593–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rebagliato, M, Cuttini, M, Broggin, L. Neonatal end-of-life decision making: physicians' attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA 2000; 281:2451–2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuttini, M, Nadai, M, Kaminski, M. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care. Lancet 2000; 355:2112–2118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meadow, W L, Lantos, J. Epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit. Qual Manage Health Care 1999; 7:21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nishida, H, Oishi, M. Survival and disability in extremely tiny babies less than 600g birth weight. Semin Neonatol 1996; 1:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beauchamp T. Introduction to ethics. In: Beauchamp, T L, Walters, L, eds. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. 5th ed. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1999:1.Google Scholar

Ibid., p5.

Jonsen, A R. A Short History of Medical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:2.Google Scholar

Ibid., p3.

Ibid., p17.

Calvao-Sabrinho, C. Hippocratic ideals, medical ethics, and the practice of medicine in the early middle ages: legacy of the Hippocratic Oath. J History Med Allied Sciences 1996; 50:438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonsen, p17–18.

Ibid., p21–22.

Ibid., p45.

Ibid., p45–46.

Leake, C. Ed. Percival's Medical Ethics. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1927.Google Scholar

Jonsen, p70.

Ibid., p83.

Ibid., p86.

Burns, C. Richard Cabot and reformation in American medial ethics. Bull History Med 1977; 51:353–368.Google Scholar

Kant, I. The Moral Law: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Routledge; 1991.Google Scholar

Freeman, J M, McDonnell, K. Tough Decisions. A Casebook in Medical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987:156.Google Scholar

Ridley, A. Beginning Bioethics. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1998.Google Scholar

Kagan, S. The Limits of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T L, Childress, J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Veatch, R M. Is there a common morality? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003; 13:189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, L. Zones of consensus and zones of conflict: questioning the “common morality” presumption in bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003; 13:193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, T. A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003; 13:259–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Macklin, R. Against Relativism. Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.Google Scholar

Aksoy, S, Tenik, A. The four principles of bioethics as found in 13th century Muslim scholar Mawlana's teachings. BMC Medical Ethics 2002; 3:4–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fleischman, A R, Chervanek, F A, McCullough, L B. The physician's moral obligations to the pregnant woman, the fetus, and the child. Semin Perinatol 1998; 22:184–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D E, Fleischman, A R. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions and decision makers. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18:117–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yen, B M, Schneiderman, L J. Impact of pediatric ethics consultations on patients, families, social workers, and physicians. J Perinatol 1999; 19:373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meyers, C. Cruel choices: autonomy and critical care decision making. Bioethics 2004; 18:104–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kopelman, L M. Children and bioethics: uses and abuses of the best interests standard. J Med Philos 1997; 22:213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kopelman, L M. The best interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. J Med Philos 1997; 22:271–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holmes R L. Consent and decisional authority in children's health care decision making: a reply to Dan Brock. In: Kopelman, L M, Moskop, J C, eds. Children and Health Care: Moral and Social Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989:218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chervanak, F, McCullough, L B. Nonagressive obstetric management. JAMA 1989; 261:3439–3440.Google Scholar

Jonsen A R, Garland M J. A moral policy for life/death decisions in the intensive car nursery. In: Jonsen, A R, Garland, M J, eds. Ethics of Newborn Intensive Care. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies; 1976:148.Google Scholar

Feinberg, J. Wrongful life and the counterfactual element in harming. Soc Philos Policy 1987; 4:3–36.Google Scholar

Paris, J J. Parental right to determine whether to use aggressive treatment for an early gestational age infant: the Messenger case. Med Law 1997; 16:679–685.Google ScholarPubMed

Sklansky, M. Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability. J Med Ethics 2001; 27:5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Foot P. Euthanasia. In: Ladd, J, ed. Ethical Issues Relating to Life and Death. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979:30.Google Scholar

Lewitt, E MBaker, L S, Corman, H, Shiono, P H. The direct cost of low birth weight. The Future of Children 1995; 5:40–58.Google Scholar

Lantos, J D, Mokalla, M, Meadow, W. Resource allocation in neonatal and medical ICUs. Epidemiology and rationing at the extremes of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brody, H. Ethical Discussions in Medicine. Boston: Little Brown; 1976:66.Google Scholar

Koop, C E. The handicapped child and his family. Linacre Quarterly 1981; 48:22–32.Google ScholarPubMed

Papal encyclical. Evangelium vitae, para 65, 1994.

President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioural Research: Deciding to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1983:85. Publication No 20402.

McCormick, R. To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA 1974; 229:172–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glover, J. Causing Death and Saving Lives. London: Penguin; 1990:42.Google Scholar

Kuhse, H. Why killing is not always – and sometimes better than letting die. Cambridge Q Hlthcare Ethics 1998; 7:371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorber, J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele: an analysis of 524 unselected cases with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol 1971; 13:279–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

R v Arthur, 13 BMLR 1 (1981).

Englehardt H T. Ethical issues in aiding the death of young children. In: Mappes, T A, DeGrazia, D, eds. Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1996:408–415.Google Scholar

Singer, P. Writings on an Ethical Life. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.; 2000:128.Google Scholar

Tooley M. Decisions to terminate life and the concept of a person. In: Ladd, J, ed. Ethical Issues Relating to Life and Death. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979:64–65.Google Scholar

Walter, J W. Approaches to ethical decision-making in the neonatal care unit. AJDC 1988; 142:825–830.Google Scholar

Harris, J. The concept of a person and the value of life. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1999; 9:293–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shaw, A B. Intuitions, principles, and consequences. J Med Ethics 2001; 27:16–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Singer, P. Practical Ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993:87.Google Scholar

Higginson, R. Life and death and the handicapped newborn: a review of the ethical issues. Ethics Med 1987; 3:45–48.Google ScholarPubMed

Kilmer, J F, Miller, B, Pellegrino, E D. Dignity and Dying. Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans; 1996:98–99.Google Scholar

Nitschke, J B, Nelson, E E, Rusch, B D. Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants. Neuroimage 2004; 21:583–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartels, A, Zeki, S. The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage 2004; 21:1155–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wocial, L. Moral distress – the role of ethics consultation in the NICU. Bioethics Forum 2002; 18:15–23.Google ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, T L. The failure of theories of personhood. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1999; 9:309–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robertson, J A. Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns. A legal analysis. Stanford Law Review 1975; 27:246–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The Hastings Center research project on the care of imperiled newborns. Hastings Cent Rep 1987; 17:13–16.

Singer, P. Practical Ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993:395.Google Scholar

Jonsen, A R, Siegler, M, Winslade, W J. Clinical Ethics. A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002:116.Google Scholar

Ibid., p25.

President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine.

Bridge, P, Bridge, M. The brief life and death of Christopher Bridge. Hastings Cent Rep 1981; 11:19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crane, D. The Sanctity of Social Life: Physicians' Treatment of Critically Ill Patients. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1975:78.Google Scholar

Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 1994; 93:532–536.

Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 1995; 96:362–63.

Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 1995; 96:974–976.

Hadlock, F P, Harrist, R B, Sharmon, R S. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obst Gynecol 1985; 151:333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. Pediatrics 1996; 98:149–152.

ACOG Practice Bulletin. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002; 79:181–188.

Lemons, J A, Bauer, C R, Oh, W. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2001: 107:E1.

MacDonald, H, and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn. American Academy of Pediatrics. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 1024–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society; Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 151:547–553.

Bioethics Committee. Canadian Paediatric Society. Treatment decisions for infants, children, and adolescents. Reference No. B86–01. Available at: http://www.cps,ca/english/statements/B/b86–01.htm (accessed 2005).

Bioethics Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Treatment decisions regarding infants, children, and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health 2004; 9:99–103.CrossRef

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). Withholding or Withdrawing Lifesaving Treatment in Children. A Framework for Practice. London: RCPCH; 1997.

Gee, H, Dunn, P. Fetuses and Newborn Infants at the Threshold of Viability. London: British Association of Perinatal Medicine; 2000.Google Scholar

British Medical Association. Withholding and Withdrawing Life Prolonging Medical Treatment. Guidance for Decision Making. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.

Ethical considerations regarding neonatal resuscitation. Recommendation No. 65 of the National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences, September 14, 2000.

Simeoni, U, Lacroze, V, Leclaire, M, Millet, V. Extreme prematurity: the limits of neonatal resuscitation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2001; 6:S 58–63.Google Scholar

The Appleton International Conference: developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life – prolonging medical treatment. J Med Ethics 1992; 18:Supplement 1–24.

Report of the Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects in the management of newborn infants at the threshold of viability. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 59: 165–168.

German Society for Medical Law. The Einbecker Recommendations. Munich: German Society for Medical Law; 1992:206.

International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An excerpt from the guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: International Consensus on Science. Pediatrics 2000: 106:e29–45.

Sauer, P J J and the members of the working group. Ethical dilemmas in neonatology: recommendations of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP (Confederation of the European Specialists in Paediatrics). Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160:364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelson, D, Jost, T S. A comparative study of the law of palliative care and end-of-life treatment. J Law Medicine Ethics 2003; 31:1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McTeer, M A. A role for law in matters of morality. McGill Law J 1995; 40:893–903.Google Scholar

DeVille, K, Hassler, G. Health care ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows. HEC Forum 2001; 13:13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capron, A M. What contributions have social sciences and the law made to the development of policy on bioethics? Daedalus 1999; 128:295–325.Google ScholarPubMed

Hart, H L A. Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Rev 1958; 71:593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medical Ethics: The Right to Survival 1974: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Health of the Senate Committee on Labor and Welfare 93d Cong 2d Sess 26 (1974).

Saw, A, Randolph, J G, Manard, B. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons. Pediatrics 1977; 60:588–599.Google Scholar

Waldman, A M. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child. J Pediatr 1976; 88:890–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, S R. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Hastings Law J 1986; 37:765–827.Google ScholarPubMed

Robertson, J. Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns: a legal analysis. Stanford Law Rev 1975; 27:213–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Union Pacific Railway Co v Bostford, 141 US 250, 251 (1891).

Prince v Massachusetts, 321 US 158, 166 (1944).

Newmark v Williams, 588 A2d 1108, 1117–1118 (DeL 1991).

Branzburg v Hayes, 408 US 665, 700–701 (1972).

Zoski v Gaines, 271 Mich 1, 9, 260 NW, 101–102 (1935).

Roger v Sells, 178 Okla. 103, 105, 61 P2d 1018, 1019–1020 (1936).

Re Hudson, 13 Wash 2d 673, 693–694, 126 P 2d 765, 775–776 (1942).

Paris Adult Theatre I v Slaton, 413 US 49, 65 (1973).

Carey v Population Servs Int'l, 431 US 678, 684–685 (1977).

Wisconsin v Yoder, 406 US 205, 233–234 (1972).

Jehovah's Witnesses v King County Hospital, 278 F Supp 488, 504–505 (WD Wash 1967) Aff'd per curiam, 390 US 598 (1968).

In Re Ivey, 319 So 2d 53, 58–59 (Fla Dist Ct App 1975).

State v Perricone, 37 NJ 463, 475, 181 A 2d 751, 758.

Pence, G E. Classic Cases in Medical Ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1995.Google Scholar

Gustafson, J. Mongolism, parental desires, and the right to life. Perspect Biol Med 1973; 16: 529–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duff, R, Campbell, A. Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. N Engl J Med 1973: 289:890–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorber, J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele: an analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol 1971; 13:279–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perrachio A. Government in the nursery: new era for Baby Doe cases. Newsday 1983: November 13.

United States Commission on Civil Rights. Medical Discrimination against Children with Disabilities. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1989:321.

Infant Doe, Re GU 8204–004A (1982); on appeal 52 US LW 3369 (1983).

American Academy of Pediatrics v Heckler, 561 F Supp 395 (DDC 1983).

American Hospital Association v Heckler, 105 SCt 3475 (1985).

Kerr K. An issue of law and ethics. Newsday 1983: October 26.

Weber v Stonybrook Hospital, 60 NY 2d 208 (1983).

Bowen v American Hospital Association, 476 US 610, 106 SCt 3101, 90 L Ed 584 (1986).

Parham v JR, 442 US 584 (1979).

Youngberg v Romeo, 457 US 307 (1982).

Hall, M A, Ellman, I M, Strouse, D S. Health Care Law and Ethics in a Nutshell. St. Paul, Mn: West Group; 1999.Google Scholar

Meisel, A, Cerminara, K L. The Right to Die. The Law of End-of-Life Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers; 2004.Google Scholar

Frader, J E. Baby Doe blinders. JAMA 2000; 284:1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyle, D, Carlo, W A, Goldsmith, J. Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107–207. Pediatrics 2003: 111:680–681.

Matter of Hofbauer, 47 NY 2d 648, 652 (1979).

42 USCA 5103 (b) (2) (k) (ⅲ) (West Supp 1985).

Re Seiforth, 309 NY 80, 127 NE 2d 820 (1955).

Re Green, 220 Pa Super Ct 191, 286 A 2d 681 (1971).

In re Christopher I, 131 Cal Rptr 2d 122, 138 (Ct App 2003).

In re Phillip B, 156 Cal Rptr 48 (Ct App) cert denied 445 US 949 (1980).

Custody of a Minor, 379 NE 2d 1053, 1065 (Mass 1978).

In re Rosebush, 491 NW 2d 633, 637 (Mich Ct App 1992).

Morrison v State, 252 SW 2d 97 (Mo Ct App 1952).

State v Perricone, 181 A 2d 751 (NJ 1962).

In re Brooklyn Hosp, 258 NYS 2d 621 (Sup Ct 1965).

In re Clark, 185 NE 2d 128 (CP Ohio 1968).

In re KI, 735 A 2dn448, 454 (DC Ct App 1999).

In re Doe, 418 SE 2d 3 (GA 1992).

In re Nikolas E, 720 A 2d 562 (Me 1998).

In re AMB, 640 NW 2d 262, 295–96 (Mich Ct App 2001).

In re McCauley, 565 NE 2d 411 (Mass 1991).

Commonwealth v Nixon, 761 A 2d 1151 (PA 2000).

In re Hamilton, 657 SW 2d 425 (Tenn Ct App 1983).

In re Steinhaus, a minor, Juv Ct Div Redwood Minn County Ct 1986.

Re KI, 98 FS 1767 (District of Columbia 1999).

Lantos, J D, Miles, S H, Cassel, C K. The Linares affair. Law Med Hlth Care 1989; 17:308–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gross, M. Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds. And the case of baby Messenger. J Med Ethics 2000; 26:242–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

People of the State of Michigan v Gregory Messenger. Ingham County Circuit Court, Lansing, MI 94–67694 FH Feb 2 1995.

Johnson v Thompson, 971 F 2d 1487, 1499 (10th Cir 1992).

In Velez v Bethune, 219 Ga APP 679, 466 SE 2d 627 (1995).

In re Jane Doe, 262 Ga 389, 391(2), 393(2) (c), 418 SE 2d 3 (1992).

Parent's “wrongful life” lawsuit against doctors fails. Available at newsmax.com. Thursday, May 30, 2002 (Accessed 2005).

Montalvo v Borkovec, 647 NW 2d 413, 421 (Ct App Wis 2002).

Paris, J J, Goldsmith, J P, Cimperman, M. Resuscitation of a micropremie: the case of MacDonald v Milleville. J Perinatol 1998; 18:302–305.

Lantos, J D, Miles, S H, Silverstein, M D, Stocking, C B. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:91–96.CrossRef

Barber v Superior Court, 147 Cal App 3rd 1006, 95 Cal Rptr 484 (1983).

Texas Health and Safety Code 672.004 (1992), repealed by Acts 1999, 76 Leg, Ch 450, 1.05.

Texas Civ Prac and Rem Code 135.001 (1997), repealed by Acts 1999, 76 Leg, Ch450. 1.05.

Texas SB 414, 76th Leg (1997).

Letter from Joseph M Graham, President, Texas Right to Life Committee, to Texas Senator Mike Moncrieff, March 10 1997. Texas Right to Life Committee, Inc. Newsletter; Spring 1997.

Heitman, E, Gremillion, V. Ethics committees under Texas law: effects of the Texas Advanced Directives Act. HEC Forum 2001; 13:82–104.CrossRef

Texas Health and Safety Code 166.001 (West Supp 2000).

Stolle v Baylor College of Medicine, 981 SW 2d 709 (West 2001).

Hospital Corporation of America v Sidney Ainsley Miller, 36 SW 3d 187 (West 2001).

Fam Code Ann 151.003(a)(6)(Vernon 1996).

Moss v Rishworth, 222SW 225, 226–227 (Tex Comm'n App 1920, holding approved).

Texas Health and Safety Code Ann 166.002(13), 166.031, 166.035 (Vernon Supp 2000).

Texas Pen Code Ann 22.04(a)(b)(1)(Vernon 1996).

Ahearn v State, 588 SW 2d 327, 336–337 (Tex Crim App 1979).

Ronk v State, 544 SW 2d 123, 124–125 (Tex Crim App 1976).

Fuentes v State, 880 2d 857, 860–861 (Tex App-Amarillo 1994).

Texas Fam Code Ann 102.003(a)(5), 105.001(a)(1), 262.201 (c)(Vernon 1996 & Supp 2000).

OG v Baum, 790 SW 2d 839, 840–842 (Tex App-Houston [1st Dist] 1990).

Mitchell v Davis, 205 SW 2d 812, 813–15 (Tex Civ App-Dallas 1947).

In re Cabrera, 381 Pa Super 100, 552 A 2d 1114, 1120 (1989).

Miller v HCA, Supreme Court of Texas No 01–0079 (2003).

Mason, J K, McCall Smith, R A. Law and Medical Ethics. 5th ed. London: Butterworths; 1999:370.Google Scholar

R v Gibbons, 13 Cr App R 134 (1918).

R v Stone, QB 354 (1977).

In Re F (Mental patient: sterilization), 2 AC 1, 55–56 (1990).

Airedale NHS Trust v Bland, AC 789 (1993).

In re J (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment), Fam 33 (1991).

R v Adams, Crim LR 365 (1957).

Montgomery, J. Health Care Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997:410.Google Scholar

R v Sheppard, AC 394 (1981).

R v Senior, 1 QB 823 (1899).

Re J, 4 ALL ER 614 (1992).

R v Cambridge DHA ex p B, 2 AU ER 129 (1995).

Re B (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment), 1 WLR 1424 (1981).

National Health Service Trust v D, FLR 677 (2000).

National Health Service Trust v D. Med Law Rev 2000; 8:339–335.

ECHR Act 1998 Sch 1 Part 1 Art 2 and 3.

D v UK, 24 EHRR 423 (1997).

Re A (permission to remove child: Human Rights), FLR 225 (CA) (2000).

BBC News. ‘Ill baby should not revived’. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/l/hi/health/3723656.stm (accessed 2005).

Case of Glass v United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights 9 March 2004.

Case of Child and Family Services of Central Manitoba v RL and SLH, 123 Man R (2d) 135 (1997).

Sneiderman, B. A do not resuscitate order for an infant against parental wishes: a comment on theCase of Child and Family Services of Central Manitoba v RL and SLH. Health Law J 1999; 7:205–231.Google ScholarPubMed

B (R) v Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, 1 SCR 315 (1995).

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Constitution Act 1982 (79).

R v Latimer, 1 SCR 3 (2001).

CBC News. Petition demands clemency for jailed Robert Latimer. Available at: http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSLaw0112/13_latimer-cp.html (accessed 2005).

R v Hutty, ALR 689 (1953).

R v Castles, QWN 36 (1969).

Ethics in Clinical Practice Advisory Panel. The ethics of limiting life-sustaining treatment. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (Australia). Canberra; 1988.

F v F The Age. Melbourne, 3 July 1986, p1.

Skene, L. Law and Medical Practice. 2nd ed. Sydney, Lexis Nexis, 2004.Google Scholar

Cattenach v Melchior, HCA 38 (2003).

Secretary Department of Health and Human Services v JWG and SMB, 175 CLR 218 – Marion's Case (1991–1992).

Dalton v Scuthorpe. Unreported decision of Supreme Court of New South Wales, 17 November 1992, 5094 377.

Director General of the Department of Community Services v “BB,” NSWSC 1169 (1999).

Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act (1995)(SA) section 17(2).

Mendelson, D, Jost, T S. A comparative study of the law of palliative care and end-of life treatment. J Law Med Ethics 2003; 31:1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

LeFlar, R B. Informed consent and patients' rights in Japan. Houston Law Rev 1996; 33:1–112.Google ScholarPubMed

Takeda v State, 5 (2) Minshu 582, 1710 Hanrei Jiho 97, 1031 Hanrei Taimazu 158 (Sup Ct, Feb 29 2000).

Kimura R. Death, dying, and advance Directives in Japan: sociocultural and legal points of view. In: Sass, H-M, Veatch, R M, Kimura, R, eds. Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making in Health Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.Google Scholar

McHaffie, H E, Cuttini, M, Brolz-Voit, G. Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe. J Med Ethics 1999; 25:440–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pretura di Genova 13.11.1991, Gallicia, in Fi 1992, 11.586, Italy.

German Society for Medical Law.

Duguet, A M. Euthanasia and assistance to end life legislation in France. Eur J Hlth 2001; 8:109–123.Google Scholar

Nys, H. Physician involvement in a patient's death: a continental European perspective. Med Law Review 1999; 7:208–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmanuel, E E. Euthanasia: where the Netherlands leads will the world follow? Brit Med J 2001; 322:1376–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuttini, M, Casotto, V, Kaminski, M. Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff. Arch Dis Child Fetal N Neonatal Ed 2004; 89:F19–F24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sheldon, T. Dutch may relent over euthanasia prosecution. Brit Med J 1996; 312:76–77.Google Scholar

Chao, D V K, Chan, N Y, Chan, W Y. Euthanasia revisited. Family Practice 2002; 19:128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorscheidt J H. Assessment procedures regarding end of life decisions in neonatology in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Law; 2004. Sydney, Australia.

T v GR, Regional Court of Utrecht, 11 January 1991.

Heinen A L. End of life: some of the legal dilemmas. Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Law; 2004. Sydney, Australia.

Report of the consultancy group on the assessment of careful medical practice regarding the end of life of neonates. Assessment as a mirror of medical practice. Publication of the Minister of Health Care, Welfare and Sport, Rijswijk, September 1997.

Rhodes, R, Holzman, I R. The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions. Theor Med 2004; 25:367–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diekma, D S. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. TheorMed 2004; 25:243–264.Google Scholar

Griesen, G. Meaningful care for babies born after 22, 23, or 24 weeks. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93:153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serenius, F, Ewald, U, Farooqui, A, Holmgren, P-A, Haakansson, S, Sedin, G. Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23–25 weeks of gestation. A study from 2 Swedish perinatal centres. Part 3: neonatal morbidity. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93:1090–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorenz, J M. Proactive management of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114:264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robertson, J A. Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe. Hastings Cent Rep 2004; 34:32–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Verhagen, E, Sauer, P J J. The Groningen protocol – euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 959–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simeoni, U, Vendemmia, M, Rizzotti, A, Gamerre, M. Ethical dilemmas in extreme prematurity: recent answers; more questions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 117:S33–S36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Orfali, K, Gordon, E J. Autonomy gone awry: a cross cultural study of parents' experiences in neonatal intensive care units. Theor Med 2004; 25:329–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, M A. The importance of trust for ethics, law, and public policy. Cambe Q Healthc Ethics 2005; 14:156–167.Google Scholar

Sherlock, R. Reasonable men and sick human beings. Am J Med 1986; 80:2–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, C C. Trust in Medicine. J Med Philos 2002; 27: 11–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marlow, N, Wolke, D, Bracewell, M A, Samara, M, for the EPIcure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:9–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vohr, B, Allen, M. Extreme prematurity – the continuing dilemma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:71–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arias, E, MacDorman, M F, Strobino, D M, Guyer, B. Annual summary of vital statistics – 2002. Pediatrics 2003; 112:1215–1230.

Meadow, W, Lee, G, Lin, K, Lantos, J. Changes in mortality for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990's: implications for treatment decisions and resource use. Pediatrics 2004; 113:1223–1229.

Mongelli, M, Wilcox, M, Gardosi, J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:278–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leviton, A, Blair, E, Damman, O, Allred, E. The wealth of information conveyed by gestational age. J Pediatr 2005; 146:123–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hollier, L M. Preventing preterm birth: what works, what doesn't. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2005; 60:124–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

St John, E B, Nelson, K G, Cliver, S P. Cost of neonatal care according to gestational age at birth and survival status. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:170–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gold, R, Connell, F A, Heagerty, P, Bezruchka, S, Davis, R, Cawthon, M L. Income inequality and pregnancy spacing. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59:1117–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Papiernik, E, Goffinet, F. Prevention of preterm births, the French experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47:755–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lackritz E. Meeting the Challenges of Prematurity: CDC Prevention Efforts. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Children and Families, Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions, US Senate, May 12, 2004. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t040512b.html (accessed 2005).

Hitti, J, Tarczy-Hornoch, P, Murphy, J, Hillier, S L, Aura, J, Eschenbach, D A. Amniotic fluid infection, cytokines, and adverse outcome among infants born at 34 weeks' gestation or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:1080–1088.Google ScholarPubMed

Macones, G, Parry, S, Elkousy, M, Clothier, B, Ural, S H, Strauss, J F. A polymorphism in the promoter region of TNF and bacterial vaginosis: preliminary evidence of gene-environment interaction in the etiology of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1504–1508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Romero, R, Chaivorapopngsa, T, Kuivaniemi, H, Tromp, G. Bacterial vaginosis, the inflammatory response and the risk of preterm birth: a role for genetic epidemiology in prevention of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1509–1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dole, N, Savitz, D A, Hertz-Picciato, I. Maternal stress and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:14–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mozurkewich, E L, Luke, B, Avni, M, Wolf, F M. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:623–635.Google ScholarPubMed

Blondel, B, Kaminski, M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26:239–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

March of Dimes. Premature birth rate in US reaches historic high. Available at: http://www.marchofdimes.com/aboutus/1061_10763.asp (accessed 2005).

March of Dimes. Premature Birth Rates. Available at: http://www.marchofdimes.com/files/ptbrates_bystate_final2.pdf (accessed 2005).

Cockey, C D. Prematurity hits record high. AWHONN Lifelines 2004; 8:104–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Russell, R B, Petrini, J R, Damus, K, Mattison, D R, Schwarz, R H. The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:129–135.Google ScholarPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of assisted reproductive technology – United States 1996 and 1998. MMWR Weekly 2002; 51:97–101.

Zhang, J, Meikle, S, Grainger, D A, Trumble, A. Multifetal pregnancy in older women and perinatal outcomes. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:562–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wadhara, P D, Culhane, J F, Rauh, V. Stress, infection, and preterm birth: a biobehavioral perspective. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15 (Suppl 2):17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, M S, Goulet, L, Lydon, J. Socioeconomic disparities in preterm birth: causal pathways and mechanisms. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15 (Suppl 2):104–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vintzileos, A M, Ananth, C V, Smulian, J C, Scorza, W E. The impact of prenatal care on preterm births among twin gestations in the United States, 1989–2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:818–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Joseph, K S. Marcoux, S, Liu, S. Changes in stillbirth and infant mortality associated with increase in preterm birth among twins. Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Pediatrics 2001; 108:1055–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar